@senri
Not according to the IAAF website. https://www.iaaf.org/athletes/jamaica/usain-bolt-184599
He ran sub 20s 3 yrs after starting in competitive track -- then it took another 4 yrs to run the WR. Is that ludicrous?
The scarier thing is his 100m progression;
yr 1: 10.03 (first year running the 100m!!)
yr 2: 9.69
We could argue what that means.
You claim he never had incentive to dope, which is BS. Bolt had stagnated (which the results in your link shows, btw) and wasn't good enough to win the biggest events in his sport. That's not reason enough to dope?
If he was doping he would have been caught like all other athletes did recently from WADA. Blood samples are kept for up to 8 years. Nobody was safe even superstars like Iliya ilin in weightlifting was caught despite govt backing.
That's BS. You have far too much faith in the corrupt pieces of shit running the IOC. Only a very small percentage of samples are retested and there's zero transparency in the selection process of who gets retested and what for. How many americans and western euros have been caught by IOC retesting of olympic samples? Do you really believe there's no doping in the west?
I find it hilarious that Lily King blasted Yulia Efimova for being a drug cheat, then proceeds to beat the drug cheater while she is on her high horse about how clean she is. The bitching only works if you went out and LOST to the big bad Russian cheater. The fact that you dominated the big bad drug cheater makes me feel like Lily King herself is on the best drugs.
@therealdope likes this post but claims to know guys who were clean & #1 in drug riddled sports and will defend Bolt who has outclassed every doper in history. Makes sense? Nope, not at all.