• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

Law Ben Shapiro and Elon Musk plea for Derek Chauvin to get pardoned

What is it about people like you completely making shit up? He was not caught on video swallowing any stash.

There was bodycam of him saying something about drugs. And this came out during the trial. There was disagreement about what exactly was said because it wasn't clear from the video.

“I believe Mr. Floyd was saying, ‘I ain’t do no drugs,’” replied Senior Special Agent James Reyerson.

“Does it sound like he says, ‘I ate too many drugs?’” Nelson asked.

“I can’t make that out,” Stiger replied.

You see the documentatry :The Greatest Lie Ever Told ?? This stuff has been verified. In a PRIOR incident he was caught with a stash in his mouth. His autopsy showed he had a shit load of drugs in his system with he died also. I was on the "keep Chauvin in jail for good measure" train as well before I saw this documentary.
 
Last edited:
I hate to be this guy but it definetely goes both ways. The left goes over the top to draw conclusions before information is all out there. The whole Penny case was turned into a stupid culture war phenomenon by the left and then it gave the right the opportunity to turn him into a hero.
Yes, it can go both ways but one side is definitely way more guilty of it than the other. There is no equivalency here.

And it’s beside the point anyway. One side is cheering on a bunch of billionaires looting taxpayer money. The other side is just being worthless, nutless pieces of shit.
 
You see the documentatry :The Greatest Lie Ever Told ?? This stuff has been verified. In a PRIOR incident he was caught with a stash in his mouth. His autopsy showed he had a shit load of drugs in his system with he died also. I was on the "keep Chauvin in jail for good measure" train as well before I saw this documentary.

I don't give a shit about some bullshit documentary. I trust actual testimony in court.

A PRIOR incident is completely irrelevant. Because we're trying to determine what killed him in THAT incident.

And we know for a fact what did - Chauvin compressing his neck. Two separate autopsies showed that. As well as the video that we ALL SAW with our own eyes.
 
I don't give a shit about some bullshit documentary. I trust actual testimony in court.
OH yeah they covered that also.
A PRIOR incident is completely irrelevant. Because we're trying to determine what killed him in THAT incident.
Proves it wasn't out of the realm of possibility. Which is why they tried to block the past incident from coming to light. Which would help explain with all that shit was in his system.
And we know for a fact what did - Chauvin compressing his neck. Two separate autopsies showed that. As well as the video that we ALL SAW with our own eyes.
It was more his upper back/shoulder. I saw it also. Which would help explain with all that shit was in his system.
 
OH yeah they covered that also.

Proves it wasn't out of the realm of possibility. Which is why they tried to block the past incident from coming to light. Which would help explain with all that shit was in his system.

Why the hell would a prior incident have anything to do with this incident? The judge blocked it because it has nothing to do with Chauvin's guilt in this incident. This is common in criminal cases.
 
Someone who doesnt realize or recognize the systemic issues that are entrenched in law enforcement. This includes policy, procedure, practices, training, and hiring.

A bootlicker is ignorant to police practices/structure that should be abolished due to abuse such as civil asset forfeiture, carding, qualified immunity.

Police union is too powerful to hold bad cops accountable. There is a huge lack of transparency and accountability, due to police investigating themselves.
I kinda figured the definition for "bootlicker" would contain exaggerations and outright falsehoods. There's a reason nobody else ever answers me on that.

I can go on and on. I'll just leave it at ACAB and you're welcome to disagree. We agree to disagree
To live in a country and enjoy the freedoms and possibilities, but deny you have any accountability, is the height of entitlement. For a society to function, you must have laws and there must be law enforcement. Nobody doubts there have been abuses and they deserve to be rooted out. It's a myth that only cops investigate other cops and there's never transparency or accountability. There's a million examples of police being held accountable for their actions.

So, to say ACAB is to admit you have a selfish cowards mindset and you have never actually looked into fact based statistics on law enforcement. You enjoy the general peace and security law enforcement provides where you live, but you choose not to appreciate it. That's sad.
 
LOL Even Trump isn't low enough to go along with this bullshit.

Now that he's said that he's not into it, I'm assuming that the pro-Chauvin deadenders will move onto something else.

Similar to how none of the rightoids are willing to be vocal about H-1Bs anymore after daddy Trump said that he supports them.



 
I kinda figured the definition for "bootlicker" would contain exaggerations and outright falsehoods. There's a reason nobody else ever answers me on that.


To live in a country and enjoy the freedoms and possibilities, but deny you have any accountability, is the height of entitlement. For a society to function, you must have laws and there must be law enforcement. Nobody doubts there have been abuses and they deserve to be rooted out. It's a myth that only cops investigate other cops and there's never transparency or accountability. There's a million examples of police being held accountable for their actions.

So, to say ACAB is to admit you have a selfish cowards mindset and you have never actually looked into fact based statistics on law enforcement. You enjoy the general peace and security law enforcement provides where you live, but you choose not to appreciate it. That's sad.

PDs are purely reactive entities. There also several SCOTUS decisions clearly stating that they have no constitutional duty to protect the general public.

But hey, whatever helps you sleep at night.
 
Saw a headline on MSN earlier "Trump breaks his silence on a Derek Chauvin pardon" and I thought "oh shit, here we go".

He broke his silence by saying "I haven't seen anything about it."

Such riveting journalism.
 
Back
Top