News *** Conor McGregor Found Civilly Liable for 2018 Sexual Assault MEGA THREAD ***

[Conan the K-9]

Weird how people try and deflect about Conor being a rapist

I have zero interest in defending Conor, I just find it very hypocrite that suddenly someone wants to raise money for just his victim, while same shit and worse happens every day. Almost like it’s personal?

 

[Ares Black]

You do get it, that is what is going on.

She said both people raped her.
Jury believes Conor did but not the other guy.

Conor pays her and she pays Lawrence. Could end up costing her a lot more potentially.

That's not at all what happened

 

[Snoowpy]

Was chatting to a friend who is a former fighter and fought in the same circuit as mcgregor coming up

He has mutual friends and he's adamant conor didn't do it. I mentioned the injuries, he said no idea how they occurred but she was apparently in great spirits following the supposed attack, as per cctv

Maybe he's biased? But is Conor 100% guilty? I'm not certain

I suppose I am just a filthy rape apologist too for trying to look at all the facts

Social shaming is how these weaklings thought police. Historically used by Females in group settings to regulate opinions.

1. Enforcing Moral and Social Norms​

Women frequently acted as custodians of cultural and moral values. By publicly shaming individuals who deviated from accepted norms—such as violating marriage vows, engaging in unethical behavior, or failing in communal duties—they helped maintain the group's moral fabric. This form of social regulation was crucial in small communities where informal mechanisms were primary means of governance.

 

[Ares Black]

Social shaming is how these weaklings thought police. Historically used by Females in group settings to regulate opinions.

You want to be a victim so badly. We are shaming you because you should be ashamed of yourself.

Inside Court 24: How Nikita Hand took on Conor McGregor and won

A jury of eight women and four men were asked who they believe over the course of the three-week civil trial.

www.thejournal.ie

 

[Ares Black]

The real victim in this whole situation is the chick’s boyfriend.

There can be multiple victims of a crime.

I agree, what happened to the primary victim's boyfriend is absolutely awful. One of the worst things a man can experience, if he really loved her.

 

[WarDronx]

So many subhuman garbage came out of their trash cans in response to this case... Anything more I add would just get me banned so I'll just say kudos for your patience to the posters that still try to reason or just make fun of these irredeemable beings.

 

[Dana's Moonface]

Guilty until proven innocent

 

[Intermission]

No one can be "found guilty" in a CIVIL case.

OJ Simpson had to pay out expenses after losing the civil case. He was broke but he was technically demanded to do so

 

[Snoowpy]

You want to be a victim so badly. We are shaming you because you should be ashamed of yourself.

Inside Court 24: How Nikita Hand took on Conor McGregor and won

A jury of eight women and four men were asked who they believe over the course of the three-week civil trial.

www.thejournal.ie

It is what you're doing though, no? Let's be honest for a second. You employed many shaming tactics.


As for the Article:

Comparative Analysis​

The core issue for the jury was to decide between the credibility of the complainant and the accused, given that the case rested on opposing accounts of the same events. Both parties introduced points of doubt:

• For Hand: Her lying to her boyfriend and memory gaps regarding Lawrence undermine the absolute clarity of her account. However, forensic and medical evidence corroborates her claim of injuries and the presence of a tampon, lending weight to her overall narrative.
• For McGregor: His evasiveness, dismissive demeanor, and contradictions between his account and the physical evidence weaken his position. His failure to produce corroborative evidence, such as phone records, further diminishes his credibility.

Tampon as Evidence

1. While forensic evidence confirmed the presence of a tampon, it remains unexplained how McGregor and Lawrence both testified to not noticing it. This creates a contradiction between physical evidence and opposing testimonies.
2. The assertion that she would “never have sex with a tampon in” may appear self-evident to some, but this is ultimately subjective and relies on her assertion rather than an immutable fact.
   

However, both parties display weaknesses that necessitate careful consideration of the balance of probabilities rather than absolute certainties.

The jury’s decision ultimately reflects this balance, favoring evidence over conjecture.

Like I said earlier, if you balance out the evidence there are a lot of loose ends on both sides. Just like I said. They are both drugged out degenerates. Once again, not saying he did not do it. I'm saying there are a lot of weird loose ends to the narrative.

 

[Fergelmince]

No one can be "found guilty" in a CIVIL case.

OJ Simpson had to pay out expenses after losing the civil case. He was broke but he was technically demanded to do so

Exactly. They found him civilly liable, not guilty.

 

[MarioLemieux]

Oh no Conor apologists he lost his businesses and now his social media is dwindling

Conor McGregor suffers yet another fresh blow in wake of jury ruling

Conor McGregor has seen his social media following drop significantly since he was found liable in a civil lawsuit for assaulting and battery against Nikita Hand

www.irishstar.com

 

[Prex32]

Me2 is a scam

 

[Ares Black]

It is what you're doing though, no? Let's be honest for a second. You employed many shaming tactics.


As for the Article:

Yes, obviously neither person is telling the whole truth, especially considering both of them were drunk and coked up on a bender.

The truth is somewhere in the middle, but every rational observer would think that her version of events is more plausible than his.


Fundamentally, the question is this.

Does Conor McGregor bear any responsibility for the injuries that were inflicted on the accuser?

Nikita Hand was very badly injured and suffered a great deal of physical and emotional pain. That is not debatable.

Do you think Conor McGregor is partially responsible for those injuries? Is what he did illegal? Should he be punished for his behaviour?

No one is saying she is an innocent victim. She was a fucked up party girl on a bender who was partying with a millionaire. But what happened to her is a crime. Unless you can come up with a better explanation for her injuries than Conor McGregor having a coked-out violent sex with a semiconscious party girl and then trying to pin it on his retarded friend.

Neither party is blameless in this situation, no matter what happened that night.

But if you honestly think that Conor McGregor shouldn't be punished for his bad behaviour, then you are not a serious person. He sucks, and what is happening to him now is entirely deserved, and more IMO.

Should Nikita Hand be punished for her bad behaviour too? Well, she already was. Her life has been very difficult for years because of this.

I don't believe she is making it all up as a cash grab. That's a terrible way to make a living.

I think she is a fucked up party girl who started sobering up and realized that she was badly hurt and needed to go to the hospital because of what had happened to her. She realized that Conor McGregor was responsible for her pain and wanted him to face justice for ignoring her not wanting vaginal sex because she was on her period.

Would she have done other stuff? Of course, I'm sure she has all sorts of consensual sexual behaviour with him at various points.

But the injuries that she suffered are horrifying, and you cannot convince me, or any rational observer, that they were the result of consensual sex. That is sexual violence, and that is... Hear me out... Fucking illegal.



Imagine we aren't talking about Conor McGregor, we are just talking about a random guy.


A random guy is with a random woman. They are both highly intoxicated with cocaine and alcohol. They are messing around and start having sex. The sex is painful, so the random woman decides she wants to stop. The random dude does not stop, but instead gets angry that she would dare tell him to stop. He then has very violent sex with her that requires medical attention and causes physical and emotional trauma.

Is what that random guy did a crime?

 

[pamirec]

There can be multiple victims of a crime.

I agree, what happened to the primary victim's boyfriend is absolutely awful. One of the worst things a man can experience, if he really loved her.

We can’t really say she was raped for sure, can we? But it sucks for the dude. Had she been raped like she was kidnapped and forced to have sex, that’s one thing. A consensual sex turned into rape(allegedly) is a different shit. As if it wasn’t bad enough, dude also finds out that his chick had gone with the alleged offender’s friend and spent hours with him.

 

[Snoowpy]

Yes, obviously neither person is telling the whole truth, especially considering both of them were drunk and coked up on a bender.

The truth is somewhere in the middle, but every rational observer would think that her version of events is more plausible than his.


Fundamentally, the question is this.

Does Conor McGregor bear any responsibility for the injuries that were inflicted on the accuser?

Nikita Hand was very badly injured and suffered a great deal of physical and emotional pain. That is not debatable.

Do you think Conor McGregor is partially responsible for those injuries? Is what he did illegal? Should he be punished for his behaviour?

No one is saying she is an innocent victim. She was a fucked up party girl on a bender who was partying with a millionaire. But what happened to her is a crime. Unless you can come up with a better explanation for her injuries than Conor McGregor having a coked-out violent sex with a semiconscious party girl and then trying to pin it on his retarded friend.

Neither party is blameless in this situation, no matter what happened that night.

But if you honestly think that Conor McGregor shouldn't be punished for his bad behaviour, then you are not a serious person. He sucks, and what is happening to him now is entirely deserved, and more IMO.

Should Nikita Hand be punished for her bad behaviour too? Well, she already was. Her life has been very difficult for years because of this.

I don't believe she is making it all up as a cash grab. That's a terrible way to make a living.

I think she is a fucked up party girl who started sobering up and realized that she was badly hurt and needed to go to the hospital because of what had happened to her. She realized that Conor McGregor was responsible for her pain and wanted him to face justice for ignoring her not wanting vaginal sex because she was on her period.

Would she have done other stuff? Of course, I'm sure she has all sorts of consensual sexual behaviour with him at various points.

But the injuries that she suffered are horrifying, and you cannot convince me, or any rational observer, that they were the result of consensual sex. That is sexual violence, and that is... Hear me out... Fucking illegal.



Imagine we aren't talking about Conor McGregor, we are just talking about a random guy.


A random guy is with a random woman. They are both highly intoxicated with cocaine and alcohol. They are messing around and start having sex. The sex is painful, so the random woman decides she wants to stop. The random dude does not stop, but instead gets angry that she would dare tell him to stop. He then has very violent sex with her that requires medical attention and causes physical and emotional trauma.

Is what that random guy did a crime?

We can’t really say she was raped for sure, can we? But it sucks for the dude. Had she been raped like she was kidnapped and forced to have sex, that’s one thing. A consensual sex turned into rape(allegedly) is a different shit. As if it wasn’t bad enough, dude also finds out that his chick had gone with the alleged offender’s friend and spent hours with him.

Both good posts. The first time you went in without shaming and engaged. I share Pamirecs view. To convict someone it has to be more than a 60/40 call in favor of Nikita. If that makes sense. It's why I am constantly claiming there are a lot of loose ends. We need a better and more deeper investigation.

 

[Dana's Moonface]

Oh no Conor apologists he lost his businesses and now his social media is dwindling

Conor McGregor suffers yet another fresh blow in wake of jury ruling

Conor McGregor has seen his social media following drop significantly since he was found liable in a civil lawsuit for assaulting and battery against Nikita Hand

www.irishstar.com

60k from 47 million isn't many

 

[Intermission]

Exactly. They found him civilly liable, not guilty.

Oh I see what you are saying now. Prison is not an option

 

[Fergelmince]

Oh I see what you are saying now. Prison is not an option

There's a glaring distinction between civil courts and criminal courts.

 

[BoomStronk]

And this is in Sweden where if you put your finger in a girls vayay without consent its rape / sexual assault.

... dude. What the fuck? That is ABSOLUTELY rape/sexual assault. By definition.

 

[lsa]

... dude. What the fuck? That is ABSOLUTELY rape/sexual assault. By definition.

Yes.
Did I say it was not?

Based on some posters in this thread, DNA, witness statements from doctors, EMTs, injuries, tampon needed removal with forceps, is not rape /sexual assault.