- Joined
- Oct 10, 2015
- Messages
- 1,249
- Reaction score
- 0
Which bell?Also Rigo by KO just after the bell.
Which bell?Also Rigo by KO just after the bell.
The liberty bell.Which bell?
Rigondeaux only beats him by KO. He's not going to outpoint Lomachenko.
Which bell?
That's because you post so much rubbish. I should have just have learnt to ignore it by now.....Bullshit. You spend more time talking about me in these threads than you do Lomachenko.
C'mon it's not just 'rough stuff'. That would have been a few low blows, a butt or two not over 100 low blows. That should have been a DQ if it was any decent referee in there.No, it was a real loss. rough stuff happens in the pros, Lomachenko tried to cherry pick a title from a guy he thought was old and got smacked around. He whined about the size difference and now is fighting a guy coming up 2 weight classes.
True, but just as Loma's lone loss has it's issues being definitive, so is the circumstances with which Rigo found his way to the canvas on occasion. I always saw it as an unchallenged fighter just being lazy and losing focus or getting himself off balance. It's not like he didn't dominate the fights he got KDd in. Basically, to get to my point with less words, I don't think with too much concerns on the KDs.
I suppose I should. When it was Jacobs/Golovkin, I didn't obsess about Jacobs' career KDs he suffered, wrote them off and the one KD in his GGG fight was the only reason anyone could convince me why the judges had it how they had it.
If anything, it's the size he (Rigo) gives up gives up that worries me the most. I'm not worried about Loma's volume or extra gears. Volume didn't help any Mayweather opponents, they all punched less and got stung for missing more. When two equally accomplished amateurs meet, they're gonna both look a lot less invincible. Loma more than Rigo because Rigo spends less energy and will tire Loma with more and more missing.
I'll always take the defensive fighter over the aggressive one, especially when everything is so tightly matched.
Nah. DQ's are rare. Guys like Salido know how to fight dirty and get away with it. Like it or not, that's the pro game.C'mon it's not just 'rough stuff'. That would have been a few low blows, a butt or two not over 100 low blows. That should have been a DQ if it was any decent referee in there.
is the pro game also to miss weight?Nah. DQ's are rare. Guys like Salido know how to fight dirty and get away with it. Like it or not, that's the pro game.
Which bell?
Trick question, Rigo is deaf.
is the pro game also to miss weight?
and i can see plenty of pros who don't do any of this dirty shit and still manage to win fights consistently.
why anyone gives salido a pass for that bullshit of a performance is beyond me.
Your right, Loma throws hard and light punches, mixes everything up very well, cuts angles like a hot knife thru butter and hits hard for a man his size. Rigondeaux is a wizard imo though, his angles and power punches are always well timed and he is elusive as fuqq, this is a fight that needs to happen, would be a huge draw imo, for the real boxing fansI agree that Lomachenko work rate will be affected by the illusive Rigo but make no mistake Lomachenkos conditioning is superb and I very much doubt he will tire. He also is efficient in his own way not alway throwing his shots with full power but mixing up light punches and heavier shots. And the type of volume that Lomachenko puts out is hard to deal with, he cuts more angles than even prime Pacman. Should be interesting either way as Rigo then Loma are the two best defence artists in boxing right now.
View attachment 273021 Rigo is one hell of a well rounded boxer Loma is beating up guys i rarely heard of, imo Rigo beats Loma's ass and decodes "the matrix Lomanchenko".
They both have been fighting lesser skilled adversaries. That's why this fight make so much sense. Lomanchenko needs to sign to fight Rigo already and stop fighting lesser opponents. No?Who did Rigo beat who you've heard of besides Nonaire? And Nonaire, Rigos best win, lost to Walters, who Loma made quit.
Sure, that happens in the pros. Thats why when a fighter misses weight, the other side gets a cut of the purse or has the option to cancel the fight. Lomachenko took the money and fought anyway. And lost.is the pro game also to miss weight?
and i can see plenty of pros who don't do any of this dirty shit and still manage to win fights consistently.
why anyone gives salido a pass for that bullshit of a performance is beyond me.