Crime Woman in Minneapolis Executed by ICE Officers; White House Reflexively Hand Waves Murder

You still have to convince people that there was a reasonable threat. And we have the video where, despite you straight up lying about the encounter, she was not about to crash into any officer that required her to immediately be shot.

Nor was the officer who shot her three times in the hospital lucky to be alive, as trump said. Do you even have the integrity to confront that lie?

Incorrect.
I don't have to convince you. You and the zealots have already made up your minds because it's politically convenient to your desired agenda.

It doesn't matter if YOU believe it was a reasonable threat. What matters is if it was a reasonable assumption in the moment for the officer to fear for is life.

She wasn't complying with orders and then hit him the officer with her vehicle, and her tires were spinning because of the ice.

You can your ilk can post whatever slow-motion clips and imply he wasn't 'reasonably threatened' after an obvious overanalysis... But in the moment without the luxury of intense deliberation... he acted reasonably because she could have gunned it and ran him over.

Even if an leftist-activist prosecutor wanted to pursue this in court the officer has a textbook self-defense case and no 12-person jury would convict.
That's another reason why no charges will be filed.
 
Regardless of wether anyone feels the shooting was justified or not, that was some precise shooting to get three hits on a moving target while simultaneously jumping out of the path of a moving vehicle.
IPSC champ level shit right there.
Moving target lol

Moving at about as fast a tortoise and from point blank range

Whats kind of impressive in a fucked up way is that in the aftermath he was as cool as a cucumber, looked like just another day at the office
 
Incorrect.
I don't have to convince you. You and the zealots have already made up your minds because it's politically convenient to your desired agenda.

It doesn't matter if YOU believe it was a reasonable threat. What matters is if it was a reasonable assumption in the moment for the officer to fear for is life.

She wasn't complying with orders and then hit him the officer with her vehicle, and her tires were spinning because of the ice.

You can your ilk can post whatever slow-motion clips and imply he wasn't 'reasonably threatened' after an obvious overanalysis... But in the moment without the luxury of intense deliberation... he acted reasonably because she could have gunned it and ran him over.

Even if an leftist-activist prosecutor wanted to pursue this in court the officer has a textbook self-defense case and no 12-person jury would convict.
That's another reason why no charges will be filed.
You calling another poster a zealot is fucking wild
 
Incorrect.
I don't have to convince you. You and the zealots have already made up your minds because it's politically convenient to your desired agenda.

It doesn't matter if YOU believe it was a reasonable threat. What matters is if it was a reasonable assumption in the moment for the officer to fear for is life.

She wasn't complying with orders and then hit him the officer with her vehicle, and her tires were spinning because of the ice.

You can your ilk can post whatever slow-motion clips and imply he wasn't 'reasonably threatened' after an obvious overanalysis... But in the moment without the luxury of intense deliberation... he acted reasonably because she could have gunned it and ran him over.

Even if an leftist-activist prosecutor wanted to pursue this in court the officer has a textbook self-defense case and no 12-person jury would convict.
That's another reason why no charges will be filed.

You're already backtracking on the claim that the guy was directly in front of the car when he shot, when he clearly wasn't. So you are either lying, or just went to bat for your side without even knowing what happened.

He's clearly by the side of her car with her turning away from him with no one in immediate danger of her 2mph acceleration. So yes, a jury could very well conclude that there was no imminent threat to anyone that justified lethal force.
You gotta remember, some people on the jury may not be the type to want to keep the Esptein files hidden, so they very well could think differently than a trump supporter.
 
You try to run over someone with a gun in their hands? ...gee, I wonder how that's going to end :rolleyes:
 
Incorrect.
I don't have to convince you. You and the zealots have already made up your minds because it's politically convenient to your desired agenda.

It doesn't matter if YOU believe it was a reasonable threat. What matters is if it was a reasonable assumption in the moment for the officer to fear for is life.
Yeah that's not how it works dumb fuck, you don't get to kill anyone you want and say, "I was in fear for my life" and act like that's reasonable justification. That's your mush brain at work.
 
One thing I haven't seen addressed.........
Let's assume he didn't pull his gun out. What would have happened? He'd have the exact same whatever minor injuries he got and she would most likely have been pulled over and arrested down the road. So what did pulling a gun and shooting her really do?
Idk I'd get out of the way before pulling a gun in that situation
 
One thing I haven't seen addressed.........
Let's assume he didn't pull his gun out. What would have happened? He'd have the exact same whatever minor injuries he got and she would most likely have been pulled over and arrested down the road. So what did pulling a gun and shooting her really do?
Idk I'd get out of the way before pulling a gun in that situation
There are no injuries, he wasn't hit by anything, he killed someone because he knew he could get away with it, or he's such a scared pussy that he pissed his pants and shot in blind fear, which is someone who shouldn't have a gun.
 
Regardless of wether anyone feels the shooting was justified or not, that was some precise shooting to get three hits on a moving target while simultaneously jumping out of the path of a moving vehicle.
IPSC champ level shit right there.
Nah dawg, he stepped aside into perfect position to shoot her point blank, I don't think that showing merits the Presidential Medal of Freedom Trump is going to award him or an IPSC title. {<shrug}
 
They should all have them, especially considering they're masked and don't have to identify themselves, and while they're at it how about a standard uniform? What's the purpose of this group dressing up like mercenaries with assault rifles? I mean I get it if they're tasked to hunt down known dangerous illegals but to have this crew just roaming around stereotyping everyone to see who they can arrest seems arguably fascist.

I mean look at the meaning, "someone who supports fascism, a far-right, authoritarian ideology emphasizing extreme nationalism, a strong central government led by a dictator, suppression of opposition, militarism, and placing the nation above the individual.", it seems to describe Trump's Administration pretty well except for the last line which he only feigns.

<TrumpHuggingFlagGif>
On the foreign policy front, we're at the "blatant land grab" stage. Domestically, we're at the "papers please, AND I'LL FUCKING KILL YOU IF YOU DON'T SHOW THEM" stage. Shit, they're building concentration camps too. They started with camps for "illegals", but Utah's already building camps for homeless people, and I'm sure other states will follow suit before it eventually becomes federal policy. Next it'll be trans people or "antifa". Anyone who denies the fact that the Trump regime is fascist either has their head so far up their own ass that it'd take an excavator to pry it free, or they're lying fascist swine.
 
Yeah that's not how it works dumb fuck, you don't get to kill anyone you want and say, "I was in fear for my life" and act like that's reasonable justification. That's your mush brain at work.
Wow ... You're really pretending 'self-defense' doesn't exist and deflecting to a bullshit hypothetical.
 
Back
Top