- Joined
- Apr 6, 2009
- Messages
- 16,353
- Reaction score
- 12,542
I have had the same stance feom the beginning there is no tying in knots I am answering multiple people who are all trying to present these different equations when the answer is simple. If a woman can prove she was intoxicated which I have said 50 times and based on the video evidence it seems as Conor was leading her to a private area to engage in elicit activity being as it is not normal behavior, then he is done. Again I invite you to debate me directly not sit back talking about convo I had with someone else lying as if I switched stances. Approach me like a man or shut your ass up
I have had the same stance feom the beginning there is no tying in knots I am answering multiple people who are all trying to present these different equations when the answer is simple. If a woman can prove she was intoxicated which I have said 50 times and based on the video evidence it seems as Conor was leading her to a private area to engage in elicit activity being as it is not normal behavior, then he is done. Again I invite you to debate me directly not sit back talking about convo I had with someone else lying as if I switched stances. Approach me like a man or shut your ass up
There's nothing to debate. The burden of proof is on the prosecution. It's a about what a prosecutor can prove in court. Period.