Alt-right vs. Tea Party

[Smigg]

I always used to think Anita Sarkeesian was worse than Zoe Quinn, but, Anita just saw the gap in the market to get some money, Quinn actually attempted to ruin lives.

 

[Jack V Savage]

What's got you so bent out of shape, Jack? The fact the Alt-Right made the extremely liberal feminists & pro-feminists eat shit for being shitty people?

 

[Madmick]

I always used to think Anita Sarkeesian was worse than Zoe Quinn, but, Anita just saw the gap in the market to get some money, Quinn actually attempted to ruin lives.

Both of them Clinton supporters-- without a doubt.

 

[Smigg]

Both of them Clinton supporters-- without a doubt.

Of course

 

[Islam Imamate]

Wow. Where the heck have you been? It's been all over this forum for months. The guy who is running Trump's campaign and previously ran Breitbart, called Breitbart "the platform for the alt right." The term was coined by Richard Spencer. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_B._Spencer

I only ran into the term on this forum a few weeks but obviously I had seen various members of the movement and their ideas well before that, I just hadn't seen it described as alt right specifically so I don't blame him.

I always used to think Anita Sarkeesian was worse than Zoe Quinn, but, Anita just saw the gap in the market to get some money, Quinn actually attempted to ruin lives.

Really? Zoe Quinn seemed more callous and willing to fuck individual people over whereas Sarkeesian just strikes me as opportunistic and highly partisan. And the biggest red flag for me is Zoe Quinn's hair and piercings. As soon as I saw her somehow I just knew.

 

[Smigg]

Really? Zoe Quinn seemed more callous and willing to fuck individual people over whereas Sarkeesian just strikes me as opportunistic and highly partisan. And the biggest red flag for me is Zoe Quinn's hair and piercings. As soon as I saw her somehow I just knew.

I was late to the party, so I knew that Zoe Quinn shagged a bunch of game journalists, who then gave her positive coverage, and I thought that was it.

Whereas Sarkeesian was instigating her harassment, openly calling for things to be banned, actually meeting games companies to tell them to take stuff out of games, and the whole E3 fiasco.

 

[Islam Imamate]

I was late to the party, so I knew that Zoe Quinn shagged a bunch of game journalists, who then gave her positive coverage, and I thought that was it.

Whereas Sarkeesian was instigating her harassment, openly calling for things to be banned, actually meeting games companies to tell them to take stuff out of games, and the whole E3 fiasco.

Hmm, fair enough. Btw, what E3 fiasco? I was always fascinated by GG but it was just a bit of a hassle to keep up with it and by the time it rolled around I had kind of checked out of the gaming community for some years. I still play games but I tend to play ones that are a few years old and I pay little mind to current events within the industry and community outside a few exceptional cases.

 

[Smigg]

Last Year, Anita Sarkeesian and Jonathan McIntosh went to E3, and the pretty much went there to cause trouble.

- She tweeted a picture of her media credential, claiming that the badges provided were sexist, because they had a picture of a "sexualised girl" on them. It turned out she straight up lied about that, she took a flyer for the game Persona 4, put it into her badge, and then said "They're on all the badges"

- Someone took a picture of her, she said "I didn't consent to having my picture, you're really creepy!" and then took pictures of other people without their consent.

- Railed against games like Doom for being overly violent

- Complained about Dishonoured 2 giving players the choice of being a male or female character, instead of going exclusively female.

She wasn't invited back this year.

 

[grimballer]

It's like a political version of that tv show, "Deadliest Warrior":


What are the similarities, and differences between these two bizarre and ultra aggressive ideological factions? And most importantly, who wins in a policy debate - TO THE DEATH!

Tea party = conservatives opposing big govt n spending (in other words traditional conservatives)

Alt right = new generation of conservatives no longer buying the neocon rhetoric

 

[Falsedawn]

So the main faces or the alt-right aren't minority-hating white people but they still are because you say so? "It's right wing so they have to be racist"

Also nationalism is now = white nationalism because it sounds more racist.

Struggie, I shitposted on Tumblrinaction, was all over Five Guys Burgers and Fries, and migrated to Kotakuinaction when GG got real lulzy.

I no longer visit due to their irreconcilable racism. It's not /b/ or /pol/ being edgelords, it's certified. Now whether or not you associate with the alt-right is on you, but when you sleep with dogs, don't be surprised when you get fleas.

 

[TheStruggle]

Struggie, I shitposted on Tumblrinaction, was all over Five Guys Burgers and Fries, and migrated to Kotakuinaction when GG got real lulzy.

I no longer visit due to their irreconcilable racism. It's not /b/ or /pol/ being edgelords, it's certified. Now whether or not you associate with the alt-right is on you, but when you sleep with dogs, don't be surprised when you get fleas.

Since only your last sentence was in English i'll address that, i'm not alt right but I know many who do. I'm just pointing out how every fringe right group are bigots by default. However the SJ Left or BLM groups are constantly defended in the eyes of the mainstream.

 

[TheComebackKid]

The only people I see mentioning white supremecy are liberal cucks not those who identify as alt right.

Lol @ those falling for the spin.

 

[TheComebackKid]

So we have a Libertarian Canadian, Gay Conservative Brit, a black independent, and a borderline gypsy who all consider themselves to be "alt-right" but somehow they are all still minority hating white people.


Every non liberal is racist according to liberals.

American "liberals" truly cannot be reasoned with

 

[Falsedawn]

Since only your last sentence was in English i'll address that, i'm not alt right but I know many who do. I'm just pointing out how every fringe right group are bigots by default. However the SJ Left or BLM groups are constantly defended in the eyes of the mainstream.

Well when they act like bigots out the gate, what do you expect?

Chan culture already rubs people the wrong way (as it's supposed to), but when people start believing the vitriol that they spew, then you have hate groups. The entire appeal of chans was that it was a place you could go on, call everyone a bunch of s, and be a in the bunch. Take that to real life, and you're rightfully going to be called any number of accurate descriptive terms.

Go to /r/the_donald and see what the "mainstream" alt-right looks like. Hell, go to /r/altright. Nothing but vitriol, complaining, and cancer. At least the most virulent of leftist causes have some sort of underlying goal that elicits sympathy from well meaning people. With the alt-right it's cucks and SJWs all the way down.

 

[WalkenWouldOwn]

Struggie, I shitposted on Tumblrinaction, was all over Five Guys Burgers and Fries, and migrated to Kotakuinaction when GG got real lulzy.

I no longer visit due to their irreconcilable racism. It's not /b/ or /pol/ being edgelords, it's certified. Now whether or not you associate with the alt-right is on you, but when you sleep with dogs, don't be surprised when you get fleas.

 

[Greoric]

I think you need to rethink your definition of "success" there, guy.

Why would I do that... guy?

 

[TheStruggle]

Well when they act like bigots out the gate, what do you expect?

Chan culture already rubs people the wrong way (as it's supposed to), but when people start believing the vitriol that they spew, then you have hate groups. The entire appeal of chans was that it was a place you could go on, call everyone a bunch of s, and be a in the bunch. Take that to real life, and you're rightfully going to be called any number of accurate descriptive terms.

Go to /r/the_donald and see what the "mainstream" alt-right looks like. Hell, go to /r/altright. Nothing but vitriol, complaining, and cancer. At least the most virulent of leftist causes have some sort of underlying goal that elicits sympathy from well meaning people. With the alt-right it's cucks and SJWs all the way down.

4chan is literal AIDS, you can find extreme racism searching for Boating Tips on there. The issue here isn't 4chan. Its that people who had no idea of what the alt right is it just labeling everything alt right and racist. Suddenly Trump, Brietbart, Tea Party, Alex Jones, and anyone who disagrees with the establishment republicans but are still right wing are racist bigots from 4chan.

How can a fringe part of the right suddenly be the leading charge in a mass wave of racism around the world?

 

[TheStruggle]

American "liberals" truly cannot be reasoned with

Nationalism = White Nationalism

Alt-right = 4chan

No Racism = Systematic Racism


Liberals keep trying to make everything about racism and bigots to serve the cause of social justice. You here more about racism from them than actual racists

 

[Falsedawn]

4chan is literal AIDS, you can find extreme racism searching for Boating Tips on there. The issue here isn't 4chan. Its that people who had no idea of what the alt right is it just labeling everything alt right and racist. Suddenly Trump, Brietbart, Tea Party, Alex Jones, and anyone who disagrees with the establishment republicans but are still right wing are racist bigots from 4chan.

How can a fringe part of the right suddenly be the leading charge in a mass wave of racism around the world?

By taking those extremist views, softening them into edible chunks that require literally no thought, and then attaching their ideology to the back end once you've agreed with the statement minus the insinuations. Then, to reinforce these views, they create a specter of the "other" (SJWs, Globalists, Jews, liberals, immigrants, etc...) that are secretly responsible for all your problems. Exactly how most virulent ideologies get propagated in the current day.

Did you see the White Nationalist post I posted where they had guidelines for argumentation so you can prime people into White Nationalism? Seemingly simple things that serve as the "hook" so when you agree with one they have you in the fold. "I mean, you said I was right, right? How can I be wrong now?"

It's just like what I always say about the GOP. I sincerely doubt that all Republicans are racist, but the Republican party itself is stupid racist. Same principle. You might agree with some of their aims and that's cool, but let's not miss the forest for the trees here.

 

[Deleted member 429137]

Why would I do that... guy?

No reason. I forgot i was talking to someone who claims that the only time capitalism impacts people negatively is when the markets aren't free enough.