Discipulus
Black Belt
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2011
- Messages
- 6,217
- Reaction score
- 2
What's your background a guy? And do I know you on Facebook? (PM me!)
He looked pretty much the same to me. He made the same mistakes as usual, most notably his constant pointing of his left foot far outside the opponent's rear foot (resulting in squaring up). He likes it because it lets him land his right hand faster by shortening the path, can be done with a slip to the left and gives him a way to exit. But it makes him very hittable and leaves him in no position to follow up with any good strikes. Opponents are free to counter afterwards. He also does too much hopping for my taste.
If you ask me, Oliveira had the right idea with his footwork and techniques but wasn't skilled enough to pull it off. He was throwing a good amount of jabs, but his jab frankly sucks and Edgar was able to counter it several times with pretty hard right hands (that would have been harder if he didn't point his damn lead foot away). Oliveira tried to use front kicks to keep Edgar away, but he only did it when Edgar was circling instead of coming in and he only threw them with his rear leg, plus his technique was bad. I love how Oliveira was trying to work the clinch when Edgar got in close, but he didn't break Edgar's posture or use his forearms to get any real control so Edgar could either punch out of it or get a takedown before it was secured. I loved the elbows he used a couple times, but he only threw like 2.
Basically, Oliveira did a good job holding his ground for the most part and had some really smart ideas, but not the skills to implement them. His stance is front foot heavy, his technique is sloppy and he wasn't always throwing the right things at the right times.
In my opinion, the key to beating Edgar is to control the range by holding your ground with jabs and teeps when he's rushing, then wear him down with leg kicks on the side he's circling to when he's using that hopping lateral footwork. His footwork really makes him hittable.
this is a key point when people are assessing a fighter, whether a pro/ammy on tv/live event or a guy in their gym; recognizing the holes in someone's game takes a certain skill, making strategies/picking tech takes a certain amount of skill, actually enacting these things takes a certain amount of skill. A lot of people can do the first two, the problem is the last one; it doesn't matter if the book is out on someone if a) you can't read or b) you lack the intelligence to process it.
it is very clear what you need to do to beat edgar, fighters see it/coaches see it/we see it; but you still have to have the tech skills/tools-physical skills/tooks AND the mindset/character/discipline to use them. If my weak points don't play to your strengths, you may not be able to take adv of them; in fact you may end up getting beat the f*ck up. I sparred a guy, ask saamag about this, he was new to the group (only stayed a little while); he was watching me spar and going on and on about all the sh*t I do wrong and how I am open for this and that, an how he would see this or that coming. Not only could he not counter me the way he said he would, he may have seen sh*t coming; but he couldn't do a damn thing about it when it did. An I am not saying I am a bad ass, I am making a point; I don't assume that cause I see an opening that I can instantly exploit it. But I notice a lot of people seem to think this way, not taking into account their lack of ability skill discipline or character.
what good is it recognizing a guy is open for a left hook, when u don't have one or can't throw a good one; what good is it to see a guy doesn't respond to pressure well, when you don't apply it. What good is it to see a guy is open to leg kicks, if you don't consistently throw them; its great you can see it, but it's no good if YOU can't enact it.
as brother naazim said (Hopkins guy), we all know ali fights w/his hands down; now go get him. What he means is everyone sees the hole, but hardly anyone can exploit it at all; much less to the point of winning.
olivera had the right idea, maybe even the right physical tools; but didn't have the tech ones to use it or the discipline to stick to it or the iq to do it at the right time.
Alright, there's a lot of nonsense talk about Weidman's knockout of Silva so I'm gonna do a little explaining of why Weidman deserves a LOT more credit than he's getting from most people....
What about Eddie Wineland? I just watched (and rewatched) his last fight with Brad Pickett, and I was thoroughly impressed with his defensive and offensive footwork. I couldn't find a video obviously, but he was constantly taking angles, using lateral motion, utilizing feints and capitalizing on his opponents offence to land some really nice counters. He was very active with his footwork but was good at staying in range to land shots. At one point Rogan even commented that his footwork is reminiscent of Cruz's, but I think Wineland has better footwork; less jazz and more subtlety. He also maintains great posture. And I love the way he uses the jab to control distance. He seems to really use the jab the way it's meant to be used. All around I think he's quickly becoming one of my favorite fighters to watch in the UFC...
Tbh, I don't think the combo Weidman threw was intentionally done so or even something that may have been worked on - but I think it was rather a result of instinct to throw - but tbh even though you have to give Weidman credit - I think Anderson lost as a result of his own undoing - although he tends to be like that in many fights, he was uncharacteristically prolonged in his doing so in this fight & I feel he did so because he wanted to establish mental superiority as he felt vulnerable prior to the fight & the takedown in round 1 compounded this - felt as though the mental edge was in weidman's corner & felt the need to bring it back to his court & I believe in the action of doing so believed his own hype & suffered for it.
Although if there is a rematch - I think Anderson would take it & not make the same mistake twice.
I stand by my assessment that what Silva was doing is a direct result of Weidman's pressure. I agree that what Anderson did played a part in costing him the loss, but he did what he did BECAUSE of Weidman. Whether he wanted to establish superiority emotionally or he wanted to bait Weidman (which I believe is the case) is mostly irrelevant because either way it comes back to Weidman being in control.
I'm not so sure, because he was showboating even when Weidman didn't do anything - this was because momentarily Weidman was affected by the taunts/showboating (also followed by kicks that Weidman didn't really respond to) this is why his corner were pissed at the end of the first round & were essentially telling him to snap out of it & punch him in the middle of the chest as we all heard - which he did in the latter part of 2nd round - I think. I think Anderson was already nervous coming into this & Weidman's confidence especially early on affected him - at the end of the day, like I said you have to give Weidman his credit but Anderson Anderson'd himself lol --- I think if there is a rematch...Anderson will probably walk away with the belt again, provided if he wants to fight Weidman again which it looked like he didn't.
That's the point. He was taunting because Weidman didn't do anything. He NEEDED Weidman to do something to win the fight, but all Weidman did was bait him right back. There are several times where Weidman even imitates Silva's taunts. At one point Silva claps, so Weidman claps too. I edited my original post above with 2 more gifs. In the second one, you'll see Silva wave Weidman on then Weidman wave him on, and Silva responds by rushing in with a pretty wild 2 punch combination that Chris pulls back from. When Anderson taunts, he expects opponents to attack. Not to taunt and bait him back. That's why he took it to another level. Anderson got a taste of his own medicine and couldn't make Weidman do what he wanted.
Also, if you watch the fight, Anderson only really picks up the showboating after Weidman attacks him. He was trying to encourage the attacks in the hope that they would get more committed, but they never did.
Weidman was too patient and too smart to throw anything that didn't leave him in position to pull back or cut to an angle. He didn't get hit clean in the face by Silva once in that fight and it's because he wouldn't leave openings that he wasn't prepared to immediately defend. If anything, Weidman anderson'd Anderson.
Although Weidman deserves credit, like I've repeatedly stated - I think you might be giving him too much credit if that makes sense --- it was after Weidman took him down instantly he resorted to showboating - also I'd give your point more credence & indirectly Weidman - but there were a few times where Weidman did get baited into attacking or even slightly overextending like the first gif in your post (although he managed to move off centre after) - but notice Anderson really didn't do anything in that whole movement & even after he moved off-centre, if his goal truly was to make him overcommit or bait him, so that he could counter him - he never acted on it - even when Anderson snuffed the 2nd attempt at a takedown from Weidman - he didn't really do anything, just let Weidman go...
I think you're also trying to put sense to Silva's display - when in reality I don't think there was much sense in it - think he simply got carried away with the showboating & there was no real tactic to it but just simple mind games - there might have been initially but it went pretty quickly....I'd point out your last gif to prove this point - does Silva honestly look like he's trying to bait Weidman in that gift at all? He stands completely square & showboats in a similar manner to Prince Naseem, if he really was interested in provoking/baiting or making Weidman over-extended & counter - he could have positioned himself at any time (like he has in the past) to counter any one of those initial punches or even position himself better, which he could have done quite easily if baiting & countering Weidman was his goal - which it looks like to me it wasn't, instead of showboating and maneuvering himself into a poorer posture, from which there was no return defensively - you'd think with his striking prowess he knows how to position himself to bait & counter - but it's quite clear in 2 of the gifs you posted that he didn't position himself in that manner - why - because that's probably not want he had in mind...so the question is why didn't he.....because he got caught up in showboating & didn't respect his opponent enough aka anderson anderson'd anderson lol.
I think it might just be difference of view - maybe it was a mixture of what we're both saying - I have no idea tbh, like you said we can't read fighter's minds - I think it was caused less by Weidman & Anderson's own frailties probably because he was facing someone that was his kryptonite & he knew it - also I'd say he'd given Weidman plenty of impressions that he could land shots - It wouldn't make sense to keep repeatedly doing so - even when at times it made Weidman bite - I think the last gif had nothing to do at all with strategy & Silva was simply showboating...but that's just an opinion.
I'd go with Silva because he has much more experience & will probably be looking to avenge the lost - at least I would want to if I was TKO'd that way.
We can agree to disagree.
It does make sense to think Silva will come back like a monster ready to avenge his first UFC loss, but if his emotions got to him so much in this fight imagine how angry he could be in the rematch, or how focused he could be. It could go either way really. I hope it happens, I'm very interested to see.
Funnily enough, no-one mentioned the technical masterpiece that Frankie put on - it was a breakdown analysts wet dream lol - Oliveira's poor posture is what kept getting him hit - it was awful to watch - at one point I was sure he'd get KO'd or TKO'd - I think if it had been 5 rounds probably would have ended that way - the lateral movement was bliss - funnily enough oliveira's coaches were telling him to throw more front kicks - I thought that was incredibly bad advice thought if anything they should be telling him to throw roundhouses.
Funnily enough, no-one mentioned the technical masterpiece that Frankie put on - it was a breakdown analysts wet dream lol - Oliveira's poor posture is what kept getting him hit - it was awful to watch - at one point I was sure he'd get KO'd or TKO'd - I think if it had been 5 rounds probably would have ended that way - the lateral movement was bliss - funnily enough oliveira's coaches were telling him to throw more front kicks - I thought that was incredibly bad advice thought if anything they should be telling him to throw roundhouses.
The real shame is that the controversy and magnitude of Silva's loss has completely overshadowed Swanson vs. Siver, which was an incredible fight. I was out of my seat when Cub hit that Harai Goshi to counter the takedown in round 2, and the shots he landed in round 3 were absolutely brutal. He gets wild, but he's actually pretty hard to hit cleanly, and he packs so much power that anyone's gonna think twice about trying to put him away.
I just wish he'd jab more. He threw a few more than usual against Siver, so maybe there's hope.
That was a great fight. It was a lesson in distance control. Oliveira didn't have anything to control the range. He couldn't keep Edgar at bay with his jabs (mainly because of his posture and weight distribution) or kicks (not enough leg kicks plus he threw them at the wrong time, very bad front kicks, no actual teeps) and when Edgar got close, he couldn't win in the clinch. He always either got dumped, punched or if he was lucky Edgar would just duck out. In the last 30 seconds of the second round, he managed to keep Edgar at the end of his straight punches and kicks for a bit and was doing pretty well until he came forward to quickly and Edgar tied him up then took him down.
What I really liked that Edgar was doing is attacking with his right hand both over and under Oliveira's left arm. He knew that 99% of the time, when he came forward Oliveira would throw a strike with that arm, whether it be a jab, hook or elbow (should have been an uppercut, though). He took advantage of the opening he knew would be there and started timing the jab to land body shots under the elbow or overhand rights on top of the shoulder and Oliveira never figured it out, even though he got tagged with the same shot over and over. That double threat was smart by Edgar, and I like how he used the right body shot to left hook, then used the same body shot but used the left hook as a push on Oliveira's face to get a takedown.
I think it was more a lesson on proper posture - although Frankie controlled the distance quite well, the defining thing was the poor posture of Oliviera (leaning forward with head quite forward - making the critical distance much shorter - making it easier for Frankie to get his shots in) - preferably he should have focused on throwing more roundhouses rather than linear kicks, especially when someone is exhibiting a lot of lateral movement - also I think it helped that Edgar was smaller height wise - it's a lot harder to takedown or throw a smaller man of balance because the center of gravity is naturally lower - but your right he knew that those straights were coming from that hand & took advantage - very smart kept Oliveira guessing by changing levels - took advantage of Oliveira's striking faults nicely.