News *** Conor McGregor Found Civilly Liable for 2018 Sexual Assault MEGA THREAD ***

normally i abide by my forum signature but i just had to weigh in here

i dont know how anyone would be surprised that McGoober would be found liable. he admitted to having sex with the woman.
 
Does this mean that we won't see McGregor in more MMA fights in 2025?
Dee probably isn't going to throwing anything out any windows, despite being well within her rights, even before this case.
 
None of the apologia the worthless gutter trash in this thread are already trying to offer will ever wash this stain off.

That's why this verdict matters.

The despicable c*nt will never face the justice he truly deserves, but it's still finally a genuine consequence that will do him a lot of damage.
 
Hold on

A, "guilt" in a civil case does not mean the same as "guilt" in a criminal case; in a civil case, the standard is "liability" rather than "guilt," and the burden of proof is lower, requiring only a "preponderance of the evidence" instead of "beyond a reasonable doubt" as in a criminal case; essentially, a person can be found "liable" in a civil case even if they were found "not guilty" in a related criminal case.

THere are a lot of women who prey on millionaires and do this same thing. A woman who only wants to go to civil case is a big red flag. She should want a criminal case not civil.
She tried that first.
 
Dee probably isn't going to throwing anything out any windows, despite being well within her rights, even before this case.



You may or may not be thinking of another user when you replied to my message, Prologue.
 
So he didn't pay a porn star hush money? I mean, it's pretty weak in terms of a felony, but how do you know it's fake?
I honestly don't know much about the whole porn star deal, was talking more about his propped up charges of document extraction, impeachment and all that bs; the porn star charge whatever that may be will just qualify into the same category . How do I know they are fake? Because I understand the game from a higher perspective, delve into esoteric understanding of things, and the structure of control that is being presented to a casual participant.
 
much lower burden of proof in a civil case
Exactly.
"In correspondence, Ms Hand suggested that the DPP was not prosecuting because one of the suspects was a famous person. In response, the DPP's office said the Director herself had reviewed the file, that the case was very complex and that there was no reasonable prospect of conviction for either man."
That dumb whore who was trying to bury pereira's name probably could've won a civil case
<Fedor23>
 
I honestly don't know much about the whole porn star deal, was talking more about his propped up charges of document extraction, impeachment and all that bs; the porn star charge whatever that may be will just qualify into the same category . How do I know they are fake? Because I understand the game from a higher perspective, delve into esoteric understanding of things, and the structure of control that is being presented to a casual participant.
Well that sounds like the biggest load of crap I've ever heard lol.
 
Back
Top