- Joined
- Sep 7, 2011
- Messages
- 3,561
- Reaction score
- 4,847
I think whether you are on the right or on the left we can all agree on one thing. At least this happened to a white person.
You still have to convince people that there was a reasonable threat. And we have the video where, despite you straight up lying about the encounter, she was not about to crash into any officer that required her to immediately be shot.
Nor was the officer who shot her three times in the hospital lucky to be alive, as trump said. Do you even have the integrity to confront that lie?
Moving target lolRegardless of wether anyone feels the shooting was justified or not, that was some precise shooting to get three hits on a moving target while simultaneously jumping out of the path of a moving vehicle.
IPSC champ level shit right there.
Edgelord detectedI think whether you are on the right or on the left we can all agree on one thing. At least this happened to a white person.
So we're at the point where police are justified to kill when there is no threat to their lives? Come on.Yes but not anymore by the time he was shooting.
You calling another poster a zealot is fucking wildIncorrect.
I don't have to convince you. You and the zealots have already made up your minds because it's politically convenient to your desired agenda.
It doesn't matter if YOU believe it was a reasonable threat. What matters is if it was a reasonable assumption in the moment for the officer to fear for is life.
She wasn't complying with orders and then hit him the officer with her vehicle, and her tires were spinning because of the ice.
You can your ilk can post whatever slow-motion clips and imply he wasn't 'reasonably threatened' after an obvious overanalysis... But in the moment without the luxury of intense deliberation... he acted reasonably because she could have gunned it and ran him over.
Even if an leftist-activist prosecutor wanted to pursue this in court the officer has a textbook self-defense case and no 12-person jury would convict.
That's another reason why no charges will be filed.
Incorrect.
I don't have to convince you. You and the zealots have already made up your minds because it's politically convenient to your desired agenda.
It doesn't matter if YOU believe it was a reasonable threat. What matters is if it was a reasonable assumption in the moment for the officer to fear for is life.
She wasn't complying with orders and then hit him the officer with her vehicle, and her tires were spinning because of the ice.
You can your ilk can post whatever slow-motion clips and imply he wasn't 'reasonably threatened' after an obvious overanalysis... But in the moment without the luxury of intense deliberation... he acted reasonably because she could have gunned it and ran him over.
Even if an leftist-activist prosecutor wanted to pursue this in court the officer has a textbook self-defense case and no 12-person jury would convict.
That's another reason why no charges will be filed.
Yeah that's not how it works dumb fuck, you don't get to kill anyone you want and say, "I was in fear for my life" and act like that's reasonable justification. That's your mush brain at work.Incorrect.
I don't have to convince you. You and the zealots have already made up your minds because it's politically convenient to your desired agenda.
It doesn't matter if YOU believe it was a reasonable threat. What matters is if it was a reasonable assumption in the moment for the officer to fear for is life.
No one was getting run over and she was obviously turning to the right, so clearly you didn't watch the video and parrot the same bullshit, or your eyes don't work and you're legit stupid.You try to run over someone with a gun in their hands? ...gee, I wonder how that's going to end![]()
I think whether you are on the right or on the left we can all agree on one thing. At least this happened to a white person.
There are no injuries, he wasn't hit by anything, he killed someone because he knew he could get away with it, or he's such a scared pussy that he pissed his pants and shot in blind fear, which is someone who shouldn't have a gun.One thing I haven't seen addressed.........
Let's assume he didn't pull his gun out. What would have happened? He'd have the exact same whatever minor injuries he got and she would most likely have been pulled over and arrested down the road. So what did pulling a gun and shooting her really do?
Idk I'd get out of the way before pulling a gun in that situation
Nah dawg, he stepped aside into perfect position to shoot her point blank, I don't think that showing merits the Presidential Medal of Freedom Trump is going to award him or an IPSC title.Regardless of wether anyone feels the shooting was justified or not, that was some precise shooting to get three hits on a moving target while simultaneously jumping out of the path of a moving vehicle.
IPSC champ level shit right there.

On the foreign policy front, we're at the "blatant land grab" stage. Domestically, we're at the "papers please, AND I'LL FUCKING KILL YOU IF YOU DON'T SHOW THEM" stage. Shit, they're building concentration camps too. They started with camps for "illegals", but Utah's already building camps for homeless people, and I'm sure other states will follow suit before it eventually becomes federal policy. Next it'll be trans people or "antifa". Anyone who denies the fact that the Trump regime is fascist either has their head so far up their own ass that it'd take an excavator to pry it free, or they're lying fascist swine.They should all have them, especially considering they're masked and don't have to identify themselves, and while they're at it how about a standard uniform? What's the purpose of this group dressing up like mercenaries with assault rifles? I mean I get it if they're tasked to hunt down known dangerous illegals but to have this crew just roaming around stereotyping everyone to see who they can arrest seems arguably fascist.
I mean look at the meaning, "someone who supports fascism, a far-right, authoritarian ideology emphasizing extreme nationalism, a strong central government led by a dictator, suppression of opposition, militarism, and placing the nation above the individual.", it seems to describe Trump's Administration pretty well except for the last line which he only feigns.
<TrumpHuggingFlagGif>
Quote my words when I've backtracked.You're already backtracking on the claim that the guy was directly in front of the car when he shot, when he clearly wasn't.
If that happens be sure to let us knowYou try to run over someone with a gun in their hands? ...gee, I wonder how that's going to end![]()
I don't know if you're just being sarcastic but if not you should seek help. I know you don't want to hear it but the first step to recovery is acknowledging that you have a problem.
Wow ... You're really pretending 'self-defense' doesn't exist and deflecting to a bullshit hypothetical.Yeah that's not how it works dumb fuck, you don't get to kill anyone you want and say, "I was in fear for my life" and act like that's reasonable justification. That's your mush brain at work.