• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Social WR Lounge v261: Opium-Free Heroin, for those trying to quit but still wanna shoot up!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kid just wants some Damn breakfast
ad9.gif
 
@superking



20210504-030021.jpg


<Dany07>

"Black Shampoo" is still the worst song of their entire catalogue though.



Why not take him with you? :p





You ever considered trying Renova? It's Tretinoin with an emollient base and will all but for a fact significantly reduce those visible lines and wrinkles, it's FDA approved to do so. You can also cop generic tubes of it for like $7 a pop. I'm just worried your ginger ass (not literally) would be too sensitive to handle the strength and rate of cell turnover, which could actually make things worse. There are other much pricier options though, and the where is no less critical than the what and why here because the vast majority of products are bunk.

What: GHK-Cu

Why: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6073405/

The human peptide GHK (glycyl-l-histidyl-l-lysine) has multiple biological actions, all of which, according to our current knowledge, appear to be health positive. It stimulates blood vessel and nerve outgrowth, increases collagen, elastin, and glycosaminoglycan synthesis, as well as supports the function of dermal fibroblasts. GHK’s ability to improve tissue repair has been demonstrated for skin, lung connective tissue, boney tissue, liver, and stomach lining.

GHK has also been found to possess powerful cell protective actions, such as multiple anti-cancer activities and anti-inflammatory actions, lung protection and restoration of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) fibroblasts, suppression of molecules thought to accelerate the diseases of aging such as NFκB, anti-anxiety, anti-pain and anti-aggression activities, DNA repair, and activation of cell cleansing via the proteasome system. Recent genetic data may explain such diverse protective and healing actions of one molecule, revealing multiple biochemical pathways regulated by GHK.[1]

Up-to-date, it is established that GHK-Cu is able to:

- Tighten loose skin and reverse thinning of aged skin

- Repair protective skin barrier proteins

- Improve skin firmness, elasticity, and clarity

- Reduce fine lines, depth of wrinkles, and improve structure of aged skin

- Smooth rough skin

- Reduce photodamage, mottled hyperpigmentation, skin spots and lesions

- Improve overall skin appearance

- Stimulate wound healing

- Protect skin cells from UV radiation

- Reduce inflammation and free radical damage

- Increase hair growth and thickness, enlarge hair follicle size

Most authors would attribute effects of GHK to its ability to bind copper(II) ions. It was proposed that because of the GHK’s small size and its ability to bind copper, it can play a crucial part in copper metabolism [2]. However, since 2010, a new mechanism has started to emerge. The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard has created the Connectivity Map—a publicly available library of transcriptional responses to known perturbagens, substances that modulate gene expression [3].

This tool allowed researchers to investigate genome-wide effects of GHK and establish that GHK-Cu is able to up- and down-regulate a significant number of human genes. Today, it has become possible to connect biological effects of GHK-Cu and its effects on gene expression, to develop a more comprehensive view on GHK’s mechanism of action [4].


Where: https://aseircustom.com/products/ghk-cu-royal-blue-serum

^ That is the topical variation and obviously specific to skin (anti) aging. GHK also comes in a crystallized peptide form that must be reconstituted and administered through sub-q injections with an insulin syringe to grab all of the aforementioned body-wide benefits. There's also a rather potent HGH secretatgogue that would go rather well with it to maximize the natural output of your pituitary gland (no Gorilla Rogan Gut type shit), but it's "grey market" and you need a legit lab. I ain't gonna post the source for that on the main though.


I always thought U-God's verse from Cypress Hill's Temples of Boom was good:



I played that album non-fucking-stop in '95/'96.

Also one of the best album titles ever.
 
Why?

I'm genuinely ignorant about why that would be bat. FYI, I'm a cigarette smoker, enjoy the occasional cigar, but hate weed.
In America most potheads just want to smoke pot. Tobacco just feels a lot harsher and dirtier in comparison.
For the exact same reason that violence is highly regulated in society.
I personally think when it comes to violence we have too much red tape
<{JustBleed}>
 
My 1st coach was NOT a fan of half unless it was butterfly half and loved x guard. I love half and how it branches off into so many different positions and I always start off most rolls with x or butterfly.

I like half butterfly as lot but did not quite have it down. It def transitions well to X (ie if you try to sweep him on the same side as the butterfly hook and he post).

How do u start a roll in x?
 
Ehtheist was another one that was OK, but he was a troll. So some occasionally good exchanges, but a lot of garbage, too. I think it's before your time, but SDW and TCK used to go at it pretty good and to be pretty evenly matched back when SDW was more liberal, though he was still a Ron Paul fan when that was a thing. HN and TCK also were serious and roughly evenly matched rivals. Pan and I used to get into it more (he was also a Ron Paul fan).

shrimp and HN used to routinely dismantle TCK
 
Don't we try to prevent violence because it's generally unpleasant?
That's not a major reason, but it's one of them. All sorts of unpleasant things are out there and not highly regulated.

Violence and sex both are darwinian things; they both determine who gets to live to see the future (vicariously or otherwise). As such, they hold the keys to the ultimate biological reward; if they are unregulated, justice cannot be established. Who could contest that the good ought to live on, and the wicked should perish?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top