- Joined
- Nov 29, 2010
- Messages
- 8,378
- Reaction score
- 6,911
He's unbelievably unfunny.
Last edited:
Oh contraireOne reason to love the UFC: it saved the world from hundreds of Rogan's "comedy" appearances.
His audience is casual UFC fansI enjoy Joe as a "personality", I think he's a very interesting man and his podcast is great. But I never, ever found him funny. I can't think of one instance off-hand during his stand up or podcast where he actually made me laugh. He seems to be better suited as a set up guy for legit funnymen like Joey Diaz.
Brogaine will choke u in if he hearz u boiiiOne reason to love the UFC: it saved the world from hundreds of Rogan's "comedy" appearances.
One reason to love the UFC: it saved the world from hundreds of Rogan's "comedy" appearances.
Rogan's hilarious. It's ok if you don't think so though, a sense of humor isn't something you can force.
Witty comeback, truly.It's ok if you were born with a bad sense of humor.
I love a few of his comedy bits. He often yells too much for my taste. I often find him hilarious in his podcast though and makes me laugh out loud
I find his stand up to be complete garbage, mediocre at best, but I enjoy his podcast and commentary, he seems genuinely funny when he is natural and not trying to be funny.I enjoy Joe as a "personality", I think he's a very interesting man and his podcast is great. But I never, ever found him funny. I can't think of one instance off-hand during his stand up or podcast where he actually made me laugh. He seems to be better suited as a set up guy for legit funnymen like Joey Diaz.
I understand there was a fraudulent study. I also know those ingredients were toxic and removed. Again, I was playing devil's advocate.It was removed because it was no longer necessary due to advancements in development.
It also happened before the uprising of the anti-vax loons. The thoroughly debunked, fraudulent study was published in 1998 and didn't catch fire with the tin foil crowd for a while. The person behind it was barred from practicing medicine years later because of it. He was planning to profit from the scare it induced and the testing/screenings that might have resulted. He was a con artist and some people still haven't caught on.
Do you remember any of his funniest bits in comedy or on the podcast? I'm totally willing to reverse my position on Joe because I do like him a lot, I just can't think of anything off hand that's made me laugh.
Do you remember any of his funniest bits in comedy or on the podcast? I'm totally willing to reverse my position on Joe because I do like him a lot, I just can't think of anything off hand that's made me laugh.
Facts are your friend, not bro science.I understand there was a fraudulent study. I also know those ingredients were toxic and removed. Again, I was playing devil's advocate.
Perhaps you're young, but people have been crying foul about vaccines long before 1998. The study just made it worse.
says right In the article that It contains ethylmercury.. lmao
"fact" is a funny thing In science. Nothing Is absolute. What we know to be true Is constantly changing.