- Joined
- Jan 23, 2012
- Messages
- 12,761
- Reaction score
- 8,842
An interim title should only be created when the champ is out for injury or illness or whatever reason that caused them to pull out of the initially scheduled title fight. I don't think interims should be made if there WASN'T a scheduled fight that the champion pulled out of like if the UFC wanted a champ to fight 2 months after their last fight and then make an interim title instead of waiting the few more months or whatever for a real title fight.Sir what exactly do you think an interim title is supposed to be?
By your logic we could just get rid of interim titles period and make vacant titles from the get go. Which fine, if that's what you want to do cool, but an interim title means you're the interim champion.
And guess what champions do? Hint: it's usually not fight other people for their belts. It's defending yours.
Essentially, the champ has to back out of the fight, and then the two other fighters fight for an interim and they get first chance at the champ when they return. But if it's taking a long time causing the interim champ to wait forever or the champ has to pull out yet again, the interim title should not be defended. What's the point of having two concurrent title holders each defending their titles? Either there's one champion above all the division or there's not. I see in another comment you don't agree that an interim title should be a glorified #1 contender, but that's how a lot of people think they should be treated.
They aren't useless, but I don't think making them their own storyline for multiple fights should be their purpose. It's a small window in which they should serve as a solution.