- Joined
- Mar 16, 2013
- Messages
- 30,389
- Reaction score
- 1
Dave Sholler leaving the UFC
- Thread starter Killuminati0947
- Start date
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2013
- Messages
- 30,389
- Reaction score
- 1
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2013
- Messages
- 10,312
- Reaction score
- 149
Damn, never got to see him bloat up like Dana and Lorenzo.
TRT Sholler was going to be amazing.
TRT Sholler was going to be amazing.
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2013
- Messages
- 30,389
- Reaction score
- 1
- Joined
- May 24, 2009
- Messages
- 16,686
- Reaction score
- 54
It didn't have to go there ...
Was not my call, but ...
I'm gonna give credit where it's due - @rjmbrd brought it made the tussle exciting; I got his angles, but he pulled a Chael (and not a Shonie) right before that ending sequence. It was a sick bout, but that ending was like...
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2013
- Messages
- 30,389
- Reaction score
- 1
I'm gonna give credit where it's due - @rjmbrd brought it made the tussle exciting; I got his angles, but he pulled a Chael (and not a Shonie) right before that ending sequence. It was a sick bout, but that ending was like...
I actually like(d) the guy (even though he uses "feels" like a teen chick would)
He knows his stuff, but .............................
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2010
- Messages
- 26,293
- Reaction score
- 17,802
Now we are playing a game called "STUPID OR LIAR" featuring FrankieNYC
Here is what I wrote, verbatim:
I'm still waiting.
Did I mention an ambiguous two word tweet? Read what I wrote....
Shame on your for pretending.
Now I think you're a full blown liar / idiot.
Here is what I wrote, verbatim:
I'm still waiting.
Did I mention an ambiguous two word tweet? Read what I wrote....
Shame on your for pretending.
Now I think you're a full blown liar / idiot.
Here ya go
Dave Meltzer audio from 10/08/16 (its behind a paywall, so I created an audio of the info below)
Dave Meltzer tweet from yesterday
View attachment 154923
Now before you get your shinebox - go check your PM for my email to PayPal me $100
Tagging @Homeless Infant to monitor it for fun
@tithas &
@cade187 - here is the audio referenced yesterday
Attachments
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2010
- Messages
- 26,293
- Reaction score
- 17,802
He's literally faking it. I denied an ambiguous tweet would substantiate a story - so I offered him $100 if one of the (enter list of MMA blogs I specified) filed a story confirming it.
The liar / ding-dong responded by posting the same tweet and saying it was in an audio transcript.
He literally replied with the same thing I refuted was a source, and offered money if he could provide an actual source. For Pete's sake.
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2009
- Messages
- 8,341
- Reaction score
- 2
Ducking the Jones rematch
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2006
- Messages
- 22,585
- Reaction score
- 22,316
Guys building himself quite the resume.
- Joined
- May 24, 2009
- Messages
- 16,686
- Reaction score
- 54
I feel you. You can still play the "Meltzer's horseshit" card and try and get it overturned (or maybe an instant rematch), but how it's "lookin'" (and that's what the judges are here for baby)...
...is like Lindland vs. Bustamante.
Objectively, Meltzer's credible enough to make this at least 50/50. He's also not soooo deeply embedded that he can't make mistakes or not have specifics down to a T. But he's pretty accurate almost all of the time. And for 30+ years.
![{<hhh]](http://i.imgur.com/qoAggsG.png "hhh {<hhh]")
Do you go all in and challenge Meltzer's word officially? Frankie and Dave leave just enough space for skepticism, maybe...
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2013
- Messages
- 30,389
- Reaction score
- 1
Hey dipshit
I posted the audio in that link
Here is the screencap
Here it is again -
Also here it is without the http:// (in case you are on a shit phone)
vocaroo.com/i/s097RBMgqGZ8
& as a download - LINK
Now its obvious you are a nitwit that gets his "feels" hurt, but lets see if you are a man of his word
You have THREE ways to hear the audio that magically you couldn't hear (yet others can)
NOW GO GET YOUR SHINEBOX!
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2013
- Messages
- 30,389
- Reaction score
- 1
I feel you. You can still play the "Meltzer's horseshit" card and try and get it overturned (or maybe an instant rematch), but how it's "lookin'" (and that's what the judges are here for baby)...
...is like Lindland vs. Bustamante.
Objectively, Meltzer's credible enough to make this at least 50/50. He's also not soooo deeply embedded that he can't make mistakes or not have specifics down to a T. But he's pretty accurate almost all of the time. And for 30+ years.
Do you go all in and challenge Meltzer's word officially? Frankie and Dave leave just enough space for skepticism, maybe...
He is going for the "there was no audio" card so I posted it THREE different ways
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2013
- Messages
- 30,389
- Reaction score
- 1
I posted the audio link
Funny how others heard it & I checked & it works
Now man up or not nitwit
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2005
- Messages
- 14,741
- Reaction score
- 6,511
holy shit this is one of the funniest gifs ive ever seen. The alpha brain made me lose it.
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2013
- Messages
- 30,389
- Reaction score
- 1
I feel you. You can still play the "Meltzer's horseshit" card and try and get it overturned (or maybe an instant rematch), but how it's "lookin'" (and that's what the judges are here for baby)...
...is like Lindland vs. Bustamante.
Objectively, Meltzer's credible enough to make this at least 50/50. He's also not soooo deeply embedded that he can't make mistakes or not have specifics down to a T. But he's pretty accurate almost all of the time. And for 30+ years.
Do you go all in and challenge Meltzer's word officially? Frankie and Dave leave just enough space for skepticism, maybe...
You know what
Maybe you are right & he is discrediting the guy that has covered MMA since UFC 1
If so, it proves he is a tool
He began by saying "I misunderstood" what I heard/read. Then I had Dave verify & it was "too vague" & then I posted the audio which said it clearly
He might be playing games
Lets see if he mans up (or not)
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2010
- Messages
- 26,293
- Reaction score
- 17,802
The deal still stands. If you aren't slow, lets read it again. I want you to point out the part you don't understand:
I'll make you a deal.
If you can provide a source - ANY of the big MMA blogs - that filed a story reporting Dana White owns 7% stock (not revenue share, but stock) of the UFC, I will PayPal you $100.
Lets agree MMAFighting, MMAJunkie, BloodyElbow, ESPN, all acceptable sources. I'll even take Bloomberg.
Free money if you're right, just post it here.
If you can't collect your $100, zip it. You can't post rumors on Sherdog without a source - you know this.
-----------------------
My contention is that Dana White owning 7% company stock in a 4 billion dollar valuation company is news worthy. There would be reports filed if this was substantiated. I'm willing to take a report filed on ANY of the listed MMA sites, and threw in Bloomberg.
You and me both now you cannot take rumors from a subscription radio show - this is not acceptable at face value, I shouldn't have to explain it.
You can't give me a source though, because that report has never been filed.
You are a world class ding-dong.
For anyone else reading - both ESPN and MMAFighting have filed reports stating that Dana does NOT own stock, rather has a 9% revenue share deal. I actually have sources, unlike this moron:
http://www.mmafighting.com/2016/7/1...tes-deal-with-new-ufc-ownership-pays-him-9-of
