Meh, doesn't take away from my point. Wouldn't surprise me if "If every voter had to show they were educated past highschool, no election would be close" going in the other direction, but saying something like that is just some attempted smear job on a part of the voter base which has a valuable voice worth hearing. The whole point of a modern Democracy is that everybody gets heard, not that we start valuing people based on things like income and all that.
But ultimately, what is your end game here? Are we going back to a "wealthy landowner" standard for Democracy? Is this just some general smear against the low-income voters? Wouldn't you say that the low earners are an important part of our Democracy as well? Not trying to put words in your mouth, but what are you really getting at with this thread?