Nate Silver said:Initial polls conducted after the Democratic National Convention suggest that Hillary Clinton has received a convention bounce. In fact, it appears likely that Clinton’s bounce will exceed Donald Trump’s, which measured at 3 to 4 percentage points. Thus, Clinton will potentially exit the conventions in a stronger position than she entered them, perhaps also making up for some of the ground she lost to Trump earlier in July.
Guest brings up extremely valid point about how Trump is changing the outlook of the Republicanew party by wanting to punish American companies for moving out of the country and Mahr responds with 'yeah well he wanted to punish women for getting abortions"
What a complete and utter fucking tool bag.
Not true according to the RCP graph. Trump's support has fallen slightly more than Hillary's has increased though.If you look at the numbers, she hasn't moved up at all, trump's numbers are going back down.
Not true according to the RCP graph. Trump's support has fallen slightly more than Hillary's has increased though.
Maybe we're not looking at the same thing. Here's the current 14-day RCP average. Measured from her high point following the RNC, yeah that's .2%.According to the graph, Clinton has increased by 0.2% while Trump fell by 3.1%
Maybe we're not looking at the same thing. Here's the current 14-day RCP average. Measured from her high point following the RNC, yeah that's .2%.
![]()
Cool that makes sense.I meant to say from last week, which was the start of the DNC
I meant to say from last week, which was the start of the DNC
It makes sense only if you ignore that you're comparing Trump's pre-convention polling against his post-convention bump vs. Clinton's post-Trump bump vs. her post-convention bump. Apples and oranges.Cool that makes sense.
Agreed, I just didn't know what he was comparing there. Hillary's numbers have to go up from here simply because Trump's prior rising polls will fall off the average, Hillary's bump should drive her way up, and then her numbers should settle down a little in a couple weeks.It makes sense only if you ignore that you're comparing Trump's pre-convention polling against his post-convention bump vs. Clinton's post-Trump bump vs. her post-convention bump. Apples and oranges.
Makes more sense to compare their respective pre-convention polling (as in both conventions) vs. their post-convention polling from their respective polls. This measures the effectiveness of punch-counterpunch.
Silver does that in the article I mentioned. Hillary is going to storm back to her June peaks, and maybe transcend them if he can't shut his mouth about Russian hackers, American Muslim soldiers, abortion, and how he was never interested in the Koch brother money because he is, like, deeply principled about money and would never take their dough.
The wikileaks came and went dude. Fact is, it wasn't quite as scandalous as it was made out to be. Very rude and vicious toward Bernie, but completely typical of inside party politics. In that context, it really wasn't bad, and people realize there wasn't actually a raging inferno in those leaks. That's not to say that future strategic leaks won't have crazy shit in them. If they do, it will affect the polls.msm doing a fine job of promoting this khan plant and completely ignoring the wikileaks .. I can see trump going down a bit but hc should be going way down if things were properly reported .. she has everyone backing her .. it's really disgusting watching the 'news' on tv .. I'll probably end up just bypassing it altogether and looking for the real news on the internet
msm doing a fine job of promoting this khan plant and completely ignoring the wikileaks .. I can see trump going down a bit but hc should be going way down if things were properly reported .. she has everyone backing her .. it's really disgusting watching the 'news' on tv .. I'll probably end up just bypassing it altogether and looking for the real news on the internet