- Joined
- Apr 8, 2017
- Messages
- 1,037
- Reaction score
- 0
I agree. Thats why I've never said this was an exciting fight, or that Woodley put on an exciting performance.
I'm not prepared to defend an argument I never made.
How exactly can you wreck someone an admittedly boring and largely uneventful fight? Is that not a contradiction in terms? You emphasized that he stuffed a bunch of takedowns. It's impressive but does that really constitute wrecking your opponent? What about standing and blocking your opponent's punches as you do nothing in return? I understand that it's obviously beneficial to play defense but you don't score offensive points in doing so unless you counter. The only real example of significant offense from Woodley was one big punch landed in a five-round fight. That is not going to put asses in the seats. Even if you try to glamorize it with flashy terms like "wrecked." He did a fantastic job of doing the bare minimum to win the fight.
Present to me the welterweight who beats Lawler, Wonderboy and Maia in a row.
What does that have to do with his fighting style which often times involves large bouts of inactivity? This isn't a debate about winning, losing or fight record. It's about how you win.
Go back and watch his fight with Rory (which he lost and was taken down). He looked like a deer caught in headlights most of the time did he not? It's not like I am inventing something brand new out of thin air. This pattern of his has been well established over time and recognized by most fight fans.