Bodybuilding Kangaroo vs Python

I'm aware it's a wallaby but I've always loves this picture.
 
Holy shit is that a snake murdering a hippopotemus
 
ehtheist said:
Not by Anaconda choke...
Click to expand...

Royce-Gracie-vs-Art-Jimmerson.jpg


Gracie already defeated Jimmerson at UFC 1. I am going with the python via sub.
 
Zookeeper Gabe said:
Click to expand...

Pookepper Geb
why are you posting pic of a hippopotamus AKA a non-marsupial, for it is susceptible to snake poisions overdose (SPO). The bodybuilding kangaroo has natural defense against snake poisons (I have links to support this).
 
The One True said:
at first glance the answer seems obvious - kangaroo. he would certainly be the betting favorite no doubt. but let's not be so quick to dismiss the python

right off the bat, you can never count out poisons. everybody knows pythons have some of the most lethal poisons in the snake kingdom. that's mama nature's version of the 'puncher's chance' - one lucky bite and it's all over, the kangaroo will die from supreme poisons overdose (SPO). but that isn't the python's only means to a W in this bout. python has a very low center of gravity and is a difficult target to hit clean, kangaroo's best weapon (drop kicks) are simply useless in this bout. stomps are an option but not nearly as powerful as its missile toe drop kick. the kangaroo's boxing would also be nullified because he'd have to basically punch the ground, any boxer worth his salt knows you never punch downward, lose all your power that way

the more i think about it, the more i think the python really surprises people in this one. i see it wrapping around a leg and cutting off circulation. meanwhile the kangaroo is clawing at it but the python's skin is no joke, made of tuff stuff. python then goes for a lethal bite and from that point on its countdown to death by supreme poisons overdose (SPO)
Click to expand...

Pythons are nonvenomous constrictors just like Boa's. I thought everybody knew this.


Anyway, the Python is being counted out here. Their teeth are curved inward like hooks, so if a Python bites, it's hard to get it off unless you are willing to pull it's mouth away from your body, which would only cause it to tear a good piece out of you and be extremely painful. Once they bite, they are basically locked onto you. If the kangaroo had some rubbing alcohol then it would easily get the snake off, too bad kangaroos don't know how to use that, though. Sticking your hand in the Pythons mouth to get it off won't work, either, it will just bite again.

The Kangaroo can definitely tear the Python's mouth away from their body, they are very, very powerful, but as soon as a Python strikes, it immediately wraps around part of you and once they do that, it's incredibly hard to get them off of you. Once they wrap around you, it's like they're literally stuck to you and it doesn't really matter how strong you are. These snakes are capable of taking down very large prey with their ability to strike very quickly and wrap around you very quickly. It's like once a submission is locked in perfectly, your muscles no longer help you because it's overextended and the only thing left to rely on is bone and it's only a matter of time before it's broken. Pythons have taken tons of large prey, larger, stronger and far more dangerous than kangaroos and they have taken out many kangaroos very, very easily in the wild.



Burmese Python's are capable of reaching a max of 23 feet, making it one of the largest species of snake in the world. So, the people talking about the Kangaroo simply ripping it in half, yeah, I don't think so. That Python would strike quick and wrap around the Kangaroo in seconds and squeeze him to death. It would would squeeze the Kangaroo and make him like toothpaste. Python's are very strong animals.

Pythons have already killed kangaroos, I don't know about the other way around, though. You can actually go look up videos on YouTube of a python crushing and swallowing a kangaroo. There has been quite a few cases of pythons killing kangaroos very easily in Australia.

Go do some research on it, guys. Kangaroos are bad ass but the python wins almost every time. The kangaroo doesn't know how to stop a full grown python from striking so quickly and coiling around its body and crushing him to death.

Look it up. There are videos all over the internet and first hand accounts from witnesses who have seen pythons take out kangaroos like they were easy prey.

Pythons win this. Go do some research, kids.
 
Last edited:
Kangaroo is on PED's of this I have no doubt. he still yoked then a mutha doe..i'm jelly.
 
The One True said:
i'm sorry but you're way off base here. where do i begin. first off kangaroos aren't marsupials, they're mammals.
Click to expand...

Marsupials are an infraclass of mammals, the Kangaroo is in fact a marsupial. Marsupials are a group of mammals commonly known as pouched mammals. C'mon, man.
 
That209 said:
Pythons are nonvenomous constrictors just like Boa's. I thought everybody knew this.

Pythons win this. Go do some research, kids.
Click to expand...

this is simply incorrect. using the socratic method of logic:

all pythons are snakes

all snakes are poisons

therefore, all pythons are poisons

and who are you calling 'kid'? i was the first itt to propose the python defeating the kangaroo and explained how in great detail, you waddle in here 10 hours after the fact and parrot my ideas and claim them as your own. that is simply unacceptable

That209 said:
Marsupials are an infraclass of mammals, the Kangaroo is in fact a marsupial. Marsupials are a group of mammals commonly known as pouched mammals. C'mon, man.
Click to expand...

any links to support this? LMAO you can't categorize a group of mammals just because they have a pouch, that is a trivial characteristic at best. a marsupial is just a relatively small mammal
 
put down your purse betch, you'll get strangled
 
The One True said:
this is simply incorrect. using the socratic method of logic:

all pythons are snakes

all snakes are poisons

therefore, all pythons are poisons

and who are you calling 'kid'? i was the first itt to propose the python defeating the kangaroo and explained how in great detail, you waddle in here 10 hours after the fact and parrot my ideas and claim them as your own. that is simply unacceptable



any links to support this? LMAO you can't categorize a group of mammals just because they have a pouch, that is a trivial characteristic at best. a marsupial is just a relatively small mammal
Click to expand...

You think all snakes are poisonous? OK, now I know you're trolling. Pythons are not poisonous. They are nonvenomous constrictors. Go look it up ANYWHERE on the internet, go to Google, go watch a documentary on YouTube, they are nonvenomous constrictors just like Boas and Anacondas.

Wikipedia - Reptilegardens (both with exact same definition of Pythons)

"However, many harmless-to-humans snakes, like Hognose snakes, Garter snakes and Rat snakes for example, do produce toxins that are scientifically or technically venomous. Boas, pythons, bullsnakes and kingsnakes are examples of truly non-venomous snake species."


National Geographic

"They kill by constriction, grasping a victim with their sharp teeth, coiling their bodies around the animal, and squeezing until it suffocates. They have stretchy ligaments in their jaws that allow them to swallow all their food whole."
Click to expand...

Pythons are not venomous. That doesn't mean you can't get infections after being bitten, though, as their teeth/mouths can be loaded with bacteria but so can any animal in the world. Great white sharks have bitten people and given them infections due to bacteria in their mouths - but are they venomous, too? Is there something you know that nobody else in the world knows? I hope you can let us know, genius!



Also, the part about Marsupials, you can go look that up, too.

Wikipedia:

"Marsupials are an infraclass of mammals living primarily in Australasia and the Americas. A distinctive characteristic, common to most species, is that the young are carried in a pouch. Well-known marsupials include kangaroos, wallabies, the koala, possums, opossums, wombats and the Tasmanian devil."




UCMP (University of California Museum of Paleontology)

"In Australia, though, marsupials continue to be very diverse, and are the dominant native mammals. They include kangaroos, koalas (above left), tasmanian devils, wombats (above right), and other typical Australian mammals. Until recently, they also included the marsupial wolf, Thylacinus (below)."
Click to expand...

There's two little sources for you. So, are you going to dispute facts from the UCMP, a fucking university for paleontology?

These are the facts.


Go do some research, kid.

Too easy.

:icon_lol:
 
Last edited:
we live in the year 2015 and you're still using wiki as a reference LMAO? no reputable publisher would give your balderdash 'work' the time of day, you might be able to get away with lazy research like that in everest college but not against learned scientists such as myself (mastered in bio). wiki can be edited by anyone

you're dismissed
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

TheMMAnalyst
Umar vs. Merab Round 5 Re-Watch (Scoring Breakdown/Summary/Analysis)
2 3 4
Replies
78
Views
2K
maximus__
maximus__

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,771
Messages
58,316,910
Members
175,999
Latest member
Rosabelot

Share this page

Back
Top