- Joined
- Feb 19, 2006
- Messages
- 5,274
- Reaction score
- 0
Nice argument KK. I love it how people who don't know shit about boxing try to shit on it by making totally irrelevant arguments like "getting hit with a baseball bat" or the infamous "Would you prefer Mike Tyson hit you with a 16s or 4s?"
Shit I don't think anybody wants to get hit with a baseball bat regardless of how much padding there is on it. That's like me saying, "Would you prefer to get shot with a .40 round or a .45 round?" Oh and these people somehow think boxing matches are fought with 16s.
BTW, referring back to the cut issue, do you think smaller gloves or bareknuckles cause more cuts? I would assume they would but then again, most people assume smaller gloves mean more brain damage. I have no personal experience because I never had any cuts on my face ever. Is there any historical information about cuts during the bareknuckle days?
Shit I don't think anybody wants to get hit with a baseball bat regardless of how much padding there is on it. That's like me saying, "Would you prefer to get shot with a .40 round or a .45 round?" Oh and these people somehow think boxing matches are fought with 16s.
BTW, referring back to the cut issue, do you think smaller gloves or bareknuckles cause more cuts? I would assume they would but then again, most people assume smaller gloves mean more brain damage. I have no personal experience because I never had any cuts on my face ever. Is there any historical information about cuts during the bareknuckle days?