- Joined
- Nov 17, 2007
- Messages
- 10,878
- Reaction score
- 13
Nick Diaz, maybe.
Nah. Brawling isn't smart against GSP.
Nick Diaz, maybe.
You don't have to compete in boxing matches to know how to box. He has excellent combinations, good footwork, and overall good defense. His boxing is technically sound, especially considering he's only trained for a few years.
Chuck was the last "sprawl & brawler" i could think of as a champ. Besides his defensive wrestling to keep the fight standing Chuck just loved to throw and knock fools out.
Leben, really???? Umm, Lombard haha
Nick Diaz will NEVER taste gold in the UFC. He refuses to evolve.Nick Diaz, maybe.
JDS certainly isnt a boxer. He never boxed or kick boxed in a sanctioned event in his whole life neither amateur or professional. Sorry to bust your bubble.
What has that got to do with anything? Being a brawler has nothing to do with your background, it has to do with your style and technique. Anderson could have come from a cricket background, he still wouldn't be a brawler with his current skill set.
What has that got to do with anything? Being a brawler has nothing to do with your background, it has to do with your style and technique. Anderson could have come from a cricket background, he still wouldn't be a brawler with his current skill set.
Dos Santos boxing is sloppy for ''only boxing'' standards. He has lots of power and a pretty good jab but i think he's a brawler with great chin and great tdd. Like Chuck was.
You don't have to compete in boxing matches to know how to box. He has excellent combinations, good footwork, and overall good defense. His boxing is technically sound, especially considering he's only trained for a few years.
What does Anderson have to do with the horrible technique of JDS? It is obvious that Anderson has good boxing,footwork and head movement...JDS does not have any of those things. He swings looping right hands like Chuck....but not anywhere near as fast.