International BBC caught instructing anti-Israel bias on it's Gaza coverage

No. They aren't

BBCs "guidelines" are incredibly partial and biased. And thats the point

Which one of their guidelines is biased, aka not reflective of the reality on the ground in Gaza?

Their main points:

-GHF has failed: Yes, nearly every aid agency has stated this and they haven't even provided a meal a day for each Gazan, while killing hundreds, if not thousands.
-Accept Hamas Ministry of Health casualty figures: They publisah thtem, alongside Israeli claims and counterclaims. There aren't bettter sources to use because Israel has banned indepedent Western journalists from entering Gaza.
-Israel is the occupying power: Yup, idk how you can argue Israel isn't currently occupying Gaza.
-Aid has been too little too late: Yup again, most everyone not Israel has stated this at this point.
You arent British. Though I guess you would love to be.
Nope, I'm proud to be American and live in a country united by common creeds over anything else.
 
Nope, I'm proud to be American and live in a country united by common creeds over anything else.
Which begs the question

Why are you talking with such certainty and in such an obnoxious way about a foreign state broadcaster which you know nothing about except what you Google about historically.

Oh wait. Because you are an obnoxious American and lack the self reflection to understand that being obnoxiously far left in the US is the exact counterpoint to being obnoxiously far right in the US and perhaps don't bring your own obnoxious extreme politics left or right to the rest of the world.

But no, you'll never do that

Because you are a "Canadian trumpet"
 
There aren't two sides here. Israel is committing a genocide in front of our eyes. If anything media outlets have bent over backwards to hide that fact. Fuck Netanyahu and his entire government. He's a monster as evil as the Hamas terrorists he claims to still be fighting against. They all deserve to be tried for war crimes when this ends.
 
Which begs the question

Why are you talking with such certainty and in such an obnoxious way about a foreign state broadcaster which you know nothing about except what you Google about historically.

Oh wait. Because you are an obnoxious American and lack the self reflection to understand that being obnoxiously far left in the US is the exact counterpoint to being obnoxiously far right in the US and perhaps don't bring your own obnoxious extreme politics left or right to the rest of the world.

But no, you'll never do that

Because you are a "Canadian trumpet"
My views on the current near-famine are based on reports from the experts who study food insecurities and the chorus of aid groups highlighting the plight of starving Gazans.

That's why I'm confident in this sttatement: Israel is purposefully starving Gazan civilians and attempting to deflect and cover up what would be an attempt at genocide.

Hint: I'm not a leftist with foreign policy, unless you think Mearsheimer is a far lefty.
 
I'm sure you think you have a point here with your bizarre false equivalence IREEKOFBULLSHIT.

No you have no point. I pointed towards bbc whistleblowers, who have not been sued, saying they are receiving guidance from the Israel embassy on what they should and should not say.

YOU then tell me, who posted that sitting in the UK “you fucking idiot what do you know about the UK” and posted nothing else.

Ad hominem

I politely asked you what I got wrong, didn’t say ad hominem, didn’t say hey billy what the fuck do you know, shouldn’t you go back to smashing stain glass windows?, just “what I got wrong ?”

You then made a vague stament about a “report” where the bbc were found 1500 times to have breached their own guidelines in favour of Israels and your enemies, thinking you could say it and imply it was a legitimate neutral report because I wouldn’t know what you were talking about. I did know what “report” you were talking about and you said….

Ad hominem

Nothing else

You could have used the documentary where they used the Hamas guys daughter in the commentary but you didn’t. I would have had to concede on that. But you didn’t. I can probably give you more legitimate cases of the BBC being caught out breaching their guidelines against their masters Israel then you!!!

That’s because you seem to be a mug. So given how you have carried yourself in the brief interaction despite me being perfectly polite. I will now politely ask shouldn’t you be off smashing stain glass windows and signing up at the Israeli consulate? You’d probably fucking make a mess of that too though!

I wish you the best though. No doubt there are other things where me and you could share a drink and agree with each other. Have a great weekend billy.
 
Only the right leaning ones. The left leaning ones are slanted in the opposite direction of Israel. You have to be an idiot to think any of them are objective either way.
The NYT is right leaning?
 

If you're not familiar with Kevin Vuong, he has a pretty wild story.

He ran as a liberal member of parliament, and was a shoe-in to win. However, a few days before the election, it was "revealed" that years prior, he had been charged with sexual assault, and the charges were dropped 7 months later. A literal nothingburger.

Apparently, the fact that he had been charged with a criminal offence was an enough of an affront that the Liberals removed him from their party a day before the election, with Justin Trudeau being personally involved in the decision.

Unfortunately for the Liberals, mail in ballots exist. Vuong ended up winning the riding because a ton of people had already cast their vote for him by mail-in ballot.

After the election the Liberal party (and liberal media) demanded he "do the right thing" and voluntarily step down, despite the fact that his win was completely legitimate. Vuong kindly told the Liberal party to go fuck themselves, and he kept his seat as an independent.


 
Last edited:
Back
Top