I would agree that the bolded points favor grapplers. I feel like the underlined points tend to or arguably benefit strikers just as much if not more. As to what's left:
Open gloves do not necessarily benefit strikers (although for some things such as trapping and people not being able to cover up they do) however to not have open gloves would essentially nerf grappling altogether. Vaseline is the same, MMA started and should at least mimic a street fight, I don't have stats but i'm guessing most fights don't have competitors covered in some sort of lube.
Limited ground time is also pretty silly for mma, so you're gonna stand people up mid RNC?
The starred point, also does slightly help strikers too. I believe the rule was implemented to stop wrestlers wall and stalling by grabbing the cage and having a near unbreakable clinch.
Edit: this thread is pretty silly, also TS implying wrestlers are only dominant because of attributes such as strength is pretty offensive towards grapplers too.
Why is the thread silly? I put forward a very logical argument as to why wrestlers are more likely to win. You are welcome to refute it. Which of my points do you wish to dispute? The part about grapplers is true, since their specialization is on the grund, but you have to get there first... And wrestlers are superior at that.