- Joined
- Feb 27, 2008
- Messages
- 17,056
- Reaction score
- 0
Alan Derschowitz is a zillion year old hack.
Age has nothing to do with it; also he's the youngest-ever professor of law at Harvard.
If you're more accomplished then I'd love to hear about it.
Alan Derschowitz is a zillion year old hack.
Cuckservatives: believe study claiming they are alpha, deny studies proving climate change.Beat me to it.
Studies show that Libs are Low-T and they are now proving that they don't even have intelligence to fall back on. How pathetic are Nu-Males? Do they have any redeeming qualities at all?
Trump could have just pardoned Flynn if he wanted and he still wouldn't be guilty of obstruction of justice.
CNN (and the rest of mainstream media) has been lying to you and your frail little mind is susceptible to propaganda. Keep grasping.
Cuckservatives: believe study claiming they are alpha, deny studies proving climate change.
"The scandal of Donald Trump’s alleged ties to Russia deepened on Thursday when James Comey, the man he fired as director of the FBI, branded the US president a liar."The guy asked the FBI director to stop investigating Flynns ties to Russia. Comey has made it clear, Flynn had shady ties to Russia.
Both of those are clear as day, and you think this works for Trump because legally he's safe? You're absolutely right.
Because clearly his supporters are spineless bitches with no principles or morality, and as long as the man stays out of jail, they'll defend him.
That kind of blind loyalty is usually only seen with beaten whores and their pimps.
Daft bullshit from you as usual, to wit:I called it. The libs are now just hanging on to Comeys interpretation of Trumps eyebrow movement, although he 'could be wrong', as proof of something guilty or nefarious.
They bought into to all this fake news for months and now refuse to let it go.
The thing is, alpha theory is absolute fringe science mostly pushed forward by scammers selling selfhelp booksCuckservatives: believe study claiming they are alpha, deny studies proving climate change.
I saw a lot of posts today from Trump defenders that read like a sigh of relief, acting like Comey's testimony wasn't that damning after all. But I'm not sure that's too close to what actually played out. Comey stopped short of saying Trump deliberately obstructed justice, but he was never in a position to make that call. What Comey said was essential what we already knew happened. (Oh, yeah, I remember when a bunch of Trumpsters were like show me the evidence! about the Memo).
Anyways, the real surprise was how personal Comey was. I've always thought he was a straight shooter, and in my eyes, he basically ripped Trump apart. Check out this sample video. It looks pretty damning to me. And does NOT take Obstruction off the table.
https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/po...sion=vhs-heading&module=vhs®ion=title-area
Daft bullshit from you as usual, to wit:
"Asked whether he thought Trump had tried to obstruct justice or merely seek a way for Mike Flynn to save face,Comey replied: “I don’t think it’s for me to say whether the conversation I had with the president was an effort to obstruct. I took it as a very disturbing thing and very concerning, but that’s a conclusion that I’m sure the special counsel will work towards to try and understand what the intention was there and whether that’s an offence.”"
If you're talking about this bit,
"He also discussed a meeting in the Oval Office in February, when Trump allegedly cleared the room of officials, including the attorney general, and discussed the investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn’s links to Russia. “I hope you can let this go,” Trump allegedly said."
"“The reason I keep saying his words is, I took it as a direction. This is the president of the United States. I took it as a direction.”"
It's fucking obvious when he fired Comey and said himself it was over the investigation, that Comey was right when he says he took it as a directive because he obviously paid the price for ignoring it. You're going to have a hard time convincing me this isn't obvious to you.
I thought this was pretty funny:
"Deputy press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders told reporters: “I can definitively say the president is not a liar. I think it is frankly insulting that question would be asked.”"
What fucking planet does she live on? He's been caught in outright lies more times than she has masturbated with all the money she is getting out of selling out her own country.
Edit:
I wonder that people are making so much of Trump not individually being under investigation. I think it's obvious the intent is to investigate the most obvious suspects and look for ties to Trump in order to draw a clear and obvious line from A to B. They can always say anything they uncover is in the course of investigating these other people, Flynn, et al. so they don't have to "investigate him" per se.
"The critical aspect of an obstruction case is assessing the intent...
I saw a lot of posts today from Trump defenders that read like a sigh of relief, acting like Comey's testimony wasn't that damning after all. But I'm not sure that's too close to what actually played out. Comey stopped short of saying Trump deliberately obstructed justice, but he was never in a position to make that call. What Comey said was essential what we already knew happened. (Oh, yeah, I remember when a bunch of Trumpsters were like show me the evidence! about the Memo).
Anyways, the real surprise was how personal Comey was. I've always thought he was a straight shooter, and in my eyes, he basically ripped Trump apart. Check out this sample video. It looks pretty damning to me. And does NOT take Obstruction off the table.
https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/po...sion=vhs-heading&module=vhs®ion=title-area
"I have no doubt Russia meddled in our election", sounds like all's clear to meNo. Rational is going on for months about a fake Russia story with no evidence and the when that falls apart....LARPing and pretending that obstruction of justice will be a thing
The left is made up of a bunch of delusional LARPers now. Congrats
"Wasn't", not "isn't"...Pretty typical headline games.
The story was:
Comey says Trump wasn't under investigation and Russia claims are untrue.
Instead we get:
DRumpf asked for Loyalty!
Sick burn man sick..Back to back tours in Afghanistan and Iraq, and a law degree. How bout you bitch?
You know what you bag licking Trump boys are hanging on to?I called it. The libs are now just hanging on to Comeys interpretation of Trumps eyebrow movement, although he 'could be wrong', as proof of something guilty or nefarious.
They bought into to all this fake news for months and now refuse to let it go.