Mate, why the aggression? I haven't bothered to search pubmed, but you are contradicting yourself. If it is described across sports psychiatry it for sure should be published and Linked through relevant search engines.
I never heard the term sport psychiatryst to be honest, only sport psychologist. Honestly, i am "skeptic" the term exists, because i guess sport psychologists are for things as motivational adjustment and Performance enhancing, psychiatry is medical treatment of mental ilness and generaly doesn't differentiate between professions of the field. Would be pretty cute now that i think about it to label a psychiatrist or a psychotherapist after the selective treatment of the work description of their selective patient group.
Don't sweat, it's all light hearted fun, you don't have to be offended. Take it easy, it really helps. Maybe there are "Sport psychiatrists" as i guess for high Performance athletes there is more money involved and therefore incentive for practitioners to specialice. I just don't think it's a field but a few selected persons if there is such.
There are so many indicators in your two posts i replied to, that without possible knowing for certain i am lead to assume you are not really familiar with the field you are talking about... just to pick one: adjustment disorder is one of the most low-threshold diagnosis to be found in the field. I know that some General practicioners treat it more as an causal indicator (at least i hope so, otherwise they have even less of a clue what they are doing) but it really isn't. Anything grave, not even talking about bj penn, would be better descriped with a more specific and higher-threshold diagnosis.
For further reading try f43.2 (icd-10).
I haven't tried to "debunk" it, even if following your line of reason it should be pretty easy, since a claim without evidence can be discarded without further investigation (regarding your "they describe it [behind close doors i guess], they just don't publish it" line of reasoning and general "it is so because i say so"
without any insights or linked publication" attitude). I was a little bit curious and a little bit skeptic.
Since your reply was of no value for my curiosity (and your tone leads to no hope further exchange would change that) and i have just learned from you that i am not really skeptic but just pretending to be, this is the end of our short conversation. Fun while it lasted. wish you all the best. Don't be offended so easily.