Movies BLADE RUNNER 2049 Thread v.2

If you have seen BLADE RUNNER 2049, how would you rate it?


  • Total voters
    216
To my knowledge the title has never actually been explained. But I've always taken it to mean running on the edge of a blade.

Maybe because the job is full of peril and the smallest mistake can mean death?
Yes, it makes sense, and that's the official translation (in Russian these 2 meanings are said with different words), what led me to this question is 1) that i found info that in english blade runner means butcher first and foremost, but couldn't find proof and 2) russian movie title translation sucks ass.
Thank you for your input!
 
Is this an attempt to leave it up to the audience or setup another sequel?

Lol, first human to impregnate a robot

Well the question of "is he or isn't he?" has been around since the original film.

In PKD's original story Deckard was a human. Ford has said that he's human. Ridley Scott has said that he's a replicant. The original writer of the screenplay (who also returned to write 2049) prefers that it remain ambiguous.
 
Is deckard the only and first replicant to age and reproduce?

How was he able to reproduce?
Wallace's theory is that he built Deckard and Rachel specifically for each other to reproduce. He even supposes that Deckard was summoned to Tyrell Corp to meet Rachel on purpose. Might have been a subliminal thing build into their code. But, like @Secret Agent suggests, its not crystal clear that Deckard is supposed to be a Replicant as Scott suggested.
 
As of now, id like to think that they can, they just never tried due too many reasons.

Why was wallace so obsessed with obtaining Ana?

Did he want to dissect her since she was the only know result of a reproduced replicant?
Oh, they can reproduce; I just meant it's unclear how. What I can say is that Wallace is desperate and knows far less than he pretends. He thinks Tyrell designed Rachael to be reproductive, but if that were the case Coco would not have mentioned the difficulty of childbirth, not the least of which her pelvis being too narrow and the necessity of Sapper Morton's field medic experiences. He wants Ana because it continues to elude him, and he's a real asshole about it.


Btw, guys, maybe you can help me as native English speakers. There is a question I yet failed to answer.
"Blade runner" - does it mean someone running on a blade's edge, or rather someone running the blade through, say, someone's ribs? Or both?
I forget who came up with the term. I want to say Hampton Fancher created it because it sounds cool, because of your former reason. But then they discovered the term was already the title of a story, and so bought the rights so they can use the name in a totally unrelated manner. In the story it's about smuggling medical supplies. It might be that Ridley saw the title, or someone told him about it, and liked the sound of it. Think of it like, "Running the fine line between good/evil or human/replicant, etc."

There's a book called FUTURE NOIR that gets into everything about BLADE RUNNER.
 
Well when it's all said and done they're still machines. How could such a thing happen with a machine?

That's what I thought too.. But no, they aren't really machines. They are created humans. They use dna.
 
That's what I thought too.. But no, they aren't really machines. They are created humans. They use dna.
I liked how they were growing spare parts in the original film. A chinese guy growing eyes in something that looks like a wokker fridge room, how cool can that be?
 
He wasn't used to keep Ana's memories. She implanted fragments of her own memories into innumerable replicants, all of whom to some degree imagine themselves as special because of the realness of those memories. Effectively, Ana is the mother of the new replicants generation, imbuing them with an ego not tied to fear (a la Wallace) but another of her emotionally provocative memories. She has felt all those things, and by her so do they.
This is one of the reasons I have to watch it again. I was under the impression that K only thought he was special once he found the horse and "realized" he was the one. For the rest, I just felt they had first hand knowledge of the birth and that was handed down to one upgrade after the next creating a religion around the event?
 
I liked how they were growing spare parts in the original film. A chinese guy growing eyes in something that looks like a wokker fridge room, how cool can that be?
Would still smell like Chinese grocery. Either you know, or you don't.
 
Most visually stunning film of all-time (IMO).

So deeply entrenched in Film Noir. Some screenshots I took:

BR01.png

BR02.png

BR03.png

BR04.png

BR05.png

BR06.png

BR07.png

BR08.png

BR09.png

BR10.png

BR11.png

BR12.png

BR13.png

BR14.png

BR15.png

BR16.png

BR17.png

BR18.png

BR19.png

BR20.png

Looks amazing.

You going to be watching the Final Cut? It's pretty much my favorite film ever as it combines my two favorite genres (Sci-Fi and Noir) in a way that had never been remotely attempted before and hasn't been matched since. I think some people are thrown off by how deeply Noir it actually is.

Deckard fills the role of the flawed anti-hero and serves the narrative as both a detective and gun for hire. He's hardened, cynical, and by the time we find him, world-weary and alienated in a crumbling society and environment. During his investigation, he carries out orders the implications of which could be deemed morally questionable, but in a blade-sharp pivot, it turns out it isn't only the criminals he's searching for but rather himself: for his own humanity and identity.

Rachel is introduced as the mysterious, insolent, cigarette-smoking femme fatale right down to the 1940s style up-do, coloured arm bands and shoulder pads. However, like Deckard she undergoes a metamorphosis that adds a layer of depth, distinguishes and elevates her from stereotypical trappings and comes to form a complete and credible character. She is a fusion of two separate archetypes.

Genetic bioengineering serves the base of the plot, many of the major players are A.I. 'replicant' humanoids; the central theme explores the boundaries of humanity and the primary question posed - "What does it mean to be human?" - is examined repeatedly throughout, in a multitude of ways from varying angles (anxiety, memories, fear, choice, consciousness).

Yet still, it expands and lends itself to convey and highlight a range of large scale issues that include but aren't limited to: globalization, totalitarianism, environmental degradation, scientific and technological advancement. The setting presents a retrofitted dystopian future, a gloomy urban sprawl of high-tech ingenuity and possibility that's been soured by apparent ecological and societal devastation.

Visually, there's near perpetual night, darkness, and rain-soaked streets; smog and steam permeate the atmosphere at seemingly every twist and turn with neon advertisements flashing down from up above the city and reflecting off the steel, glass and damp asphalt. The stark contrast, unconventional angles, shadowy figures, smoke filled rooms, lamp lighting and even the damn venetian blinds are all prominently featured. Two of the most evident characteristics visually are the strong backlighting and utilization of light shafts.
 
♫♪Because that's what he told you.♫♪

blade-runner-2049-robin-wright-sylvia-hoeks-600x419.jpg


This is one of the reasons I have to watch it again. I was under the impression that K only thought he was special once he found the horse and "realized" he was the one. For the rest, I just felt they had first hand knowledge of the birth and that was handed down to one upgrade after the next creating a religion around the event?
I think we're saying pretty much the same thing.

I think I'm just more literal with the memory-is-evolution angle.
 
Last edited:
So, I haven't been following the thread, but...

Am I the only one that found Harrison Ford punching Ryan Gosling 10 times brought back memories of Roddy Piper vs Keith David in They Live?
 
Shit they don't have it...but its coming soon....I guess Imax @ 2d? or should I just go 3d? or just watch at some random crap movie theater?

Watch it iMax, its a Hans zimmer score, so sound is very important

But you sure no theaters in your county or next county have dolby cinema? That's odd
 
Watch it iMax

But you sure no theaters in your county or next county have dolby cinema? That's odd
San Francisco does but thats too far.


I wanted somewhere around Oakland or Berkeley to have it.
 
You going to be watching the Final Cut? It's pretty much my favorite film ever as it combines my two favorite genres (Sci-Fi and Noir) in a way that had never been remotely attempted before and hasn't been matched since. I think some people are thrown off by how deeply Noir it actually is.

Deckard fills the role of the flawed anti-hero and serves the narrative as both a detective and gun for hire. He's hardened, cynical, and by the time we find him, world-weary and alienated in a crumbling society and environment. During his investigation, he carries out orders the implications of which could be deemed morally questionable, but in a blade-sharp pivot, it turns out it isn't only the criminals he's searching for but rather himself: for his own humanity and identity.

Rachel is introduced as the mysterious, insolent, cigarette-smoking femme fatale right down to the 1940s style up-do, coloured arm bands and shoulder pads. However, like Deckard she undergoes a metamorphosis that adds a layer of depth, distinguishes and elevates her from stereotypical trappings and comes to form a complete and credible character. She is a fusion of two separate archetypes.

Genetic bioengineering serves the base of the plot, many of the major players are A.I. 'replicant' humanoids; the central theme explores the boundaries of humanity and the primary question posed - "What does it mean to be human?" - is examined repeatedly throughout, in a multitude of ways from varying angles (anxiety, memories, fear, choice, consciousness).

Yet still, it expands and lends itself to convey and highlight a range of large scale issues that include but aren't limited to: globalization, totalitarianism, environmental degradation, scientific and technological advancement. The setting presents a retrofitted dystopian future, a gloomy urban sprawl of high-tech ingenuity and possibility that's been soured by apparent ecological and societal devastation.

Visually, there's near perpetual night, darkness, and rain-soaked streets; smog and steam permeate the atmosphere at seemingly every twist and turn with neon advertisements flashing down from up above the city and reflecting off the steel, glass and damp asphalt. The stark contrast, unconventional angles, shadowy figures, smoke filled rooms, lamp lighting and even the damn venetian blinds are all prominently featured. Two of the most evident characteristics visually are the strong backlighting and utilization of light shafts.

Yep, Final Cut hopefully.
 
Luckily work is sending my ass to Copenhagen next week and I think they have Imax there (none in Lithuania) so I am going to watch it a second time.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top