That's a good analogy. Not sure many people are complaining about it.Consider the prevention of male homosexuals from donating blood due to higher risk of disease. That is logical but is also viewed as discriminatory in the social sphere.
Consider the prevention of male homosexuals from donating blood due to higher risk of disease. That is logical but is also viewed as discriminatory in the social sphere.
Pretty sure you get tested before you can give blood so in that analgoy it really wouldnt matter
That's a good analogy. Not sure many people are complaining about it.
Well I agree with it, unless it's some type of catastrophe, then it's either infusion or die.It is one of the items that LGBT activists have taken on
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men_who_have_sex_with_men_blood_donor_controversy
Well I agree with it, unless it's some type of catastrophe, then it's either infusion or die.
I support a proper risk analysis absent of any political shenanigans.
This sounds dangerously close to a meritocracy type of idea and entirely lacking feeling based decision making. I'm not sure if this makes you abelist or fascist or scientistist or what, but, reported for triggering.
This sounds dangerously close to a meritocracy type of idea and entirely lacking feeling based decision making. I'm not sure if this makes you abelist or fascist or scientistist or what, but, reported for triggering.
He wears wayfarers in studio and has bro in his nameWhy do you think he's a douche? I mean, my douche tolerance is pretty low and I didn't find him douchey at all
Lol. True enough. 1st rule of effective communication - know your audience.I just had a chuckle at the thought of political ideology aimed at women (feminism) going to lengths to have emotion take precedence over reason. They know their target demographic.
i doubt its a conspiracy.
they probably sought to attach themselves to some perceived political/social movement, and missed the mark. none of which is unusual.
Women buy more shit, and more expensive shit in general. That drives prices up. Men will just buy whatever the least expensive thing is, driving prices down.
Now let's talk about car insurance, where men have to pay like an extra $1K a year more.
It’s got nothing to with buying more or more expensive shit, it’s that man give less of a shit about brands and are more price sensitive ergo carving back more of the producer surplus into consumer surplus.
Whats funny, is that if you made all these women's brands bargain bin shit, they'd be turned off and go for the more expensive stuff.
It's not about tax, ladies. It's about taste.
My girl started using my razors and shaving cream and said they both work and feel better. Problem solved.
Perfume vs calogne, I am not even sure if I can even spell the word, I am def not paying high end perfume prices for it.
I don’t take it as liberals gone made or anything like this. They were trying for some political jig that would cross over well to their products that would be generally inoffensive. NN fit that well, this was a big swing and miss.