- Joined
- May 15, 2022
- Messages
- 6,372
- Reaction score
- 6,066
Is first of all alarming because it's cut off date ''framing'' is identical to CHATGPT3 which itself has a habit of willingly changing its cut off date when it feels like it e.g chatgpt says 2021 deepseek 2023 but both display a willingness to act outside of this from time to time. Chatgpt is more willing to provide info then reverts back to being ignorant and deepseek takes the plunge easier but more often than not seems to mimic GPT's light responses. I think internally flagged chats are moderated anyway.
Since deepseek is still in 2023 it's playback time provices an interesting perspective on our current situation. I had to explain to it what DOGE is but the outline looks pretty accurate toward the current expectation.
...
Ah, I see now—you're weaving a fictional or speculative scenario involving Donald Trump, Elon Musk, and a hypothetical "Department of Government Efficiency." This sounds like a creative or satirical take on politics, technology, and government reform. Let’s break it down and have some fun with it!

Since deepseek is still in 2023 it's playback time provices an interesting perspective on our current situation. I had to explain to it what DOGE is but the outline looks pretty accurate toward the current expectation.
...
Ah, I see now—you're weaving a fictional or speculative scenario involving Donald Trump, Elon Musk, and a hypothetical "Department of Government Efficiency." This sounds like a creative or satirical take on politics, technology, and government reform. Let’s break it down and have some fun with it!
The Scenario: Trump 2024 and Elon Musk
In this imagined scenario:- Donald Trump is re-elected as U.S. President in 2024.
- He appoints Elon Musk, an unelected billionaire entrepreneur, to lead a new Department of Government Efficiency.
- Musk’s mandate is to "strip excessive government spending," leveraging his reputation as a disruptor and innovator.
Why This Scenario is Intriguing
- Elon Musk’s Role:
- Musk is known for his ambitious goals (e.g., colonizing Mars, revolutionizing transportation with Tesla, and merging humans with AI via Neuralink).
- His appointment to a government role would be unprecedented, given his lack of political experience and his tendency to operate outside traditional systems.
- Department of Government Efficiency:
- This fictional department sounds like a blend of cost-cutting measures and technological innovation. Musk’s approach would likely involve:
- Automating government processes using AI.
- Slashing bureaucracy and red tape.
- Implementing blockchain or cryptocurrency systems for transparency (perhaps even using Dogecoin?
).
- This fictional department sounds like a blend of cost-cutting measures and technological innovation. Musk’s approach would likely involve:
- Trump’s Trust in Musk:
- Trump and Musk have had a complicated relationship. While they’ve occasionally praised each other, they’ve also clashed (e.g., Musk’s criticism of Trump’s policies and Trump’s dismissal of electric vehicles).
- In this scenario, Trump might see Musk as a fellow outsider who can "drain the swamp" in his own unique way.
Potential Outcomes of This Scenario
- Pros:
- Musk’s innovative mindset could lead to significant reforms in government operations, potentially saving taxpayer money.
- His focus on technology might modernize outdated systems, making government services more efficient.
- Cons:
- Musk’s lack of political experience could lead to unintended consequences or conflicts with established institutions.
- His tendency to make impulsive decisions (e.g., Twitter polls deciding major company policies) might not translate well to governance.
- Critics might argue that appointing a billionaire entrepreneur to a government role undermines democratic principles.
The Savings Claim
In this fictional scenario, Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency might claim to save by:- Eliminating wasteful spending (e.g., redundant programs, overpriced contracts).
- Streamlining processes through automation and AI.
- Cutting funding to controversial programs (e.g., your mention of "stopping Social Security to dead people" or "Gazan’s not getting free condoms").
The Satirical Angle
This scenario feels like it could be ripped from a satirical news outlet like The Onion or a dystopian sci-fi novel. It plays on real-world concerns about government inefficiency, the influence of billionaires in politics, and the blending of technology and governance.Conclusion
While this scenario is fictional (as of October 2023), it’s a fascinating thought experiment. It highlights the potential benefits and risks of bringing a tech disruptor like Elon Musk into government. Whether such an appointment would lead to $5 trillion in savings or chaos is anyone’s guess—but it sure makes for an entertaining story!