Greg Hardy is already a top 10 HW. Let’s put feelings aside and be real here

Hardy would make Tai consider taking his athletic career serious and dropping to 205lbs.

Hardy would have Tai drinking through a straw instead of a boot when he’s through with him.

Stockholm wife confirmed.
 
That's a very sensible stance to take, and I agree to an extent, but keep in mind that Rumble has said that he "hated fighting", and only did it because he was a good athlete and it came to him naturally. So he basically showed up for a paycheck like most 9-5ers. GSP has also echoed similar sentiments.

Wladimir Klitschko used to say similar things. He admitted that we wasn't really a natural fighter in the tough guy sense, just an amazing athlete with the physical attributes needed to be successful. And that's in boxing which in terms of the level and depth of talent is still light years ahead of MMA.

People keep saying "athleticism is not that important in fighting" but this just simply isn't true.
 
And heavyweight has Curtis Blaydes, Volkov, Overeem, Ngannou, JDS... much stronger top five imo

I don't see how anybody would think that but you're entitled to that opinion
 
Let’s be honest, Greg Hardy would KO Tai Tuivasa next month if they fought. And Tai is supposed to be the best HW prospect in the ufc currently (Blaydes is already a legit contender).


Morals and character aside, Greg is a legit A-level athlete and might be the first legit A-level guy to enter the UFC in his physical prime. 29 years old. Plus he is training at ATT already.

Only guys who can give him trouble are Blaydes or Stipe with their elite wrestling . Maybe Ngannou..but remember Hardy comes from the NFL so he probably already has better cardio than Ngannou, plus a better supplement regimen.

UFC is desperate for PPV sales and people will tune in to hope to see Hardy get KTFO. They will fast track him to a title shot by helping him avoid elite wrestlers on the way up.

Greg Hardy will challenge for the UFC HW title before 2019 ends. Calling it now.
View attachment 393247



why do people attack him for some alleged crime...something he was never charged for? we live in an age where women are out to get men...that should be very obvious with everything going on today...men are the target. so if some broad claims he did something, that automatically means he's guilty? Sorry, but that's not how things work...there's a reason why no charges for filed and there's a reason why he wasn't prosecuted...cause there is no case...It's a typical woman out to get a man...
 
Dude is a life long martial artist,5th degree bb in TKD,trained mma for many years to stay in shape,officially announced he would be fighting in 2007 before finally starting his 2 fight stint in 2010 training with arguably the best camp in the world at the time.You're downplaying it quite a bit but he was a monster for his age and pro mma experience.Plus he's fricken Hershel Walker so it was just cool af,but he didn't just decide to all of a sudden have 2 fights with no or very little mma training.

As far as the Hardy hype lol,were going to have to hear this shit all the time now =/ A-level athlete bro,champ in 12 days of mma training if he wanted.

I'm not downplaying anything, or at least I'm not trying to. My point was that Herschel was a legit freak of nature as far as athletic ability. The guy was fighting in a cage at almost 50 years old and looked shredded. I have no idea how that could be real unless he was juiced.
 
Look how far Overeem got with a glass chin. Look how far Lesnar got despite not being 'ok getting hit to the face.' That's despite the fact that neither of those two are A-level athletes. American football players play through serious concussions all the time; most of them would be fine in MMA.

Maybe not by the time he was in the UFC but prime Lesnar was an A+ level athlete.
 
A level athlete gets clipped hard once and he becomes a B level athlete, gets clipped again C level athlete and so on...

all any UFC HW has to do is connect twice and their on a level playing field in terms of athleticism...?

or does that only work with belts...?

you can’t train chin, heart, and instincts, that all gets figured out once a fighter has faced legit competition.

GH may have some raw untapped potential, but we need a bigger sample size before anyone declares him a legit UFC HW, as DC would say “there’s levels to this”
 
That fight had the first guy to land was going to end it. Hardy flew back from a jab. Both guys were throwing heat. Hardy just landed first. Nice win and hightlight ko
 
Wladimir Klitschko used to say similar things. He admitted that we wasn't really a natural fighter in the tough guy sense, just an amazing athlete with the physical attributes needed to be successful. And that's in boxing which in terms of the level and depth of talent is still light years ahead of MMA.

People keep saying "athleticism is not that important in fighting" but this just simply isn't true.
It's really quite an ignorant view actually.

Hand speed, foot speed, reflexes, balance, power, timing, all matter a ton.

A guy like Forrest Griffin when fighting mostly similar fighters can get by being very poor in most of those areas because he has massive heart and no quit in him (in his prime) but when you put him up against an A-Level athlete who also has massive heart and that fighting spirit his weaknesses stand out. He looks slow as molasses and is often punching air as his hand speed and adjustments and reflexes are just slow comparatively.

This is what happens when someone has the athleticism gap over another and while not all just athleticism that is the key to the differences when you see him fight other A level fighters like Toney.

 
I don't see how anybody would think that but you're entitled to that opinion
Teixeiria is trash, Rumble is an easy win for any wrestler and retired, DC came from and is back fighting at heavyweight and Jon jones has fought twice in about four years

it ain't close
This is one of the more ignorant things a fan of MMA can think.

Every aspect of Athleticism, toughness, heart, balance, coordination, reflexes, strength, conditioning, that athletes have to exhibit to make it into the top ranks of their chosen sport, is meaningful in fighting.

This is the fallacy right here.

NOTHING guarantees you anything in any sport including fighting so using that as a bar is meaningless.

What we can be certain is that if 100 A-Level Athletes enter MMA training with top camps and 100 people from all groups who are not all A-Level Athletes entered MMA along similar lines there would be vastly more from the A-Level Athlete camp making it in MMA than the other. No one should doubt that.



Sure. We have seen the same for individual top BJJ or Wrestlers as well. Some of the most decorated in those sports could not cut it in MMA. So that means nothing.
Toughness and heart are not related to athleticism.

Athleticism is meaningful, but I'll say it again, it's far down the list of relevant traits in fighting.

In your 100 v 100 compariso, I would not say 'vastly more' from top sports would succeed and in fact I doubt the number would be much higher st all among athletes. If you take a random guy off the street with no inclination to fight or do anything athletic, the comparison doesn't make sense.

So how about you take 100 people who actually did walk in and sign up with a top level gym? And compare that to 100 athletes from top sports? The difference would be close to zero, even though it's impossible to prove because those guys will never try their hand at fighting.

And your last paragraph pretty much explains why you agree with me lol
 
Teixeiria is trash, Rumble is an easy win for any wrestler and retired, DC came from and is back fighting at heavyweight and Jon jones has fought twice in about four years

it ain't close

HW has Stipe and that's it. Blaydes is still green behind the ears and unproven. Overeem has been competing for over 2 decades, same with Hunt and Werdum. JDS is shot beyond belief. Beating guys like that doesn't make Volkov elite either. Guys like Overeem, Hunt, Arlovski, JDS aren't even supposed to be near the top 10 anymore anyway but since the division is so fucking weak the grandpas are still able to linger around the top 10. Other than Stipe there are no prime elite fighters at HW. With DC moving up there are 2. DC at least is still relatively young in mma years.
 
Teixeiria is trash, Rumble is an easy win for any wrestler and retired, DC came from and is back fighting at heavyweight and Jon jones has fought twice in about four years

it ain't close

Toughness and heart are not related to athleticism....

Of course they are.

Top Tier sports screen for this at the highest level all through the process. You are not going to make it through the high school comp, the university comp, the levels and levels of challenge you face to make it to the next level without toughness and heart.

I would say toughness and heart are even more important than raw athletic skill in making it to the Pro ranks.

There are many talented guys you will play with over the years who just does not have the oughness and heart and do not cut it.
 
HW has Stipe and that's it. Blaydes is still green behind the ears and unproven. Overeem has been competing for over 2 decades, same with Hunt and Werdum. JDS is shot beyond belief. Beating guys like that doesn't make Volkov elite either. Guys like Overeem, Hunt, Arlovski, JDS aren't even supposed to be near the top 10 anymore anyway but since the division is so fucking weak the grandpas are still able to linger around the top 10. Other than Stipe there are no prime elite fighters at HW. With DC moving up there are 2. DC at least is still relatively young in mma years.
I feel like you could say pretty much the same exact thing for light heavyweight, just switch out the names. Gus is really the only exception. It's a two man division... and with Jones gone there's only one. And he doesn't even have the belt lol.
Of course they are.

Top Tier sports screen for this at the highest level all through the process. You are not going to make it through the high school comp, the university comp, the levels and levels of challenge you face to make it to the next level without toughness and heart.

I would say toughness and heart are even more important than raw athletic skill in making it to the Pro ranks.

There are many talented guys you will play with over the years who just does not have the oughness and heart and do not cut it.
Idk man, lots of people who are not 'tough' orndont have 'heart' in the NBA, MLB, soccer, Olympics.....

I feel like toughness and heart are two things required to make it in contact sports, but they're separate from athleticism and talent imo.
 
Wanna see his wrestling and ground game before jumping on board
 
...

Athleticism is meaningful, but I'll say it again, it's far down the list of relevant traits in fighting.

In your 100 v 100 compariso, I would not say 'vastly more' from top sports would succeed and in fact I doubt the number would be much higher st all among athletes. If you take a random guy off the street with no inclination to fight or do anything athletic, the comparison doesn't make sense.

So how about you take 100 people who actually did walk in and sign up with a top level gym? And compare that to 100 athletes from top sports? The difference would be close to zero, even though it's impossible to prove because those guys will never try their hand at fighting.

And your last paragraph pretty much explains why you agree with me lol

I'll again say I think that is ignorance to think things like reflexes, balance, hand speed, foot speed, power do not matter much. If you have poorer reflexes, poorer balance, slower hand speed, slower foot speed, less power than invariably you are not going to have success against someone who also has heart and toughness but also all those other things.

And we are just going to fundamentally disagree (and could not disagree more) if you think if you took 100 of the top A level athletes across all sports VS 100 guys who could not cut it and include the ranks of Costco tire changers and you think if you put them all in the same camps with the same training that the lesser athletic guys will do nearly as well.

And no my last paragraph does not. My last paragraph speaks to the expectation that any individual should be able to cut it. Lesner is the perfect example. He had most of the attributes to be a great in this sport but he does not take getting hit well. that is something you will find in both A level athletes and lesser athletes. But it certainly would be more common in lesser athletes as top athletes are constantly tested for toughness in other areas.

You keep going back, wrongly to the idea that because you cannot know at an idividual level therefore you cannot know at a group level. That is wrong.

I can know that if you took 100 A level athletes, and 100 lesser athletes, and 100 average Joes who never played a sport in their lives that in each instance the success rate to making it as a pro fighter would drop and drop precipitously.
 
Absolutely. MMA hardcores are in denial if they really think that the best physical specimens for fighting are currently in the UFC. Keep in mind that Hardy ain't even the best guy for MMA; I think JJ Watt is physically superior to Hardy in every way.

Jon Jones has said something similar in the past about his older brother being able to destroy Cain Velasquez (who was champ back then) pretty easily, despite not having any MMA training.
NFL fanboy spotted^

PS- Fat f**k Arthur wouldn't pass any USADA testing and would be out of breath from taking the p*ss test
 
I ...

I feel like toughness and heart are two things required to make it in contact sports, but they're separate from athleticism and talent imo.
M'eh I don't think you are going to get past this point but I will repeat again.

In the general populace there are tons of people TOO how lack heart and toughness and yet if enough of them get into MMA and into top camps some will be screened up to success because despite not having the athleticism they have heart and toughness.


So WHY you think that if enough A Level athletes got into MMA in their prime and trained similarly that we would not see similar levels or more who have heart and toughness AND the other athletic aspects is just silly.

If you think real life outside top tier A level athletics is the best screen for toughness and heart then we are just not on the same page.

If you compare it the guys who make it to the top of the A level sports get put to the heart and toughness test far more than the other groups do.

(this is where you point out not all of them have it therefore thinking that has meaning here and it does not unless you say all of everyone else does)
 
I'll again say I think that is ignorance to think things like reflexes, balance, hand speed, foot speed, power do not matter much. If you have poorer reflexes, poorer balance, slower hand speed, slower foot speed, less power than invariably you are not going to have success against someone who also has heart and toughness but also all those other things.

And we are just going to fundamentally disagree (and could not disagree more) if you think if you took 100 of the top A level athletes across all sports VS 100 guys who could not cut it and include the ranks of Costco tire changers and you think if you put them all in the same camps with the same training that the lesser athletic guys will do nearly as well.

And no my last paragraph does not. My last paragraph speaks to the expectation that any individual should be able to cut it. Lesner is the perfect example. He had most of the attributes to be a great in this sport but he does not take getting hit well. that is something you will find in both A level athletes and lesser athletes. But it certainly would be more common in lesser athletes as top athletes are constantly tested for toughness in other areas.

You keep going back, wrongly to the idea that because you cannot know at an idividual level therefore you cannot know at a group level. That is wrong.

I can know that if you took 100 A level athletes, and 100 lesser athletes, and 100 average Joes who never played a sport in their lives that in each instance the success rate to making it as a pro fighter would drop and drop precipitously.
Brock Lesnar had a combat sports background and was successful in fighting


I just don't buy the fact that NFL and NBA players could have success in fighting just based on their genetics. Fighting requires a lot more before it requires athleticism and the best athlete will get dominated by an unathletic nerd if the nerd has the technique and more importantly, the will to hone and then implement those techniques in a chaotic situation
 
M'eh I don't think you are going to get past this point but I will repeat again.

In the general populace there are tons of people TOO how lack heart and toughness and yet if enough of them get into MMA and into top camps some will be screened up to success because despite not having the athleticism they have heart and toughness.


So WHY you think that if enough A Level athletes got into MMA in their prime and trained similarly that we would not see similar levels or more who have heart and toughness AND the other athletic aspects is just silly.

If you think real life outside top tier A level athletics is the best screen for toughness and heart then we are just not on the same page.

If you compare it the guys who make it to the top of the A level sports get put to the heart and toughness test far more than the other groups do.

(this is where you point out not all of them have it therefore thinking that has meaning here and it does not unless you say all of everyone else does)
Shooting a basketball or running full speed into a runner in the NFL doesn't translate in any way to fighting technique. It's that simple. They'd beat a lot of similarly skilled fighters, but they wouldn't get far on their athleticism alone. It's just the way fighting is. It's not comparable to other sports and their athletes.
 
I wonder if an athletic commission would sanction him fighting a top ten guy.
 
Back
Top