- Joined
- Jul 23, 2011
- Messages
- 34,962
- Reaction score
- 26,210
Fair enough.
Once you take away the mystery of how it was built, it kind of loses it's wow factor.
Fair enough.
Once you take away the mystery of how it was built, it kind of loses it's wow factor.
pyramids mark geodetic power spots around the planet for refueling alien spaceships as was illustrated in ancient astronauts series
en sabah nur built the pyramids. i saw it @ the end of xmen so it must b true
Wow dude, I hadn't even thought of that but you're absolutely right. And wouldn't that fit in with the interior ramp theory? Holy crap, maybe THAT'S how they built it! Did we just solve how they built the freaking pyramids?![]()
Egypt really pisses me off. They need to dig under the sphinx not destroy it by fixing it up. Find the labyrinth that I believe Homer spoke of.
that whole plateau supposedly has miles and miles of underground tunnels, rooms etc...whenever something is found they just put gates up to prevent people from going in. I get it's about safety but at least professionals should be allowed to go down there and record what they find.
The authorities in Egypt have been more about preserving what is there than learning about what is there and discovery for the past 50 years.When it comes to learning the secrets of the ancients I can't believe they just block it off and take so long. I thought it was pretty much the goal of man to learn of our past. If I had any say I'd say hey, build\buy ten less missles and take that money to fund highly professional teams to dig non stop around the plataue non stop.
Great, now we know that on some level the Dynastic Egyptians could move a large rock across sand. Pyramid building problem solved.
That idea speaks in no way to how they would have cut, quarried, moved and placed 2.3 million blocks of stone weighing 6 million tons over a 14 acre footprint all the while aligning it to within 3/60ths of a degree true north...with intricate chambers and shafts that deviate less than an inch over hundreds of feet.
You should also be clear on the fact that not all the pyramids are built the same...most of them are basically rubble piles at this point. If I had to take a wild guess, those are probably copies by people who found the stuff at Giza, tried to copy it and had none of the skills to properly do it.
for perspective, Apple would go bankrupt trying to build the great pyramid to it's actual specs. Just for some perspective.
I doubt we could do much better with 2015 surveying technology let alone whatever the hell these folks had. What did they reference to even think of setting up this geometry and positioning? It would honestly be an incredible feat for todays technology.
Ive read an estimate that the pyramid would cost like 5 billion to construct with modern methods.
By the way, you have been talking about the "orthodox" way to explain the pyramid construction, but looking at the main stream information source, i.e. wikipedia, there really isnt one generally accepted hypothesis regarding how they managed to build the top part.
The most orthodox way of describing it is some kind of ramp, but it cant be straight since it would be twice as big as the pyramid itself then. The inner spiral theory feels much more legit, since they could build both the inner areas and the other walls simultaneously. In fact some of the inner rooms seems somewhat ramp-like, although theyre probably way to steep so its probably just a coincidence.
No project that needs to cut and move 30 times the amount of stone in the empire state building I'd costing 5 billion dollars...not to mention the r and d we'd need just to come up with the riggings to move and position blocks of that weight and the schematics alone would be daunting considering the inner structure.
By Orthodox I'm mostly referring to who is seen to have built it, why and when. Nobody has a monopoly in how.
The [Hoover] dam contains a volume of concrete roughly equal to the stone in the pyramid.*By comparison, the 1,776-foot-tall One World Trade Center being constructed in downtown Manhattan will cost an estimated $4 billion.
Some very light googling and reading have given me estimates between 1 and 17 billion.
The estimate of 5 billion is not from an eqyptologist but an architect.
http://m.livescience.com/18589-cost-build-great-pyramid-today.html
You keep bringing up the empire state, but thats a cherry picked exemple. There are other building projects that used a way larger quantity of material
I think that number is just land mammals over 100lbs in body weight. Pretty interesting number...and scary to think that whatever happened around 12k years ago killed off just as many as are alive today.
We could be hunting giant beavers and ground sloths...but NOOOOOO...
"Material"...not quarried stone. Big difference...regarding the Hoover Dam and the Great Pyramid. Working with concrete with it's molding capabilities and of course being able to pour makes thinks incredibly easy compared to stone work.
And I'll just acquiesce on the building estimate, any true estimate would have to come from the combination of literally dozens of different industries because the task is so multi-dimensional because of the scope and unusual circumstances...anyone estimating that project at 1 Billion has no business estimating anything, so who knows about that source or any of them for that matter.
We use veneers these days to make things look like stone because it's far too expensive and difficult to work with pure stone blocks.
another fun fact...you could build a wall across the united states and back that is 3 feet tall and 1 foot wide out of the amount of stone in the great pyramid.