I definitely disagree here. When we punish criminals its not merely to get retribution or based on their likelihood of reoffending but also to deter future criminal acts. Sentencing Cain to only a year in prison is sending the wrong message with how recklessly he acted. In the future why wouldn't a parent in a similar situation take a shot at the accused if there's a chance they can get a relatively light punishment?
If anything we're already too lenient with reckless drivers and Cain not only drove recklessly he also discharged a firearm in public. Normally if all I knew about the defendant was that they tried to drive someone off the road and fired a gun at them from his car while on the highway I'd expect at least 15 years if not more so Cain getting 5-10 would be leniency IMO.
The obvious comparison to this case is that of
Gary Plauche who infamously shot his son's karate instructor who kidnapped and molested the boy but there are relevant details that make his case far more sympathetic. For one the guilt of the accused molester was far more clear and secondly he shot him at point blank range. Anything can happen when a gun is discharged but Plauche to me acted far less recklessly than Cain in a situation where there was far less doubt about the accused's guilt.
This makes Cain seem even worse. It looks like the case against the alleged child molester is not so strong and in fact these kinds of accusations against daycares are common and in many cases amount to nothing.