- Joined
- Aug 10, 2013
- Messages
- 26,142
- Reaction score
- 15,143
Exactly my point. When are scientists ever 100% correct about anything? Most of the time the scientific community looks the other way though as long as it conforms to the orthodoxy they've established. If it falls outside of the rejected norms, the assailant becomes ostracized and turned into a pariah.
The late Dr Velikovsky was not an astronomer, astrophysicist, or geologist though, he was actually a psychoanalyst, but because he was willing to step outside the boundaries put in place by the academics of his time he was able to uncover some very compelling evidence for things that have happened here on earth which are quite anomalous.
There is no substitute for the role played by people like him. I am totally with you on that. This happens today quite often as well, Graham Hancock is probably going to end up being vindicated in his theories on the antiquity of civilization, and he had to go through a hellish bombardment by orthodox academia back in the 90's when he released Fingerprints.
Last edited: