• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Crime X/Twitter's French headquarters raided

Andy Capp

President of the War Room
@plutonium
Joined
Aug 20, 2009
Messages
50,848
Reaction score
35,762
It's hard to believe there isn't a thread about this already (or none that I could find).


The French offices of Elon Musk's X have been raided by the Paris prosecutor's cyber-crime unit, as part of an investigation into suspected offences including unlawful data extraction and complicity in the possession of child pornography.
The prosecutor's office also said both Musk and former X chief executive Linda Yaccarino had been summoned to appear at hearings in April.
In a separate development, the UK's Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) announced a probe into Musk's AI tool, Grok, over its "potential to produce harmful sexualised image and video content."
X is yet to respond to either investigation - the BBC has approached it for comment.
It has previously characterised the French investigation as an attack on free speech.
The investigation began in January 2025 when French prosecutors started looking into content recommended by X's algorithm, before being widened in July that year to include Musk's controversial AI chatbot, Grok.
In a post at the time, X said the action was "politically-motivated" and denied allegations it had manipulated its algorithm.
Following today's raid, French prosecutors say they are now investigating whether X has broken the law across multiple areas.
Among potential crimes it said it would investigate were complicity in possession or organised distribution of images of children of a pornographic nature, infringement of people's image rights with sexual deepfakes and fraudulent data extraction by an organised group.

New UK investigation​

Meanwhile, UK authorities have given an update on their investigations into sexual deepfakes created by Grok and shared on X.
The images - often made using real images of women without their consent - prompted a barrage of criticism in January from victims, online safety campaigners and politicians.
The company eventually intervened to prevent the practice, after Ofcom and others launched investigations.
In an update on Tuesday, Ofcom said it was continuing to investigate the platform and was treating it as "a matter of urgency".
But it added it was currently unable to investigate the creation of illegal images by Grok in this case because it did not have sufficient powers relating to chatbots.
However, shortly afterwards the ICO said it was launching its own probe, in conjunction with Ofcom, into the processing of personal data in relation to the Grok.
"The reports about Grok raise deeply troubling questions about how people's personal data has been used to generate intimate or sexualised images without their knowledge or consent, and whether the necessary safeguards were put in place to prevent this," said William Malcolm, the ICO's executive director for regulatory risk & innovation.
In late January, the European Commission announced an investigation into its parent company xAI over concerns about the images.
A Commission spokesperson said it was in touch with France over its search of X's office in Paris.

'Not a free country'​

Pavel Durov - founder of the messaging app Telegram - criticised the French authorities on Tuesday, accusing France of being "the only country in the world that is criminally persecuting all social networks that give people some degree of freedom".
"Don't be mistaken: this is not a free country," he added in a post on X.
Durov was arrested and detained in France in August 2024 over alleged moderation lapses on his messaging app, which the Paris prosecutor's office said had failed to curb criminal activity.
He was permitted to leave the country last March after the platform made some changes to the way it operates following the arrest.
These included sharing some user data with authorities in response to legal requests.

Prosecuting Elon Musk needs to be part of the Democratic platform going forward. They're pretty spoiled for choice with regards to things to go after him for. There's election interference, securities fraud, CSAM distribution, violation of antitrust laws, etc., and that's all BEFORE even touching on the recent Epstein files revalations.
It wouild be great if they were to hop on the banwagon; no doubt about that.
 
I know there are a lot of busy threads on the go ATM but I'm still surprised this is getting so little attention.

Perhaps there's not really anything to add without more information; I understand that. But just in case it's just been overrun by other threads, I thought I might as well bump it.
 
oh-no-top-gear.gif
 
once again proving america is a failed state with no balls whatsoever
 
"The reports about Grok raise deeply troubling questions about how people's personal data has been used to generate intimate or sexualised images without their knowledge or consent, and whether the necessary safeguards were put in place to prevent this," said William Malcolm, the ICO's executive director for regulatory risk & innovation.
In late January, the European Commission announced an investigation into its parent company xAI over concerns about the images.

Can't this done on any random AI image generator?
 
Can't this done on any random AI image generator?
I think the point is they are not doing much of anything to prevent it. But also I just think this is an example of law makers not understanding how AI works instead reacting to buzz words
 
Can't this done on any random AI image generator?
Not as far as I know. Many (if not all the others) have adopted policies that supposedly prevent it though I admit I haven't tried to verify if it's true or not, of course.

I think the point is they are not doing much of anything to prevent it. But also I just think this is an example of law makers not understanding how AI works instead reacting to buzz words

That's also true; both are reasons explain why it is attracting so much attention.
 
Not as far as I know. Many (if not all the others) have adopted policies that supposedly prevent it though I admit I haven't tried to verify if it's true or not, of course.
Chatgpt and Microsoft's Co Pilot which are two of the biggest ones don't allow for the production of any sexually explicit content whatsoever.
 
Not as far as I know. Many (if not all the others) have adopted policies that supposedly prevent it though I admit I haven't tried to verify if it's true or not, of course.


That's also true; both are reasons explain why it is attracting so much attention.
Chatgpt and Microsoft's Co Pilot which are two of the biggest ones don't allow for the production of any sexually explicit content whatsoever.

Grok.com actually has pretty strict content moderation.
 
Grok.com actually has pretty strict content moderation.
It does now but before mid January it did not and anyone could add a photo of someone into and have Grok undress them plus it was easy to create AI generated porn included those of children. Elon knew this and did nothing about it until the news started reporting on it and putting pressure in Elon to stop it
 
Back
Top