Andrew Tate arrested

lmfao yeah okay those women look super happy. especially the one that locked him out of the room. let’s say you’re not a moron and that’s true, what about situations where those women say “wtf you raped me” and he goes “yes i raped you and i loved it” and she goes to the cops and says “he raped me” right? or is that still roleplaying lol

Apparently Tate was investigated in 2015 for this case and the investigation was dropped and closed.
 
you're one of us contempt now....fuck the trannies, i respect you now. Better respect me too !!!

I am not someone who dwells in this crappy sub. I was just curious how the soy boys reacted to Tate being released and still with zero charges since December.

...about the same as I would have expected. Now I'm out.
 
I am not someone who dwells in this crappy sub. I was just curious how the soy boys reacted to Tate being released and still with zero charges since December.

...about the same as I would have expected. Now I'm out.
you're the colby covington of the forum.
 
Apparently Tate was investigated in 2015 for this case and the investigation was dropped and closed.
the UK police stated there was “doubt” in the case because she had consensual sex with him days later. this is a fundamental misunderstanding of rape trauma and how victims attempt to gain agency and perceived control after dealing with trauma. also doesn’t account for the fact that they were already having sex regularly before he raped her and she could just as easily be keeping up appearances out of fear. the UK is also among the world’s worst at even charging rapists with rape, often despite the rapist confessing.

https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/apr/19/uk-courts-rape-civil-prosecution-rates

ignoring all of that, i’m not trying to convince you andrew tate is a convicted rapist, that wouldn’t be true. he’s still a rapist, and an admitted one.
 
they need to lock this criminal scum back up just for not recycling his pizza boxes.
 
the UK police stated there was “doubt” in the case because she had consensual sex with him days later. this is a fundamental misunderstanding of rape trauma and how victims attempt to gain agency and perceived control after dealing with trauma. also doesn’t account for the fact that they were already having sex regularly before he raped her and she could just as easily be keeping up appearances out of fear. the UK is also among the world’s worst at even charging rapists with rape, often despite the rapist confessing.

https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/apr/19/uk-courts-rape-civil-prosecution-rates

ignoring all of that, i’m not trying to convince you andrew tate is a convicted rapist, that wouldn’t be true. he’s still a rapist, and an admitted one.

Hmm don't know about that. So she kept having sex with her alleged rapist after the fact?
 
wtf-gif.gif
i must live in a weird area
 
so you like children. sexually. dope.
Um, what? I never slept with anyone that young, but it is 100% legal where I live. I don't have an issue with it if it's legal. Not my problem I'm not gonna spend tax dollars on a 16 year old sleeping with her 21 year old boyfriend, literally don't give a single fuck. If you're over 30 it's a little strange but I know 17 year olds who sneak into bars dude. Bars. With fake IDs that swipe at the liquor store. No man should do time over that.
 
the UK police stated there was “doubt” in the case because she had consensual sex with him days later. this is a fundamental misunderstanding of rape trauma and how victims attempt to gain agency and perceived control after dealing with trauma. also doesn’t account for the fact that they were already having sex regularly before he raped her and she could just as easily be keeping up appearances out of fear. the UK is also among the world’s worst at even charging rapists with rape, often despite the rapist confessing.

https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/apr/19/uk-courts-rape-civil-prosecution-rates

ignoring all of that, i’m not trying to convince you andrew tate is a convicted rapist, that wouldn’t be true. he’s still a rapist, and an admitted one.
Its not a fundamental misunderstanding. Its an byproduct of having a system that requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

Police and prosecutors know defense cross examination will have a field day with it and that even trying to charge is a waste of taxpayers money.

its still the better option out of legal system alternatives I have seen proposed.
 
Yah not convinced as you apparently are 100%. I don't "believe all women." I believe evidence.
it is literally a fact. backed up by evidence.

https://www.rainn.org/statistics/perpetrators-sexual-violence

so 33% are straight up romantic partners and exes and 39% are acquaintances meaning anything from a coworker, a neighbor, to a tinder date. looks like “most” aren’t exes/romantic partners but that makes up the largest discernible group. less than 20% of rapes are committed by strangers.
 
it is literally a fact. backed up by evidence.

https://www.rainn.org/statistics/perpetrators-sexual-violence

so 33% are straight up romantic partners and exes and 39% are acquaintances meaning anything from a coworker, a neighbor, to a tinder date. looks like “most” aren’t exes/romantic partners but that makes up the largest discernible group. less than 20% of rapes are committed by strangers.


Yeah this is definitely true, stranger rapes are a minority but usually more horrific and sometimes involving more than just rape. But yeah it's definitely true, makes sense too - someone having close and comfortable access to a victim. The guy grabbing a woman on the street and dragging her into an alley is a minority compared to the guy living with her or being within her social circle or closer
 
it is literally a fact. backed up by evidence.

https://www.rainn.org/statistics/perpetrators-sexual-violence

so 33% are straight up romantic partners and exes and 39% are acquaintances meaning anything from a coworker, a neighbor, to a tinder date. looks like “most” aren’t exes/romantic partners but that makes up the largest discernible group. less than 20% of rapes are committed by strangers.

I'm talking about hard evidence that Tate raped some girl in 2015. Some murky audio is not enough evidence to convict someone of rape.
 
I'm talking about hard evidence that Tate raped some girl in 2015. Some murky audio is not enough evidence to convict someone of rape.
this isn’t a court of law, you goober. a girl accused him of rape and he admitted to it. the law has nothing to do with it. he’s a rapist.
 
One thing that's a bit weird about this, not sure if anyone has noticed is that when Tristan Tate gets to talk to reporters etc, he always says "He's innocent", not "WE'RE both innocent". I've never seen him say that they're innocent. If you see the footage of them being released, Andrew was just behind him but Tristan keeps saying he's innocent.

Not sure if this means something or a nothingburger. Either way, they should release the Tate brothers IF they're innocent.

What do you even mean by "if they are innocent?"

They haven't even been charged wirh a crime bro. How can they be guilty of a crime if there isn't even a crime charged to them?

Some of you guys belong back in the stone age
 
Back
Top