Social California Jury acquits Registered Sex Offender accused of Exposing himself to minor girls at the WiSpa

You stating a view built on logical inconsistencies. When you use the, quite literally, same arguments made against those groups then it should lead you to believe that maybe you're approaching this from the wrong angle.

Maybe instead of dying on the hill of calling them mentally ill, as gays were, you can shift gears. Maybe explore conversations regarding better ways we can adjust to a society where trans people exist without over corrections, coddling, or discrimination. Find a functional middle ground.

You're falsely trying to lump homosexuality and gender dysphoria together. Homosexuality is not listed as a mental illness or condition under the DSM-5. In fact, it's not listed at all.

Gender dysphoria is still listed in the DSM.
 
That is obviously bad.

Not sure how outrage-worthy though when the president of the US should be a registered sex offender.
 
That is obviously bad.

Not sure how outrage-worthy though when the president of the US should be a registered sex offender.
No, you're right. Its fine. In fact, we should all show our dicks to kids.
 
It's very common for businesses to be hesitant about hiring a trans person for fear of them flipping out on somebody because they were mis-gendered or whatever and carry clear baggage with them.

Also, I absolutely 100% do not need a pyschologists to tell me someone who wants to chop their cock off is certifiably fucking insane.


It's already been revealed that employers regard stating your pronouns on your CV to be a massive red flag and that C.V goes straight into the bin. You know what type of person you're getting, and very few employers want that type of person in the workplace.
 
You're falsely trying to lump homosexuality and gender dysphoria together. Homosexuality is not listed as a mental illness or condition under the DSM-5. In fact, it's not listed at all.

Gender dysphoria is still listed in the DSM.
No, you just don't understand the topic you're speaking on. In fact, you are falsely lumping Gender Dysphoria with transgenderism. They are not the same thing. Both Homosexuality and what was then call "gender identity disorder " (which is not a thing) were both listed in previous versions of the DSM but were removed from the DSM 5 due to a lack of supporting evidence.

Gender Dysphoria effects people regardless of if you're trans or not. It is common in older men and women
 
No, you just don't understand the topic you're speaking on. In fact, you are falsely lumping Gender Dysphoria with transgenderism. They are not the same thing. Both Homosexuality and what was then call "gender identity disorder " (which is not a thing) were both listed in previous versions of the DSM but were removed from the DSM 5 due to a lack of supporting evidence.

I do know what I'm talking about. Homosexuality is not listed now. They took it out in the 80's.

As opposed to gender dysphoria which is still listed as a medical condition in the DSM.

And I completely reject your notion that you can be trans without gender dysphoria.
 
Homosexuality is not listed now. They took it out in the 80's.
Thanks for repeating what I just said as if you were saying something new.

As opposed to gender dysphoria which is still listed as a medical condition in the DSM.
And again...literally just repeating what I said.
And I completely reject your notion that you can be trans without gender dysphoria.
Of course you do, because you don't know what you're talking about. Thank you for wasting both of our time.



 
Thanks for repeating what I just said as if you were saying something new.


And again...literally just repeating what I said.

Of course you do, because you don't know what you're talking about. Thank you for wasting both of our time.



lol @ you knowing anything.
you're the absolute dipshit that was running around here claiming there's more than 2 sexes.
that's how dumb you are. your opinions are worthless.
 
lol @ you knowing anything.
you're the absolute dipshit that was running around here claiming there's more than 2 sexes.
that's how dumb you are. your opinions are worthless.
Oh wow, Fox crashing out at the sight of cited facts? Must be Tuesday.
 
lol @ facts. you were claiming there's more than 2 sexes. you can never speak about facts again about saying that kind of idiocy.
Yup keep crashing out and slinging insults in the absence of any evidence. I'll just be here, citing all of my claims with credible sources as usual.

Lmk when you're done throwing your temper tantrum.
 
Yup keep crashing out and slinging insults in the absence of any evidence. I'll just be here, citing all of my claims with credible sources as usual.

Lmk when you're done throwing your temper tantrum.
What credible sources do you have for the existence of more than 2 sexes?
cause you are one of the dumbest people on this forum, so most of the time you don't even understand what you're linking.

so, let's see the "credible sources" for the existence of more than 2 sexes.
come on now.
 
I do know what I'm talking about. Homosexuality is not listed now. They took it out in the 80's.

As opposed to gender dysphoria which is still listed as a medical condition in the DSM.

And I completely reject your notion that you can be trans without gender dysphoria.
And on that last point, you are completely wrong, as I demonstrated several times not long ago.

You cling to that belief because it serves your emotional and political needs, not because it’s true.


 
What credible sources do you have for the existence of 2 sexes?
cause you are one of the dumbest people on this forum, so most of the time you don't even understand what you're linking.

so, let's see the "credible sources" for the existence of 2 sexes.
come on now.
As always, deflecting from. The current topic because you know you're wrong. You know that im right about Gender Dysphoria and can't say otherwise because there are already listed facts showing that you're wong, so you're making a poor attempt at attacking my credibility instead. It must get exhausting running from facts and being a hyper emotional man child.

Intersexuality is a heavily discussed topic when looking at Gender Binaries. It fits into neither the male or female binary. While many do not lable it as a seperate sex , they also do not lable it within the existing binary(which is illogical). Thus there is much debate on the topic and on the way we define sex within a binary.

Since one of us has to be intellectually honest, and it obviously will never be you, I will admit that I over simplified the in previous conversations. I could and should have been more nuanced in my stance. So, I will amend that stance. My stance is as follows: The notion that there are only 2 sexes is often challenged due to the existence of intersex individuals. The way we define sex fails to account for known deviations.


This article touches on the flawed definition of sex.


This one covers the issue that arise from trying to force intersex children into the sex binary


This discusses how intersex fails to fit into the binary and why.


Break down of many reasons why Intersex does not fit into the binary.

There are a lot of good ones that are blacked behind a pay wall (university gives me access to them). You obviously won't read them because it doesn't fit your narrative but I encourage others to

I look forward to you addressing nothing and crashing out again.
 
Last edited:
And on that last point, you are completely wrong, as I demonstrated several times not long ago.

You cling to that belief because it serves your emotional and political needs, not because it’s true.


That's always what it boils down to for them. Feelings over facts
 
Back
Top