- Joined
- Jan 26, 2017
- Messages
- 24,971
- Reaction score
- 52,758
Yeah, the judge said the sexual assault claim was surrounding an argument of rape. And they ultimately found Conor liable.He wasn't saying it was rape, he was saying that's what she was claiming and he wanted everyone to know that.
That was not the context. Some youtube interviewer (in a very at home setting, Tyson in bed, not some event or big media thing, and well after his boxing career was wrapped up) said Tyson doesn't need to violate any woman at any point in time and Tyson cut him off to say "I'm not above violating a woman. But I didn't violate that woman. That's just keeping it real. That's just keeping it real. Especially back then, back then I wasn't above violating and taking pussy and stuff, but I didn't take hers."Tyson plays a character but you don't seem to understand that. Teddy atlas just talked about him playing that character on his last podcast.
I could say I violated my wife last night.. doesn't mean I raped her
Have a great day stewie
Last edited:


