• Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it.

Opinion California on fire

lol... you can't argue with lefties. If they're know they're wrong... there's two cards they play and jam their head in the sand

It's either
- Racism
- Climate Change

It's amazing how Climate Change is responsible for everything... lol. Like its a recent phenomenon and humans haven't been around for 10,000 years.

I live off Galveston Bay and my house should be underwater by now.... according to Al Gore and Greta... lol

The prediction in 2005 by climate change advocates is that sea level would rice by 0.8 to 2 inches by 2025. It has risen by about 3.5 inches.

How do you reconcile what you claim with the objective FACT that sea-level predictions made by climate-lefties in the mid 2000s turned out to UNDERESTIMATE the actual rise in sea level? Are you willing to admit you're wrong?

Nobody claimed that your house would be underwater by now, that's just a strawman you created.
 
Come on cd, the benefit from dei hiring has been recently seen in the LA Fire Department.

BTW, that's only if ya think benefit means "detriment to functional performance"


Those cows need to start lifting
 
Liberals love to prattle on about 'climate change', but rarely do you see them taking action to combat this seemingly imminent nuclear threat - they all still drive about, go on holidays, use oil-based products etc etc.

It's almost as if this is just yet another message that their submissive, low-testosterone-fuelled selves parrot.

To me the "climate change" excuse is nothing more than a cop out. It's a blanket nebulous term for any mismanagement on the accuser's part by passing blame to their political opponent without taking any blame for their own mismanagement.

LA county's base semi-arid biome climate hasn't changed in ages. Santa Ana winds were always an issue since before Santa Ana was even a name. At best you could argue that "climate change" might intensify these issues.

But "Climate Change" is not an excuse for bad planning and just plain bureaucratic malevolence.

To me, all these sleazy fake politicians are doing their best to crawl out of their mess by essentially saying it's the boogeyman's fault. Because the democrats love creating boogeymen terms to cover for their shit policies.

P.S: Republicans can be guilty of the same shit. But this is Newsom and Bass's mess were talking about.
 
Oh...... Here we go. This fire has Democrat failure written all over it.

The response time for the Palisade Fire was 45 minutes. And they knew the winds would cause high likelyhood of fires. How were more firetrucks and firemen not on standby. I mean, when hurricanes are incoming, the power companies stage a huge number linemen, power poles and trucks to be ready to go after the storm passes.

How in the fuck was the response time 45 minutes. It should be been minutes.

NFPA Standard 1710 establishes an 80 second “turnout time” and 240 second “travel time” (together, 320 seconds or 5 minutes and 20 seconds “response time”) benchmark time goal for not less than 90% of dispatched incidents (please click here and refer to Page 29 for a detailed description). The FEMS KPI measure for this benchmark time goal is the “percentage of structure fire calls when a first responding fire engine arrived in 5 minutes 20 seconds or less.”

Unfortunately, this fire is a series of multiple Democrat fuck ups that are going to lead to the worst fire in terms of damage in US history.

Insufficent staffing, late response time, inadequate water supply... Uncontrolled fire






Prison time isn't too much to ask for some of these Government Officials.

These people earn $300k on the low end... and almost $1 million on the high end.

And what the fuck are they doing? DEI initiatives?

L.A. fire officials could have put engines in the Palisades before the fire broke out. They didn’t​




LAFD bosses sent just 5 fire engines to Palisades Fire — while holding back 1,000 firefighters and 35 trucks in critical first hours​


Los Angeles fire bosses deployed just a fraction of its firefighters and trucks to the deadly Palisades Fire until it was already out of control — sending just five of the 40 available fire engines and holding back 1,000 firefighters, according to a damning new report.

The critical decisions — blasted by experts and ex-fire chiefs as a spate of “missteps” — were made even as extreme warnings were coming in about life-threatening winds that turned the blaze into the most destructive in Los Angeles history.

“You would have had a better chance to get a better result if you deployed those engines,” former LAFD Battalion Chief Rick Crawford told the Los Angeles Times.

“You give yourself the best chance to minimize how big the fire could get. … If you do that, you have the ability to say, ‘I threw everything at it at the outset.’”

That didn’t happen here,” he continued, adding the choices were part of a “domino effect of missteps” by officials.



This is one of the dumbfuck fire management experts...clown
 
Ally Carter said, pre-fire, deaths and fires were coming. Not time stamped, sorry.



Dei hires - TPTB pays corrupt politicians to execute evil plans/people, then to assign blame to incite hatred on dei's on top of the event's sorrow and pain, hiding the evil, intentional plan.

Insurance cancelled pre-fire?

@LeonardoBjj
- Put four of those firefighter on a Agusta Westland CH-149 Cormorant , and the chopper wouldn'd left the ground!

I can see the giant low income housing apartments going up all over those burn zones... well, except the big Democrat donor areas.
Maxine's NIMBY.
 
Last edited:
Climate change, decades long underfundeing of firefighting and infrastructure, people living in areas that are disaster prone, etc. There's no one easy answer or cause.

You don't seem to understand, there was no stopping water pressure from dropping in the Palisades, it's impossible for that kind of infrastructure to sustain during that bad of a wildfire.
Agree.
I would also just add along with underfunding we had mismanagement of current funds to such an extent more funding may not have helped.
 
kimmel is a fucking clown always crying about something
And on that note...

Hey Democrats, if you want to get back to some semblance of relevancy, please tell your men to stop crying over everything. It's fucking embarrassing. No, it is not a sign of "strength" to be a man and cry over everything. It's cringe pussy bullshit, that puts off everyone. Stop it. There will be no Oscar for your performance. Knock it off. Nobody wants to be led by a bunch of crying fairies.
 
Liberals love to prattle on about 'climate change', but rarely do you see them taking action to combat this seemingly imminent nuclear threat - they all still drive about, go on holidays, use oil-based products etc etc.

It's almost as if this is just yet another message that their submissive, low-testosterone-fuelled selves parrot.
I often think to myself “no on could be so god damn stupid as to still think that climate change is fake.” And then I see you posting
 
Agree.
I would also just add along with underfunding we had mismanagement of current funds to such an extent more funding may not have helped.
If we're falling mismanagement of funds enough to matter (ie tens of millions of dollars), it's possible that happened. But what you've cited is irrelevant to the scale of the problem and solutions we're talking about here.
 
This shit still burning? I am seeing live feeds from legit networks like CNN, ABC,FOX that show shit still burning. Anyone with eyes on the ground know if evacuations are still happening?

Can't tell if they are just showing previous shit on fire or if its new.
 
I often think to myself “no on could be so god damn stupid as to still think that climate change is fake.” And then I see you posting
why do you think to yourself about climate change ? that's kind of weird
 
Back
Top