2014 War Room Awards

[Jukai]

So KnightTemplar isn't an open racist?
I just kinda assumed he was, considering the recent inundation, and the fact that the Knights Templar are probably second only to the Vikings as BS mythologised "White Warriors", with a bonus anti-muslim twist (Vikings have more Libertarian cred though).

He absolutely is, but he isn't an open Neo-nazi or Stormfronter and Bas probably shoulda just admitted his mistake and moved away from that.

 

[Scrody]

lol you got a link Jack?

 

[Jukai]

They do when you're involved. Like that time you started all that shit in the 2012 thread.

Uh oh!

 

[Anung Un Rama]

Terrorist related?

I was in my car when I heard it in the radio- sounds like a ptsd case, already under control

 

[KnightTemplar]

Looks like I'm not the only one who noticed, Jack.:icon_lol:

I always enjoy seeing like a bas get rustled and accuse others of being racist :icon_lol:

lol best new poster

You know what they say, Like a Bas.

Sometimes you eat the white racist dirtbag. Sometimes the white racist dirtbag eats you.

I mean, I think that is the phrase.

And what exactly does that prove? Other than you have low reading comprehension.

If your position is sound, you shouldn't be getting kicked around by anyone.

Bas is getting Shamrocked. I fear for his e-knee.

In any case, and I raised this point myself, your boy Bas isn't even close to being a challenge for me. I'll just walk away now.

With Bas's soul as my trophy,:icon_twis

 

[KnightTemplar]

He absolutely is, but he isn't an open Neo-nazi or Stormfronter and Bas probably shoulda just admitted his mistake and moved away from that.

Son, don't make me Bas-smirch you!:icon_chee

 

[Jukai]

Son, don't make me Bas-smirch you!:icon_chee

Don't get cocky, bud, I'll slap you back to your WWII high school history club

 

[IDL]

I'm not going to watch each and every one of those videos. I skimmed the Larry McDonald video, where you mention "he was killed shortly after". Yes, on a commercial airline that was shut down by the russian military.
Are you implying the Rockerfeller family controls the russian military? If so, are you then implying that they're so stupid that they would actually kill Larry McDonald in a way that would gather the most attention possible?

I mean, we've done this so many times IDL. I bet I could choose any of those videos and then debunk most, if not all, of the claims in it. I spend 30 secs on that Larry McDonald video and it already reeks.

Skipped right to the end cheater! Having not watched any of the other stuff I agree it's easy to dismiss. I get it. If I only watched that one video with nothing else I could have also dismissed it. Piece of cake. It's like disagreeing with an answer without doing the math.

It's about the collection, and the thread of truth. I can find faults in anything too, it's easy. If finding a fault is victory conditions, then we can live our lives in a state of victory forever and completely miss the gems and be none the wiser.

I understand how you are approaching it. looking for a reason to dismiss, rather than entertaining the possibility that there is something there and seeing if there is anything worth gleaning.

That's why there isn't much point if there is little curiosity or interest.

 

[Scrody]

Suddenly a wild IDL appears!

 

[KnightTemplar]

Don't get cocky, bud, I'll slap you back to your WWII high school history club

You're a Poet and you didn't know it!

Just as long as you bear witness, then. Let the word go forth from this time and place; whenever a Sherdogger has suffered the most painful and humiliating defeat imaginable - it shall, forever more, be known as a Bas-mirchment.:icon_twis

 

[Ruprecht]

Interesting that IDL has gone back to posting actual material (well... links to youtube docos anyway). I thought he was strictly into uttering vague pronunciations about "them" and the occasional reference to 1984, abusing poor Orwell.

 

[UpaLoompa]

I understand how you are approaching it. looking for a reason to dismiss, rather than entertaining the possibility that there is something there and seeing if there is anything worth gleaning.

If your evidence and premises are routinely demonstrated as being faulty, contradictory, and logically inconsistent, when do you move on?

 

[IDL]

If your evidence and premises are routinely demonstrated as being faulty, contradictory, and logically inconsistent, when do you move on?

Not understanding someone's point of view does not mean it is logically consistent or not. The only way to do that is to understand the basis before coming to any conclusions.

So, understanding comes first before disagreement.

 

[UpaLoompa]

Not understanding someone's point of view does not mean it is logically consistent or not. The only way to do that is to understand the basis before coming to any conclusions.

We all understand your point of view and you have routinely demonstrated how your arguments are often self-contradictory and logically inconsistent.

 

[IDL]

We all understand your point of view and you have routinely demonstrated how your arguments are often self-contradictory and logically inconsistent.

Based on your understanding, not mine. We would be basing logical consistency on different things.

If I am drawing from a different data set, then it only seems reasonable that my conclusions wouldn't reconcile with yours.

 

[Jukai]

Suddenly a wild IDL appears!

 

[Thames]

Skipped right to the end cheater! Having not watched any of the other stuff I agree it's easy to dismiss. I get it. If I only watched that one video with nothing else I could have also dismissed it. Piece of cake. It's like disagreeing with an answer without doing the math.

It's about the collection, and the thread of truth. I can find faults in anything too, it's easy. If finding a fault is victory conditions, then we can live our lives in a state of victory forever and completely miss the gems and be none the wiser.

I understand how you are approaching it. looking for a reason to dismiss, rather than entertaining the possibility that there is something there and seeing if there is anything worth gleaning.

That's why there isn't much point if there is little curiosity or interest.

Please go ahead. Find any of my posts or threads, and start to debunk one of my arguments. That's what most of us spend our time doing here in the WR, except you. I would like to see you in action.
This is how you construct a theory:

You can't find faults in everything. That's just a bogus statement. It's not just that I have a pessimistic attitude towards your theories. It's that most of your theories are demonstratively wrong. So why would I entertain the possibility of it being true, when I with certainty can prove it wrong?

Of course I can't prove that the Rockerfelllers are not controlling the russian military, and are shooting down commercial airlines, to kill a politician whose theories no one listens to.
But that statement is so far fetched that it would require some very concrete evidence to make anybody listen to it. Everyone can make controversial statements. It's the evidence that's interesting. Something you have consistently failed to provide.

 

[IDL]

Please go ahead. Find any of my posts or threads, and start to debunk one.
This is how you construct a theory:

You can't find faults in everything. That's just a bogus statement. It's not just that I have a pessimistic attitude towards your theories. It's that most of your theories are demonstratively wrong. So why would I entertain the possibility of it being true, when I with certainty can prove it wrong?

Of course I can't prove that the Rockerfelllers are not controlling the russian military, and are shooting down commercial airlines, to kill a politician whose theories no one listens to.
But that statement is so far fetched that it would require some very concrete evidence to make. Everyone can make controversial statements. It's the evidence that's interesting. Something you have consistently failed to provide.

I can't find fault in everything, you caught me on an exaggeration. Perfection for example. I can find no fault in. you got me. If you said 2 + 2 = 4, I could also find no fault.

As for the rest, you are setting up an argument that I never made. I know you have no intention of taking anything seriously, so I guess we can continue to banter for entertainment purposes?

 

[Thames]

I can't find fault in everything, you caught me on an exaggeration. Perfection for example. I can find no fault in. you got me. If you said 2 + 2 = 4, I could also find no fault.

As for the rest, you are setting up an argument that I never made. I know you have no intention of taking anything seriously, so I guess we can continue to banter for entertainment purposes?

Wtf?
I am trying to explain to you why I don't read your theories with an open mind.
You're saying I'm making a strawman? I'm not even presenting any of your theories. I'm presenting how I think (and how most other people think) you should make theories, and explaining why you're failing in that respect.

And why do you say I don't take anything seriously? I'm actually making a serious argument here. Not ridiculing you or anything.
Sure you can banter on if you want. Or you can respond to my actual argument?

 

[Like A Bas]

Son...just stop. Please. This started out as fun, but now I feel like I'm beating the crap out of Professor Steven Hawkings. You're about as much of a challenge as drunken collage girl who's just been dumped by her boyfriend on Valentine's Day.

You got Shamrocked. Curb Stomped. Besmirched. I made you wear lipstick and turned you into my prison bitch. Just lie back, like a good little girl, and enjoy it.:icon_twis

Let's grant you that I was maximally wrong about you. That you're not a Nazi-sympathizer who greatly admires people who sneak hateful ideologies into institutions. That leaves you as only being a great Nazi-admirer and a racist, who admires people who sneak hateful ideologies into institutions.

I'm not sure why this warrants such a boast. It still leaves you an ass and a fool. And I'm still in the ballpark if not exactly correct. Further, you got caught red-handed lying about wanting to use racial slurs. You copy and pasted a post of yours and edited it to appear less racist.

I think you didn't do quite as well as you believe you did. My conclusion is that you think very highly of me, and thus you see my mistaking your great admiration of Hitler and the Nazis for sympathy as an earth-shattering victory.


Also, it's Stephen Hawking. No 's'.

You're new here.

The award threads always involve bickering and bringing up old topics.

This is the War Room.

well in that case