Crime Would you support labeling ALL street gangs as terrorists?

Pretty consistent with you're level of understanding on most topics.

I understood your "point".

It was so boring and has been repeated so often on here I thought I'd make light of the situation :)👍

Hope that's okay with you, sheep.
 
As Carver says, he'd be OK with it if it wasn't for all the kids. You're supporting a lawless open air drug market with little kids doing cocaine and heroin all over the place.
Which is throwing out the baby with the bathwater (aka the point of the episode, the need for nuance and multifaceted approaches). Not to mention Carver is climber and crooked. Colvin reporting actual drops in crime is also a big deal.

You seem to not understand what you watched and the kind of Trumper to unironically argue that Starship Troopers the movie isn't satire.

Where am I supporting a lawless open air drug market? You are truly an idiot, this is lazy even by your dead brain standards. You still haven't even been able to form the most basic of thoughts as to what the Wire says about terrorism.
what's important is the number of people killed, not the method.
i'd have no problem with these gangs getting the worst denomination possible.
That's not how laws work. Terrorism is about intent, not how many people die. Same as genocide, or the difference between murder and manslaughter.
 
I wouldnt cry over it. Whatever locks them up for life or worse is fine by me.
 
LIke they just did with MS13 and Tren de Aragua

It's pretty bad in LA and cities like Chicago. The crimes they commit, the innocents that die each year that get caught up in their shootings. The people they rob and kill, the homes they break into.

Would you support labeling all street gangs as terrorists?
- If they did that, that would water-down the designation. In the case of MS13 and Tren(kinda ironic name, since they arent swollen) i agree.
 
Nothing like that is necessary. Especially if DAs would actually do their job (s) and prosecute via all of the felony gun laws already in place.
 
The message is for people to do everything possible to stay clear and separate from gang members and gang activity.

And you’re fine with innocent people going to jail to send this message.
Pathetic.
 
This is the first step to label other groups as “terrorist” groups. The Republican Authoritarian regime has already called their political opponents terrorists.

Now they can cart you off to a different country to disappear you. First will be “gang members” next it’s you.
 
Oh cool nobody has mentioned anything about trannies as terrorists yet. I guess today is a merciful day. Happy Easter!
 
LIke they just did with MS13 and Tren de Aragua

It's pretty bad in LA and cities like Chicago. The crimes they commit, the innocents that die each year that get caught up in their shootings. The people they rob and kill, the homes they break into.

Would you support labeling all street gangs as terrorists?
Of course getting rid of street gangster is a good thing... but terrorists are typically foreign born.
 
Of course getting rid of street gangster is a good thing... but terrorists are typically foreign born.
Terrorism doesn't have anything to do with the origin of said terrorist. A lot of people here really want to a word (and legal definition) with a very narrow definition to mean something else.

A lot of these are similarly mistaken and convinced that designating gang members terrorists unlocks magic legal or law enforcement powers or something.
 
A 9 month old was killed in her home because she got hit with a stray bullet from a drive by here recently, only a week after another kid died from another stray bullet from a drive by

No no no, I've been assured a million times that the answer to gun violence is more guns. Because if the people someone has a problem with has guns, then they wont want to aggressively against each other because someone will end up dead. No way d*ckheads with guns totally disregard their enemies also having guns and end up killing innocent people.

But I'm sure there is some other reason youd likely suggest that these guys with guns indeed are perfectly willing to engage knowing they will encounter guns. I'm gonna say I confidently believe that you feel there's just something about these particular people that just makes their brains not abide by the idea that if someone else has a gun, they shouldn't risk a shootout.

Why only black and brown? There are a metric fuck ton of white gang members.
Lol, I replied to his first post without even realizing that the racism showed up in the 2nd post.
 
A random thread on Sherdog?
First the regime sends gang members out of the country, ignored the judicial branch, and is know to have taken people that were not gang members. There was no due process for anyone involved.

Then Trump said he would take US citizens and ship them to prison camps out of the United States. Once again, a blatant violation of the constitution.

Trump and the Republican Authoritarians will move to label their political opponents at terrorist and use the power of the government to make them disappear.

It’s a playbook that’s been run may, many times through history.

You cannot see this?
 
First the regime sends gang members out of the country, ignored the judicial branch, and is know to have taken people that were not gang members. There was no due process for anyone involved.

Then Trump said he would take US citizens and ship them to prison camps out of the United States. Once again, a blatant violation of the constitution.

Trump and the Republican Authoritarians will move to label their political opponents at terrorist and use the power of the government to make them disappear.

It’s a playbook that’s been run may, many times through history.

You cannot see this?

Also remember, how does one prove they're NOT in a gang? In the Cops doing wrong thread there are multiple videos of Cops wrongly associating people in the direct vicinity of each other. As in I stand beside a gangbanger and suddenly its "hey who is your friend? Why are you with him? Did you know he shot someone yesterday? You're being detained." I have tattoos. Uh oh, I'm in a gang. Cant have tatts anymore unless they're the Aryan celebration ones a-la Pete Hegseth.

Cant wear a bulls Jersey.

Cant wear a specific hat.

And if you dont do it, they can add one in post-production.

As I mentioned in another thread the Constititon guarantees Freedom of Assembly. Not that the people willing to sell rights for "security" give a sh*t about the Constitution or actual freedom you can feel. But that guarantee alone renders being part of a "gang" as a constitutional right. Nothing is illegal until something illegal is done. Suggesting that gangs are terrorists is just a means to further police people and remove rights because you dont like them, or are scared of them. It's a side-step to render a constitutional freedom as an implied crime, and make it an actual crime eventually.
 
And you’re fine with innocent people going to jail to send this message.
Pathetic.

It's either sacrifice a few "innocent" affiliates and dismantle gang culture or...sacrifice innocent men, women, & children from continued gang violence, stray bullets, robbery, ect.

Those are your choices.
 
Terrorism doesn't have anything to do with the origin of said terrorist. A lot of people here really want to a word (and legal definition) with a very narrow definition to mean something else.

A lot of these are similarly mistaken and convinced that designating gang members terrorists unlocks magic legal or law enforcement powers or something.
Yeah you are right. Domestic terrorism is a thing.
 
Back
Top