Media Aspinall's suspect cardio: Gane has to survive the first round basically

[Poirierfan]

Mumbo jumbo.

 

[Luthien]

jumbo

Speaking of Jumbo! Look at what @HI SCOTT NEWMAN ate yesterday, that whole thing went down

 

[AndrewGolota48]

And as we know, commentators are on the mark 100% of the time

I love how several members of the Aspinall cult have created a conspiracy theory that the announcer shouldn't believe his own eyes and ears, very Orwellian.

And yet at the same time they believe that Tom is 11% bodyfat. Truly sick demented individuals.

 

[mkess101]

I love how several members of the Aspinall cult have created a conspiracy theory that the announcer shouldn't believe his own eyes and ears, very Orwellian.

And yet at the same time they believe that Tom is 11% bodyfat. Truly sick demented individuals.

No you absolute drooling idiot, nobody is saying the announcer was LYING, just mistaken as to what was happening. Like (as has been pointed out now numerous times) when they talk about a fight being over and then they're wrong and it continues (just one example). How dumb are you exactly that you conflate an announcer being mistaken with any sort of conspiracy? Even for you, this is laughable. And that's saying something.

And no Aspinall isn't 11% bodyfat so it's not the same people. You're just an utter moron with an axe to grind. Why? Who knows, but it makes you continuously bring the stupid, that's for sure.

 

[Mmmmmmma1234]

You really think it will be that easy though? Do you think Gane would get ragdolled by a 40 year old Kongo the way Volkov did? I know Gane isn't exactly Brock or Cain but he's not that easy to manhandle. His grappling in the Volkov fight only looked bad because his feet were fucked up, he had no issues shutting down Spivac in the fight right before that.

Oh did Gane TDD look amazing vs Spivac who literally tried ONE takedown all fight.

What a sad point.

 

[AndrewGolota48]

Oh did Gane TDD look amazing vs Spivac who literally tried ONE takedown all fight.

What a sad point.

Why couldn't he get his wrestling going Clown Boy? You think Spivac just wanted to stand and bang the whole fight to prove a point? It's so weird for me being high IQ on Sherdog, feels like The Twilight Zone.

 

[AndrewGolota48]

No you absolute drooling idiot, nobody is saying the announcer was LYING, just mistaken as to what was happening. Like (as has been pointed out now numerous times) when they talk about a fight being over and then they're wrong and it continues (just one example). How dumb are you exactly that you conflate an announcer being mistaken with any sort of conspiracy? Even for you, this is laughable. And that's saying something.

And no Aspinall isn't 11% bodyfat so it's not the same people. You're just an utter moron with an axe to grind. Why? Who knows, but it makes you continuously bring the stupid, that's for sure.

Ah so he was automatically wrong since announcers have been jumped the gun in other fights on predicting finishes to submissions? Or somehow this invalidates his observation of Aspinall being more gassed than Arlovski? And the authority on him being mistaken is because you and some other cult members disagree?

I presented evidence, that's the bottom line. Doesn't mean it's written in stone but it's evidence.

Khabib's leg was about to give out before he subbed Gaethje, and his cult fans were less likely to admit that than Khabib himself. Cult members like yourself would find it offensive to suggest that Khabib was in danger of losing, but I would see it as he made the right move at the right time based on the circumstances and got the win, intelligently.

In a very similar fashion Aspinall made the choice to go for that takedown and finish as the tide was turning, he was getting hit and fading faster than his opponent.

 

[mkess101]

Ah so he was automatically wrong since announcers have been jumped the gun in other fights on predicting finishes to submissions? Or somehow this invalidates his observation of Aspinall being more gassed than Arlovski? And the authority on him being mistaken is because you and some other cult members disagree?

I presented evidence, that's the bottom line. Doesn't mean it's written in stone but it's evidence.

Khabib's leg was about to give out before he subbed Gaethje, and his cult fans were less likely to admit that than Khabib himself. Cult members like yourself would find it offensive to suggest that Khabib was in danger of losing, but I would see it as he made the right move at the right time based on the circumstances and got the win, intelligently.

In a very similar fashion Aspinall made the choice to go for that takedown and finish as the tide was turning, he was getting hit and fading faster than his opponent.

The fact that you call others "cult members" while spamming the forum with one thread after another just to shit on one fighter is one of the funniest things ever. You understand you've made yourself a punchline to everyone with your obsession? It's just lost on you somehow.

And you should probably take a look at what the word "evidence" means. Someone making an observation that could be correct OR incorrect isn't "evidence" you buffoon. He doesn't need to be "automatically wrong" for what you're saying to NOT be evidence. One person making a claim based on what COULD be a flawed interpretation of what they're seeing isn't evidence. And moreso, the fact that the person they claimed was getting tired so easily shot and took down and subbed the other guy speaks to the commentary NOT being accurate. The fact that you're too stupid and/or dishonest to gauge that makes it no less true.

I'm baffled as to why you think posting more and more stupid shit and being laughed at appeals to you.

 

[mkess101]

Why couldn't he get his wrestling going Clown Boy? You think Spivac just wanted to stand and bang the whole fight to prove a point? It's so weird for me being high IQ on Sherdog, feels like The Twilight Zone.

High IQ LMFAO!!!

It's debatable as to whether you'd beat a potted plant in an IQ contest.

 

[AndrewGolota48]

The fact that you call others "cult members" while spamming the forum with one thread after another just to shit on one fighter is one of the funniest things ever. You understand you've made yourself a punchline to everyone with your obsession? It's just lost on you somehow.

And you should probably take a look at what the word "evidence" means. Someone making an observation that could be correct OR incorrect isn't "evidence" you buffoon. He doesn't need to be "automatically wrong" for what you're saying to NOT be evidence. One person making a claim based on what COULD be a flawed interpretation of what they're seeing isn't evidence. And moreso, the fact that the person they claimed was getting tired so easily shot and took down and subbed the other guy speaks to the commentary NOT being accurate. The fact that you're too stupid and/or dishonest to gauge that makes it no less true.

I'm baffled as to why you think posting more and more stupid shit and being laughed at appeals to you.

Of course it's evidence clown, you think the announcer should've measured Tom's lactic acid levels? And I already spoonfed you the Khabib analogy to help you along but I guess it's still not enough, your SAT score on that section must've been abysmal. Khabib's leg was fucked to hell by his own admission, yet he shot a beautiful explosive takedown and got the finish. One does not necessarily negate the other.

 

[mkess101]

Of course it's evidence clown, you think the announcer should've measured Tom's lactic acid levels? And I already spoonfed you the Khabib analogy to help you along but I guess it's still not enough, your SAT score on that section must've been abysmal. Khabib's leg was fucked to hell by his own admission, yet he shot a beautiful explosive takedown and got the finish. One does not necessarily negate the other.

There are inbred methheads that present more cogent arguments than you do. You're an embarrassment. Under no commonly accepted definition of the word "evidence" would a random utterance of an announcer (whom we see make incorrect statements essentially every fight) be accepted as "evidence". An analogy doesn't work when you're comparing something that by almost all accounts isnt true with something that might be true. Of course, you're not even close to being bright enough to grasp that.

So far, nothing outside of you (and any view you have of it is easily discarded given your bizarre obsession with trashing Aspinall) and one throw away comment by one person suggests Aspinall was gassed in that fight. Nothing.

What a weird person you must be to obsess so much over shit talking a fighter that you create thread after thread full of bullshit to try to "prove" the guy isn't good. You seem like the type to peep into people's windows. Creepy.

 

[Evbo]

I love how several members of the Aspinall cult have created a conspiracy theory that the announcer shouldn't believe his own eyes and ears, very Orwellian.

And yet at the same time they believe that Tom is 11% bodyfat. Truly sick demented individuals.

You’re living in a complete online fantasy land, so I’d take the lead from everyone else and not worry one whit about a single thing you're saying

 

[Alpha_T83]

I'm sure at some point if someone had enough cardio and could survive the early rounds without getting KO'd, that they could get Tom exhausted and in real trouble. But that's a lot of ifs. And I don't see Cyril Gane being that guy.

I think Gane has a puncher's chance here, with Aspinall being too fast and being a better wrestler having all the advantages.

 

[WoozyFailGuy]

And yet at the same time they believe that Tom is 11% bodyfat. Truly sick demented individuals.

That was my thread and most of it was us talking about how InScan results weren't good for accurately measuring body fat. He's closer to ~15%, not that it makes an actual difference.

 

[mkess101]

That was my thread and most of it was us talking about how InScan results weren't good for accurately measuring body fat. He's closer to ~15%, not that it makes an actual difference.

Yeah but if the idiot you're replying to isn't allowed to fabricate a strawman, what does he have left? You cannot expect him to "prove" how terrible Tom Aspinall is by being truthful for crying out loud!

 

[Captain Herb]

This is it. It’s reasonable to be skeptical. Fact is questions linger when a guy typically wins quickly. There is still plenty we haven’t seen from Aspinall, there’s nothing wrong with thinking maybe he’s not all that. Nothing wrong with speculating at potential weaknesses.

However, that is not what these posters are doing. They’re posting with a clear anti-Aspinall bias and an agenda. Clawing and digging for anything to downplay him. Clearly praying for him to fail and not being subtle about it. It’s clear ulterior motives, not just mere skepticism.

It's a pretty hollow victory for Jones and his fangirls to say "someone else beat the guy I ran away from. Ha ha."

 

[CatchtheseHands]

I'm sure Francis had an incredible grappling camp with his torn ACL/MCL too!

Okay, and? Let's not act as if Gane got destroyed on the ground by Francis with no knee's cause he didn't. Francis just was able to do enough to get the win and would have maybe lost if it wasn't for that stupid heel hook of Gane's.

 

[Portland8242]

Okay, and? Let's not act as if Gane got destroyed on the ground by Francis with no knee's cause he didn't. Francis just was able to do enough to get the win and would have maybe lost if it wasn't for that stupid heel hook of Gane's.

Wasn't a heel hook attempt, it was a scissor sweep from Francis. Go watch the tape back.

And yeah equally as humliatling that 1 legged Ngannou with probably no camp at all still did that to him. Gane embarrassed himself in a couple fights.

 

[AndrewGolota48]

There are inbred methheads that present more cogent arguments than you do. You're an embarrassment. Under no commonly accepted definition of the word "evidence" would a random utterance of an announcer (whom we see make incorrect statements essentially every fight) be accepted as "evidence". An analogy doesn't work when you're comparing something that by almost all accounts isnt true with something that might be true. Of course, you're not even close to being bright enough to grasp that.

So far, nothing outside of you (and any view you have of it is easily discarded given your bizarre obsession with trashing Aspinall) and one throw away comment by one person suggests Aspinall was gassed in that fight. Nothing.

What a weird person you must be to obsess so much over shit talking a fighter that you create thread after thread full of bullshit to try to "prove" the guy isn't good. You seem like the type to peep into people's windows. Creepy.

A lay witness can offer an opinion that a person "looked angry" or "seemed nervous," because such statements are considered "shorthand descriptions" of observed facts. Under the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE), a lay witness opinion is admissible as long as it is rationally based on their own perception and is helpful to the jury.

"Your honor, the overgrown English Nancy Boy looked gassed as fuck compared to the Belarusian guy twice his age. The defense rests.

- "Hi, I'm mkess101!"

 

[mkess101]

A lay witness can offer an opinion that a person "looked angry" or "seemed nervous," because such statements are considered "shorthand descriptions" of observed facts. Under the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE), a lay witness opinion is admissible as long as it is rationally based on their own perception and is helpful to the jury.

"Your honor, the overgrown English Nancy Boy looked gassed as fuck compared to the Belarusian guy twice his age. The defense rests.

- "Hi, I'm mkess101!"

Except that doesn't work when there are millions of others witnessing the same thing and almost none of them hold the same view as the one blabbing it because they feel the need to say something about the fight.

"Evidence" in the context of what we're talking about (a public sporting event with millions of viewers) vs in a court of law are far from the same thing.

Are you actually so stupid as to not understand this???

Again, it's like you have a crippling addiction to looking stupid.