Wilder vs Fury 2 Feb.22nd FOX/ESPN joined PPV

MMALOPEZ said:
Click to expand...

Apparently BT have been advertising that they have Wilder v Fury 2 for ages as well. They also advertised that they wouldn't put UFC on PPV which they've also done
 
Wilder fighting the best guy and highest ranked guy in the division. Who has been very active and is not coming off any long layoff. Also in his prime.

Wonder how this will get spun or hated on.
 
WklySportsMemes said:
Wilder fighting the best guy and highest ranked guy in the division. Who has been very active and is not coming off any long layoff. Also in his prime.

Wonder how this will get spun or hated on.
Click to expand...

Fury hasn't beaten a top 20 opponent in the last 4 years.
 
PUO3 said:
I thought the masses gave him the Wilder fight though?
Click to expand...
They must protect AJ's resume at all cost. . . Even if that means clear contradictions.
Or pretending Wyte Parker Ruiz or the Wlad that was beat by Fury Is actually better than Fury.
 
codfather said:
AJ's resume is thin too, it's just slightly less thin than Fury's and much less thin than Wilder's.
Click to expand...
That's heavyweight boxing.... there is no depth.
The fact that the best 2 guys are going to fight eachother in a best of 3 outweighs fighting 3-4 overweight or over the hill fighters that are a clear tier below.
 
codfather said:
AJ's resume is thin too, it's just slightly less thin than Fury's and much less thin than Wilder's.
Click to expand...
AJ has a solid list....Wlad, Whyte, Povetkin, Ruiz, Parker. Martin and Takam too.

Pretty solid for 23 fights at heavyweight. He's scalped most title holders of his era.
 
WklySportsMemes said:
That's heavyweight boxing.... there is no depth.
The fact that the best 2 guys are going to fight eachother in a best of 3 outweighs fighting 3-4 overweight or over the hill fighters that are a clear tier below.
Click to expand...

Wlad put together a pretty good resume without even fighting his brother.
 
codfather said:
Wlad put together a pretty good resume without even fighting his brother.
Click to expand...
Wlad had a career that stretched 16 years.
With a TON of cans and journeymen at the end because that's what the heavyweight division became. Not his fault.
However, what does that have to do with what's available to Fury and Wilder over decade later?
I think both Fury and Wilder are better than Rahman Brewster and Sanders.

People acting like Fighting Parker Whyte or Ruiz is some type of legacy booster. Like they are the 3 kings or something.
 
codfather said:
Between Joshua, Fury, Wilder and Ruiz, their best wins are:
1. Fury UD 12 Wlad (2015)
2. Ruiz TKO 7 Joshua (2019)
3. Joshua TKO 11 Wlad (2017)
4. Joshua UD 12 Ruiz (2019)
5. Joshua TKO 7 Povetkin (2018)
6. Wilder TKO 10 Ortiz I (2018)
7. Wilder KO 7 Ortiz II (2019)

Those are their only wins worth talking about.
Click to expand...
Ortiz is worth talking about but Parker and Whyte aren't???
 
WklySportsMemes said:
Wilder fighting the best guy and highest ranked guy in the division. Who has been very active and is not coming off any long layoff. Also in his prime.

Wonder how this will get spun or hated on.
Click to expand...

It won’t, because for once he is fighting a legit opponent.

He absolutely deserves the shit he has taken in the past. Its actually idiots like you that try to spin his last fight as fighting the best, when we all know he actually fought a fat coke head instead of the guy he’d been calling out, and for less money. lol, and you’ve even admitted the shit you’ve spouted in your last post
 
Last edited:
Jonny Ninja said:
It won’t, because for once he is fighting a legit opponent.

He absolutely deserves the shit he has taken in the past. Its actually idiots like you that try to spin his last fight as fighting the best, when we all know he actually fought a fat coke head instead of the guy he’d been calling out, and for less money. lol, and you’ve even admitted the shit you’ve spouted in your last post
Click to expand...
Admitted what?
Funny you mention "fat coke head. " You probably speak from 1st hand experience

It's a rematch genius. Same guy as before. You get how that works right lmao? Now magically because Fury fought 2 bums and looked very bad against the last one it's soooooo much different. Nah same guy. It's just removing your conspiracy theory that Wilder only fought Fury because he knew Fury was a ruined fighter.

Real life told us Fury was in shape. Well trained. Well prepared and at his best when he fought Wilder the 1st time.

Again if your false narrative was true he wouldn't have went after an immediate rematch let alone sign up to fight the guy he didnt beat 2 more times.
Hes actually taking the toughest challenge in the division which the exact opposite of your false narratives and crybaby accusations.
 
WklySportsMemes said:
Admitted what?
Funny you mention "fat coke head. " You probably speak from 1st hand experience

It's a rematch genius. Same guy as before. You get how that works right lmao? Now magically because Fury fought 2 bums and looked very bad against the last one it's soooooo much different. Nah same guy. It's just removing your conspiracy theory that Wilder only fought Fury because he knew Fury was a ruined fighter.

Real life told us Fury was in shape. Well trained. Well prepared and at his best when he fought Wilder the 1st time.

Again if your false narrative was true he wouldn't have went after an immediate rematch let alone sign up to fight the guy he didnt beat 2 more times.
Hes actually taking the toughest challenge in the division which the exact opposite of your false narratives and crybaby accusations.
Click to expand...
Sorry mate but that's bullshit. Wilder clearly saw Fury as a soft option first time around. And if we are honest a lot of us were in agreement. There were countless threads on here about how likely it was that Fury would show up in shape and make it to fight night. The guy was a loose cannon and had looked shit in two build-up fights and before that was way out of shape having hit over 400lbs and done enough coke and booze to kill 10 normal men and added to that he admitted mental health issues. The guy was a mess. But now you are acting as those this didn't happen? lol be honest for a second.
The fact that Fury came in and shocked the world in that first fight does not validate Wilder's original decision to fight him. Wilder saw him as a soft touch, he got it wrong but then most of us did too.
 
aries said:
Sorry mate but that's bullshit. Wilder clearly saw Fury as a soft option first time around. And if we are honest a lot of us were in agreement. There were countless threads on here about how likely it was that Fury would show up in shape and make it to fight night. The guy was a loose cannon and had looked shit in two build-up fights and before that was way out of shape having hit over 400lbs and done enough coke and booze to kill 10 normal men and added to that he admitted mental health issues. The guy was a mess. But now you are acting as those this didn't happen? lol be honest for a second.
The fact that Fury came in and shocked the world in that first fight does not validate Wilder's original decision to fight him. Wilder saw him as a soft touch, he got it wrong but then most of us did too.
Click to expand...
Yet he booked 2 more fights with him after he struggled with him and technically didnt beat him.
So now he knows Fury is not a soft option and is fighting him twice. You cant keep glossing over and ignoring that FACT just because it doesn't suit your narrative.

You guys critique his resume in every thread.
If he didnt fight him and said "I'm not fighting Fury because he needs multiple tune up fights and to prove hes sober and in shape 1st..."
You guys would be saying he ducked Fury and you know it.

Doesn't fight Fury = Duck
Fights comeback Fury =Picking weak opposition
Fighting prime Fury twice = Ignore
 
WklySportsMemes said:
Yet he booked 2 more fights with him after he struggled with him and technically didnt beat him.
So now he knows Fury is not a soft option and is fighting him twice. You cant keep glossing over and ignoring that FACT just because it doesn't suit your narrative.

You guys critique his resume in every thread.
If he didnt fight him and said "I'm not fighting Fury because he needs multiple tune up fights and to prove hes sober and in shape 1st..."
You guys would be saying he ducked Fury and you know it.

Doesn't fight Fury = Duck
Fights comeback Fury =Picking weak opposition
Fighting prime Fury twice = Ignore
Click to expand...
No it's not glossing over the facts because it was true! You are the one trying to gloss over the facts. Wilder saw Fury as an easy mark in their first fight. You are getting too defensive about Wilder. I give him full credit for rematching Fury BUT you can't pretend that he didn't think it would be an easy win the first time around. I thought Fury had a good chance of pulling off the upset but most people didn't. Maybe you can share a post of your's before the first fight saying how good you think Fury was?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,237,050
Messages
55,463,703
Members
174,786
Latest member
JoyceOuthw

Share this page

Back
Top