I'm not sure that your description of the vote is necessarily reflective of the participants in political discourse. That is, I don't think disaffected moderates that went to Bernie were all that engaged in the primary process. The group that was engaged was disproportionately left and disproportionately young.
I don't want to get too deeply into this because I would have to reacquaint myself with the reports. But my recollection is that even Warren's own staffers sided with Sanders' version of the events, that no one confirmed Warren's version, and that Sanders' version was the only one that was remotely consistent with his past actions (namely, urging Warren to run in the previous cycle). Yet Warren confirmed on the stage (iirc) her claim that Sanders flat out said "a woman can't win."
I kind of expected to drift toward your position (that it wasn't a big deal) over time. But, more than a year later, it still strikes me as a particularly toxic and unseemly thing: to purposefully leak a report like that, which has no bearing on policy but rather is specifically aimed at an opponent's character, in a pivotal point in a race and to then more or less refuse to engage the topic and instead feign indignation.
Damn. We disagree greatly here as well.
Omar is an iconic character to me. He was pretty unprecedented as a character. Gay, black, functionally illiterate, a violent criminal, and yet exceptionally moral and revered by all. Probably the first gay character in a major drama to become a fan favorite of straight white men.
Can't think of any other characters I was really interested in. Frank Sobota obviously. A couple of the kid actors, Wee Bey's son and the kid who looked like Lil Bow Wow.
I'm not meaning it as a pejorative. I think there needs to be a term to describe the phenomenon of culturally updated standards of discourse, especially when language varies so much by class. And I think there has been a process of partial reclamation and de-stigmatization of "woke" by the left. Anyways, what I meant was that I would expect that CTH would be more sensitive to sexism and problematic language (using "undocumented" rather than "illegal" immigrant, using "transgender" rather than "transgendered" or "transsexual," etc.).
However, as an aside, I do think that scorning about language (or what Michael Brooks called "woke-scolding") can be problematic, particularly when it is done across class. Having been a working class person in upper class contexts, I can attest to it being very humiliating at times.