News *** Conor McGregor Found Civilly Liable for 2018 Sexual Assault MEGA THREAD ***

[Ares Black]

I just dont spend my life crying and being emotional about people who clearly dont deserve it when there are actual people who are victims and are being taken advantage of, none of that was present in this case, i think you might be a bit too serious instead of being a sherdog lawyer

You just don't care about what actually happened and want to pretend that's the mature thing to do. You clearly haven't been following the case particularly closely.

In real life good people don't condone rape.

 

[krelianx]

Bigot piece if shit??? What's with the random senseless personal attacks you sensitive puss.

From what I read, her own friend was testifying for the defense. There were many other details that make the case seem not so black and white.

And how the hell does any of this make me a bigiot???

You diluted and distorted what happened by calling it "freaky threesome sex". There was no threesome, and she was battered, badly injured. So for you to even describe the situation in those terms shows you are a dimwitted bigot.

 

[krelianx]

See you in 2 years from now when Conor is still rich and doing well

"Still doing well."

He's not well, and has not been well. He is unwell. Because is human garbage. And you, for whatever reason, of all the great people and athletes there are to admire for good reasons, have managed to become a hardcore fan of one of the biggest scumbags in sports history.

 

[krelianx]

I mean, yeah, I suppose most situations will appear as a 'he said she said,' as long as you continue doing your best impression of an ostrich by keeping your dumbass head buried in the dirt. And like you said, people are only proven guilty in the court of law, except the court of law is incredibly fallible, so then you can pretend people aren't guilty even after that. I guess it all just depends on who you want to make excuses of innocence for.

Possibility comes cheap.

Maybe we are all living in a simulation and our actions are actually orchestrated and determined by the will of architect-aliens. Perhaps free will is an illusion and a deterministic universe simply entails whatever happened had to happen. Maybe Nikita Hand did in fact consent to have a tampon encrusted up her vagina and getting battered up since people have very odd fetishes on this Earth. Maybe she inflicted all these injuries onto herself! Or maybe she asked her boyfriend to beat her up and have violent sex with her, with a condom so his DNA wouldn't interfere with Conor's.

So many possibilities...

 

[dogsdonutsdragons]

I mean, yeah, I suppose most situations will appear as a 'he said she said,' as long as you continue doing your best impression of an ostrich by keeping your dumbass head buried in the dirt. And like you said, people are only proven guilty in the court of law, except the court of law is incredibly fallible, so then you can pretend people aren't guilty even after that. I guess it all just depends on who you want to make excuses of innocence for.

nothing is very conclusive and its better to take the opinion that you dont know. seen to many innocent people "proven" guilty.

 

[Ares Black]

nothing is very conclusive

Not conclusive, but it is convincing

and its better to take the opinion that you dont know.

No, it isn't

In this case there is a choice between two stories. One is plausible. The other is not.

Saying you don't know is just a lazy way of avoiding having to make a decision about which person is lying.

Do I know for a fact that Conor McGregor assaulted Nikita Hand. No, I do not. But it seems very, very likely that he did.

seen to many innocent people "proven" guilty.

Have you though?

 

[oscerthegrouch]

question why wasn't its criminal trial then? Here in the US Civil means jack shit... because the Burden of proof is none existent.. VS Criminal cases.. i havent followed the case but i know in Civil trial he said she said enough.. which is crazy

 

[Mohawk Banditó]

nothing is very conclusive and its better to take the opinion that you dont know. seen to many innocent people "proven" guilty.

Feeling unsure is one thing, but to describe a situation as a "he said, she said" when the "she said" includes multiple medical testimonies seems purposefully misleading, and appeals to false equivalence

Like this dope

question why wasn't its criminal trial then? Here in the US Civil means jack shit... because the Burden of proof is none existent.. VS Criminal cases.. i havent followed the case but i know in Civil trial he said she said enough.. which is crazy

it's not non existent, it just goes from "no reasoble doubt that it happened" to "is it more reasonable that it happened" and the court for that it was more likely it did

 

[dogsdonutsdragons]

Not conclusive, but it is convincing

No, it isn't

In this case there is a choice between two stories. One is plausible. The other is not.

Saying you don't know is just a lazy way of avoiding having to make a decision about which person is lying.

Do I know for a fact that Conor McGregor assaulted Nikita Hand. No, I do not. But it seems very, very likely that he did.

Have you though?

i personally did jury duty a few times and in the end i did not feel confident in any decision but people were and it seemed like they just based it off personal bias based on how the guy looked and talked. i at least without very clear evidence in these cases just don't believe it to be true or false.

 

[krelianx]

i personally did jury duty a few times and in the end i did not feel confident in any decision but people were and it seemed like they just based it off personal bias based on how the guy looked and talked. i at least without very clear evidence in these cases just don't believe it to be true or false.

Except this case is not particularly ambiguous. There is simply no good explanation as to how Nikita Hand sustained those injuries other than being battered and raped.

What plausible alternative explanation is there?

 

[GoshiShun17]

You diluted and distorted what happened by calling it "freaky threesome sex". There was no threesome, and she was battered, badly injured. So for you to even describe the situation in those terms shows you are a dimwitted bigot.

Did I say "freaky threesome sex" anywhere in my post? You must be conflating my post with someone else's

 

[krelianx]

Did I say "freaky threesome sex" anywhere in my post?

You responded to

Woman has consensual freaky threesome with rich people while intoxicated. After sobering up, she realizes she can get a lot of cash out of the situation and exploits the system. Sad times.

By saying "This is what it seems like".

Now, maybe it's my really wild imagination running wild, but when people say "that is what it seems like" it is an expression of agreement with what the statement that that refers to.

But maybe it's just my warped understanding of language.

 

[Neck&Neck]

 

[JPOMMA]

I’m going to buy up a case so I can flip it on eBay to some Conor stans when the brand goes defunct

Smartest guy in the room

 

[JPOMMA]

Is it me or Hand and her bf look like a Temu version of Dee and McG?