• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Why you should delete "Pandora"


82733-why-not-both-meme-5LvD.jpeg
 
Bullshit. They're terrorists. It's a hate group devoted to acts of violent or economic terrorism-- to disrupting the peace and deepening civil unrest-- that needs to be added to the registry of hate groups maintained by bodies like the Southern Poverty Law Center.
Economic terrorism by... blocking roads...
O.G. terrorism:
selma-bridge.jpeg


While I find particular points coming from BLM to be questionable, there certainly are major and legitimate issues and grievances that have been brought up which have largely been buried until now. Your "economic terrorism" in the form of protests is a legitimate way of responding to that.
 
Funny if Pandora didn't support a LBGT agenda, leftist would be DEMANDING a boycott
Yeah, it's only leftists that demand boycotts. Oh wait, that's completely not the case. Everybody has the right to boycott whomever they want in response to political and social stances, that doesn't mean all greivances are equally legitimate.
 
Economic terrorism by... blocking roads...
O.G. terrorism:
selma-bridge.jpeg


While I find particular points coming from BLM to be questionable, there certainly are major and legitimate issues and grievances that have been brought up which have largely been buried until now. Your "economic terrorism" in the form of protests is a legitimate way of responding to that.




Block state highways and preventing emergency vehicles from attending to emergencies is a crime BTW....
 
Holding protests and being annoying whiny douches =/= terrorism.
Killing cops sort of does (pssst...Dallas wasn't the first time).
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...10-cops-shot-killed-black-lives-matter-goons/

Oh yeah, 21 officers were injured in St. Paul the other night, too. One had a concrete block dropped on his head.

Blocking traffic on a major bridge for 5 hours (which is not a legal protest) shuts downs commutation necessary to commerce. That is economic terrorism. It's no different than OWS. When you start doing that, then you have transcended into premeditated disruption of the public good, and that is a form of terrorism as well.
Prove that their leadership are planning murders, bombings, etc and people would have a point.
What "leaders"? That's precisely the problem with much of the movement. However, in Dallas, this was the guy who led the protest that got shot up.

Sure:
http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016...end-behind-dallas-black-lives-matter-protest/

Rev.-Dr.-J3eff-Hood-640x600.jpg


All over the web #BLM activists are cheering the murder of the officers calling it "appropriate" and "just" and screeching that white America shouldn't be surprised that when someone like Castile is killed that they fire back (that cop was Latino, but oh well). They make no secret of their gleeful desire to see white people murdered-- even if they are themselves white, FFS.
Simply saying inflammatory things doesn't make them terrorists.
Then why is Pamela Geller's group on that registry?
 
Last edited:
Economic terrorism by... blocking roads...
O.G. terrorism:
selma-bridge.jpeg


While I find particular points coming from BLM to be questionable, there certainly are major and legitimate issues and grievances that have been brought up which have largely been buried until now. Your "economic terrorism" in the form of protests is a legitimate way of responding to that.


More like:


IRA-gunmen.jpg



04-ira_1364644a.jpg



The Weathermen is the closest the US has gotten to an actual terrorist organization post the Civil Rights era. Not sure if it's a good or bad sign that blocking a fucking road is considered terrorism by so many people.
 
While I disapprove of them not mentioning the officers at all, I enjoy using Pandora. I won't delete it.
 
More like:


IRA-gunmen.jpg



04-ira_1364644a.jpg



The Weathermen is the closest the US has gotten to an actual terrorist organization post the Civil Rights era. Not sure if it's a good or bad sign that blocking a fucking road is considered terrorism by so many people.

It's a good thing. It shows just how far from real terrorism our lives are. I find the idea that BLM is a terrorist organization laughable. I don't even consider the KKK a terrorist organization and they actually believed in terrorizing their opposition.
 
It's a good thing. It shows just how far from real terrorism our lives are. I find the idea that BLM is a terrorist organization laughable. I don't even consider the KKK a terrorist organization and they actually believed in terrorizing their opposition.
The problem seems to be that you don't live in perpetual fear.
You should work on that and then you'll recognize BLM for the terrorists they are.
 
Not sure if it's a good or bad sign that blocking a fucking road is considered terrorism by so many people.
It's good in that, as pan mentioned, we're really far from real terrorism affecting our lives. It's bad in that it excuses marginalization and excessive responses.
 
It's good in that, as pan mentioned, we're really far from real terrorism affecting our lives. It's bad in that it excuses marginalization and excessive responses.


Yes because throwing rocks and molotov cocktails at police, shooting up departments, dropping cinderblocks on peoples heads, and inspiring people who kill and wound 12 officers isn't REAL terrorism. BTW how many people called the planned parenthood shooter a terrorist?
 
It's a good thing. It shows just how far from real terrorism our lives are. I find the idea that BLM is a terrorist organization laughable. I don't even consider the KKK a terrorist organization and they actually believed in terrorizing their opposition.

The KKK used violence on their opposition for political purposes (keeping blacks in their place) so they were certainly a terrorist organization. Their organization specifically engaged in these actions as well. BLM does none of these things.

And yeah, it's a good sign of our security, and a bad sign of our historical knowledge and insularity.
 
The KKK used violence on their opposition for political purposes (keeping blacks in their place) so they were certainly a terrorist organization. Their organization specifically engaged in these actions as well. BLM does none of these things.

And yeah, it's a good sign of our security, and a bad sign of our historical knowledge and insularity.


And you don't think people in our government is using BLM for political purposes, who do you think is giving them the money to platform? The paper trail alone tells you something is dirty here. And politicians on the left is definitely using BLM to push their political agendas.
 
I'm not reading this thread, but FUCK NO to the OP, my E-40 station is such a finely cultivated selection of thumbs ups and thumbs downs... There's no way I'm giving that up.
 
The KKK used violence on their opposition for political purposes (keeping blacks in their place) so they were certainly a terrorist organization. Their organization specifically engaged in these actions as well. BLM does none of these things.

And yeah, it's a good sign of our security, and a bad sign of our historical knowledge and insularity.

Agreed, which is why I find the idea of BLM a terrorist organization so absurd. An organization that frustrates many? Sure. One that chooses a high profile method of advancing it's cause? Absolutely. But terrorists?

CJW's keep screaming about undermining the word "racist", well this would be undermining the word "terrorist".

My first use of "CJW". It's very good. Short but conveys meaning with just the right amount of mockery. I give it a 4 out of 5.
 
Killing cops sort of does (pssst...Dallas wasn't the first time).
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...10-cops-shot-killed-black-lives-matter-goons/

Oh yeah, 21 officers were injured in St. Paul the other night, too. One had a concrete block dropped on his head.

Blocking traffic on a major bridge for 5 hours (which is not a legal protest) shuts downs commutation necessary to commerce. That is economic terrorism. It's no different than OWS. When you start doing that, then you have transcended into premeditated disruption of the public good, and that is a form of terrorism as well.

What "leaders"? That's precisely the problem with much of the movement. However, in Dallas, this was the guy who led the protest that got shot up.

Sure:
http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016...end-behind-dallas-black-lives-matter-protest/

Rev.-Dr.-J3eff-Hood-640x600.jpg


All over the web #BLM activists are cheering the murder of the officers calling it "appropriate" and "just" and screeching that white America shouldn't be surprised that when someone like Castile is killed that they fire back (that cop was Latino, but oh well). They make no secret of their gleeful desire to see white people murdered-- even if they are themselves white, FFS.

Then why is Pamela Geller's group on that registry?

Anyone that gets on twitter and says they're BLM is, even if they're not involved with the group and they don't do anything but throw out hashtags.


That IS sort of the problem. If someone else that says they're a democrat or says they're a christian murders someone, does that make those terrorist groups? How about when a cop uses excessive force, are all cops terrorists now?


Most people would say no. This is part of a broader issue of separating the behavior of individuals from that of groups.
 
It's good in that, as pan mentioned, we're really far from real terrorism affecting our lives. It's bad in that it excuses marginalization and excessive responses.
Marginalization of #BLM is absolutely the first step we need towards mitigating police vs. civilian violence (and vice versa). #BLM is a hate group that only wants to hold one party responsible without acknowledging the massive, acute, and distinctive problems with the other.




We need to let men like Milwaukee Sheriff David Clarke and Milwaukee Police Chief Edward Flynn take the lead on solving issues like this, but we lack the political will because so many are brainwashed in CRT. They don't agree on everything; most significantly the stand apart on the 2nd Amendment. Between them lies the fertile ground.

Their mayor is an asshat who just gets in the way. That's what happens when politicians with an agenda who feed off a specific demographic get in the mix.
 
Back
Top