Breh. She was going back to his hotel room with him. She didn't "not comprehend" what happened, but whatever happened, she comprehended that she could make up some lies and get paid. The released video already debunks how she was "forced into the bathroom by security" and Conor ambushed her from a handicap stall with a security guard watching. They've already had to pivot on the story because the first piece of evidence undermines her veracity.
Not sure what you're on about, drunker is a word.
An intoxicated man and woman can engage in sexual intercourse. They can also consent to it. They can also initiate it, accept advances of it, and participate in it and none of it is rape. Otherwise anytime you and your wife share a few glasses of wine you're mutually raping each other.
What you can't do is get someone sloppy drunk and wait for them to pass out or unable to overcome their objections due to intoxication and proceed anyway. This silliness of "you can't consent if you've drank" is pure fiction.
You literally have no idea what the letter or spirit of the law is, which varies by degrees from state to state.
He has no idea what he's talking about. He's making things up.
Drunk people give consent all the time. Drunk patients in the ER consent to treatment, we never utilize implied consent with someone who can speak for themselves just because they're intoxicated.
