International Canadian Liberals confusingly scrap carbon tax they created

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 592570
  • Start date Start date
So is the GHGPPA / Carbon Tax; that doesnt mean Federal laws in Canada are not iron clad, there are amend and repeal parameters that a majority government can easily do. Furthermore outside of some broad stroke negotiations with BC, pharma act hasn't been negotiated with any other provinces and likely wil be challenged under the constitution act which delegates jurisdiction of heathcare to provinces.

So, obviously YOU don't know how government works.
You think the incoming Liberal majority is going to scrap the popular pharmacare and dental programs?

Ok
 
You think the incoming Liberal majority is going to scrap the popular pharmacare and dental programs?

Ok

Oh so laws can be repealed and replaced -- so your initial statement of iTs a Law, YoU DoNt KNoW GoVernMent was just you being your typical coke addict retardation?

And yes, the only reason PC and DC got passed is because NDP pushed for it as part of the coalition to save off a non confidence vote. It wasn't a Liberal driven initiative at all. Carneys whole MO is cut spending which has to involve programs people like and most likely be a lot of programs ushered in during the Trudeau era. And with NDP on track to lose official party status, thus relegated to backbenchers who don't get equal argument time - who is going to prevent a Liberal majority from cutting it; or at the very least stop expansion, lower the ceiling or ship jurisdiction to provinces?
 
Oh so laws can be repealed and replaced -- so your initial statement of iTs a Law, YoU DoNt KNoW GoVernMent was just you being your typical coke addict retardation?
Of course they can be. You said they would be.
And yes, the only reason PC and DC got passed is because NDP pushed for it as part of the coalition to save off a non confidence vote. It wasn't a Liberal driven initiative at all. Carneys whole MO is cut spending which has to involve programs people like and most likely be a lot of programs ushered in during the Trudeau era. And with NDP on track to lose official party status, thus relegated to backbenchers who don't get equal argument time - who is going to prevent a Liberal majority from cutting it; or at the very least stop expansion, lower the ceiling or ship jurisdiction to provinces?
If you think the incoming government is going to cut popular healthcare programs you are completely politically illiterate.

It was introduced by the NDP but it is also very popular with the Canadian people.
 
Of course they can be. You said they would be.
They most likely will be, or at the least severely altered. Carney has already confirmed he will be cutting spending and ending various taxes including middle class, housing carbon and eliminating the increases to capital gains tax. So what programs will be on the chopping block? Everyone programs is near and dear to the poverty class heart but I would bet you here and now a lot of the trudeau era initiatives are in his cross hairs.
If you think the incoming government is going to cut popular healthcare programs you are completely politically illiterate.

I would somewhat agree if they were universal and generationally established but DC and PC are heavily means tested and a massive amount of Canadians don't qualify. Also DC currently has less than 7% of the population covered and PC has zero. You could cancel both today and the vast majority of Canadians wouldn't even notice via their day to day costs.

Carneys tax cuts are going to be in the billions, non established and partly to minimally rolled out initiatives are absolutely going to be impacted

It was introduced by the NDP but it is also very popular with the Canadian people.

so popular that the champions of the legislation now face losing official party status and could end up with as little as 3 seats.
 
Last edited:
They most likely will be, or at the least severely altered. Carney has already confirmed he will be cutting spending and ending various taxes including middle class, housing carbon and eliminating the increases to capital gains tax. So what programs will be on the chopping block? Everyone programs is near and dear to the poverty class heart but I would bet you here and now a lot of the trudeau era initiatives are in his cross hairs.
No, they really won't be
I would somewhat agree if they were universal and generationally established but DC and PC are heavily means tested and a massive amount of Canadians don't qualify. Also DC currently has less than 7% of the population covered and PC has zero. You could cancel both today and the vast majority of Canadians wouldn't even notice via their day to day costs.
You are assuming that Canadians only care about programs that directly help them. That simply isn't true.

The optics of cancelling dental care for the most vulnerable people in Canada would be absolutely terrible.
Carneys tax cuts are going to be in the billions, non established and partly to minimally rolled out initiatives are absolutely going to be impacted



so popular that the champions of the legislation now face losing official party status and could end up with as little as 3 seats.
The policies are popular.

The NDP is led by a lame duck leader and progressives will do whatever it takes to block Poilievre, even if it means holding our noses and voting for a banker.
 
No, they really won't be

You are assuming that Canadians only care about programs that directly help them. That simply isn't true.

The optics of cancelling dental care for the most vulnerable people in Canada would be absolutely terrible.

The policies are popular.

The NDP is led by a lame duck leader and progressives will do whatever it takes to block Poilievre, even if it means holding our noses and voting for a banker.

Ok...so what programs do you think are going to be cut? Established and fully in progress or barely rolled out? I'm willing to bet barely rolled out. But I'm willing to hear where you think they will make up the billions in tax cuts

Oh and he's not just a banker, but the head of a a major private equities / asset management firm...Basically the Canadian Blackrock. Those types of guys would never cut programs that benefit the dregs. They just registered in Bermuda for the umbrella drinks, not the massive tax breaks
 
Last edited:
Ok...so what programs do you think are going to be cut? Established and fully in progress or barely rolled out? I'm willing to bet barely rolled out. But I'm willing to hear where you think they will make up the billions in tax cuts

Oh and he's not just a banker, but the head of a a major private equities / asset management firm...Basically the Canadian Blackrock. Those types of guys would never cut programs that benefit the dregs. They just registered in Bermuda for the umbrella drinks, not the massive tax breaks
Well, I hope you have accepted the fact that Carney will most likely be the Prime Minister for the foreseeable future.

I will be very surprised if he cuts either program.

He's not perfect but he's a much better choice that Poilievre. Watching the collapse of that obnoxious little wanker's political career has been very satisfying.
 
Well, I hope you have accepted the fact that Carney will most likely be the Prime Minister for the foreseeable future.

I will be very surprised if he cuts either program.

He's not perfect but he's a much better choice that Poilievre. Watching the collapse of that obnoxious little wanker's political career has been very satisfying.

Yep, polling is what it is. And his platform is heavily pro tax cuts, pro spending cuts, pro private investment and business interest, pro capital gains. Also results in completely neutering progressives / ndp at the federal level; basically everything i wanted from the conservatives.

If that means he pays lips services to the trannies and other soy based social issues, fair trade


But again....what programs do you think will be cut to offset the billions in tax cuts?
 
Yep, polling is what it is. And his platform is heavily pro tax cuts, pro spending cuts, pro private investment and business interest, pro capital gains. Also results in completely neutering progressives / ndp at the federal level; basically everything i wanted from the conservatives.

If that means he pays lips services to the trannies and other soy based social issues, fair trade


But again....what programs do you think will be cut to offset the billions in tax cuts?
I guess we'll find out
 
No no...you being so knowledgeable on canadian government and politics, list off the federal programs that carney would cut to offset the cost of tax cuts?
I don't particularly give a shit. He is much better equipped to deal with the trade war, and I have no interest in talking politics with someone on my Ignore List.

That means I have filed you under Not Worth the Effort.
 
She called for election interference by a foreign power
The Liberals have never not interfered with an election when you factor in the control they have over state funded media.

Pushing false or misleading narratives like the security clearance issue, linking Pierre to MAGA for example.

If asking for a pause on tariffs is election interference, so is intentionally making the situation worse for political gain.
 
You are assuming that Canadians only care about programs that directly help them. That simply isn't trtrue.

the mass populace doesn't give a shit about senior's getting dental and pharmacare. Those are programs being paid for with borrowed dollars that the debt servicing is up to $40 billion a year.

People just want to own homes and eat well. They want a future for their children and a vacation once in a while.
 
Pushing false or misleading narratives like the security clearance issue, linking Pierre to MAGA for example.
Poilievre linked himself to MAGA and now it has blown up in his face
 
Former NDP Leader Tom Mulcair validating PP not getting security clearance. Pure Liberal games. Mulcair isn't stupid.

 
Former NDP Leader Tom Mulcair validating PP not getting security clearance. Pure Liberal games. Mulcair isn't stupid.



Mulclair had a good point and if you ever read Blacklocks (amazing publication but requires a subscription) they did a great piece of when Jagmeet was so irate over learning about the foreign spies working in parliament juxtaposed with how he refused to name names because he was now privy to the information.
 
Poilievre linked himself to MAGA and now it has blown up in his face
How exactly ? by being conservative ? has it ever occurred to you that Trudeau government failed in many similar ways that the Biden administration so of course they are going to be talking about similar things. People are concerned about the same issues wherever you go.

Pierre has never advocated for any of the antagonistic bullshit that Trump has put forth and has denied any link multiple times and has never given an endorsement. So please give me a detailed answer on how exactly he is linked to MAGA ?
 
Back
Top