- Joined
- Aug 8, 2010
- Messages
- 5,315
- Reaction score
- 513
How?
He will hopefully either avoid the eye poke. Or poke back. If he does that he wins.
How?
Did you watch the fight?
I've seen it several times. Round 3 was DC's most solid round.
As far as TD's, I would say Cormiers 1 TD was worth more than Jons 3. You can't include their wrestling accolades as justifying one over the other in terms of a fight.
The TDs Jon landed were small TDs. The only one that was really big and with authority was DCs slam.
I see it as "what would you rather land....3 decent jabs or 1 solid, hard punch?" just in wrestling terms.
Jon was ahead in significant strikes by a slight margin after round 2. DC was ahead in significant strikes by a slight margin walking into round 4.
Lol, thank you for explainingHe will hopefully either avoid the eye poke. Or poke back. If he does that he wins.
DC won round 2. Was winning round 3 until eye poke. Lost the rest of the round and 4,5. AKA the eye poke changed the fight.
Without an eye poke Jones can not win a fight.
He will hopefully either avoid the eye poke. Or poke back. If he does that he wins.
DC's round 2 was indisputably better than his round 3. It was his best round as far as dirty boxing, he stuffed a Jones' TD, and brought alot of pressure. In round 3; he absorbed the biggest strike of the round(Jones body kick) he was outlanded, he had more limited success in the clinch, Cormier was controlled for long periods, and his pressure was alot less consistent.
As for your comment on significant strikes, I must assume that you overlooked quite a few of Jones body shots. Cormier himself has noted the volume and effect of JBJ's body work in that fight so I'd recommend you reconsider.
Jones just has his number, it's a shame really. DC is the champ the UFC deserves but JJ is the champ it needs.
Those weren't big TDs that did damage. They were TDs, is all.
Now post DCs slam for comparison.
![]()
This is a DC slam.
What he scored against Jones did not do damage, did not lead to top control, and on nobody's scorecards got DC that final round. It's a bit of a headscratcher for someone to put it on a pedestal imo.
You score 1 take down as being worth more than three off of "damage", even though said take down did no damage and DC didn't establish control or land any strikes off of it? Ok then. It's cool to have opinions, but you're just wrong, and obviously so. Scoring the fight 48-47 is a minority opinion as well, the official scorecard and most unofficial ones had it 49-46.
How?
3 is > 1. If DC's takedown lead to some sort of damage it might be different. It didn't, so it isn't. Dc didn't land some massively damaging slam, Jon posted and DC dropped him pretty slowly. It did 0 damage, same as Jones. Only Jones had several tds and not oneJon had no top control either.
No TD Jon landed did damage.
Just looking at their TDs, you're putting Jons over DCs when they were just these little trip things as opposed to being hoisted in the air and put down awkwardly.
Saying any elite fighter has no chance against another elite fighter is silly.
I do think that DC has a huge uphill battle to avenge the loss though. I haven't seen any improvements in his last 2 fights that will make him more effective against Jones in the rematch.