- Joined
- Jul 2, 2013
- Messages
- 31,779
- Reaction score
- 27,666
I'm sorry, but this is just ridiculous reasoning. Your argument is basically that it's necessary to give the conservative MINORITY an advantage over the liberal MAJORITY because if the liberal majority had their votes count, that would somehow be tyranny or something. And you claim if we count the majority of votes instead of the EC, the union ceases to exist, but somehow it works out in every other country that counts popular vote.I think you underestimate the level of difference between states such as NY/NJ/CA/WA/OR and say, MS/AK/AL, etc.
The greater the disparity in political execution, the more important the EC is for continuity.
Just like countries can leave the EU, without the EC, states would and could leave the Union, if politics stayed as is.
They're less populated and have different ideologies, histories and needs than states like CA/NY/NJ/IL etc.
Not having a say in politics is a sure way of causing civil disengagement
By the way, you're from California and appear to be conservative. If anything, your vote counts for nothing in our current system which counts EVERY vote from California as blue. If we did it by popular vote, then your vote would count for whoever you voted for, along with EVERY other vote nationwide. But under our current system, blue votes in red states don't count, and vice versa. That's bullshit and should change. It's a shame that it won't.


