Why did Hitler not massacre the 400 thousand allied soldiers stuck at Dunkirk?

arathans said:
No idea and no can ever give you a solid answer but at that time, afaik, he still respected the empire so i can only allude to the idea that it wasnt in his intereast to continue fighting the english as he had offered peace terms only a few months before, maybe he really was hopeful not to have to continue the war on the allied front.
Click to expand...
the idea that he didn't do it because the two people's were cousins sounds nice and all but we're all pretty much cousins and that has never stopped us from demonizing and killing each other.
 
He didn't really think of the French and the British as inferior in the same way they thought of Jews and the Slavs in the east
 
He didn't view them as his enemy. Also knew how slandered he was in the international press for daring to kick central banking money printing at interest scam out of his country. He thought this would show the world not to trust the media and view him in a different light. He underestimated mass media's mind control abilities.
 
mozfonky said:
that's what I've heard too, and also, there was one of our military leaders, may have been Patton who said that WW1 would end up in another one with how things were handled. From what I hear, the humiliation and degradation as well as the impossiblity of making them pay money they didn't have created the situation.
Click to expand...

They had to eat their dogs to survive after WW1, if someone made me eat my dog, I'm voting for the guy saying pay back is due...... It's really that simple....
 
mozfonky said:
I'm no military leader or genius but even I can see that a population as small as Germany and Japan cannot rule an entire globe. Hitler's plan was world domination with that tiny population, it's retarded.
Click to expand...

The English had done it, with sea power...... I don't think Hitler saw world domination.

Hitler wanted land for his people to grow......
 
He for some reason had this grest respect for England or at least the Xrown and I have read equally wanted to "persuade" them to join him.. He didn't want to destroy England initially he wanted England to be like Italy .

I guess that had to do with him not just blowing up all the ships an the men on beach trying to get out. They indeed were sitting ducks.
 
Takes Two To Tango said:
I never saw the film Dunkirk by Nolan, but i was watching my favorite documentary on WWII and it made me wonder why Hitler held back in mowing these soldiers down. They were sitting ducks.

I believe it's one of his biggest mistakes in the war among other things he did wrong.

Why do you think he spared them?

Here's a timestamp of this event on the documentary.

Check it out.

Click it on the YouTube link in one of these two videos.



Click to expand...

Because the French were keeping them busy while the Brits evacuated. Look it up. It doesn‘t fit the Walmatt narrative that French are pussies but it‘s a fact.
 
Mr.Maelstrom said:
He was half cocked on meth 24/7, so anytime he wasn't busy screaming at crowds or goose stepping in front of the mirror was probably painfully bland.
Like, if you caught him on a regular Tuesday morning, hair not combed in his bathrobe, he would probably go on and on about being vegan, or how he wanted to get back into painting full time once all this blitzkrieg work stuff calmed down, and you'd likely leave feeling a bit unimpressed.
Click to expand...


Going to work on nazi meth was probably awesome. Hitler probably slept like every 3 days and other than when he woke up he probably really was cranked up 24/7. I can't recall but I think they were blasting him with like morphine or something too.

Feel like I'd get a lot done if I had hitlers medical staff to wait on me ya know.
 
heard he felt kinship with the english as both being of same blood. heard he still thought it was possible to potentially ally with the english.

wish i remember where, maybe will come to me later.
 
mozfonky said:
if that's true, odd. No one was sparing them when they were down. The soviets particularly were said to have raped everything from 8-80 when germany fell. Probably our guys and the brits did things similar but I hadn't heard.
Click to expand...
Nazis rarely spared anyone especially the Soviets. Millions were killed as they rampaged their way across the eastern front. They would come across a town, and if they were in a hurry they would just flatten it with their tanks with the people still in it, otherwise they would take their time and do things like rape and butcher the women and girls in the street with their bayonets and dump everyone in a mass grave. No surprise when the Soviets paid it back and then some.
 
tgv976 said:
He didn't view them as his enemy. Also knew how slandered he was in the international press for daring to kick central banking money printing at interest scam out of his country. He thought this would show the world not to trust the media and view him in a different light. He underestimated mass media's mind control abilities.
Click to expand...
Oh goodie, another sherfront Nazi apologist.
William Huggins said:
They had to eat their dogs to survive after WW1, if someone made me eat my dog, I'm voting for the guy saying pay back is due...... It's really that simple....
Click to expand...
It'd be real strange to blame other countries for the Great Depression and your government frivolously spending on military spending and corruption instead of helping out citizens.
 
From what i've read Hitler was all to often his own worst enemy when it came to the military. Thankfully the Germany army made a great many mistakes.
 
Takes Two To Tango said:
I find it weird a guy who gave orders to the final solution and ruthless killing of millions of Jews in a brutal way, would all of a sudden have mercy for these soldiers. Doesn't match up with this MO, his character.

The guy just simply had a brain fart and fucked up and that probably one of the major factors that cost him of winning the war and also invading a vast country like Soviet Union/Russia. There is no way you can occupy it even if you won.
Click to expand...

The answer is simple. That wasn't Hitlers MO. He didn't actual give orders to murder millions of Jews and had no intention or desire to slaughter the British and French.
 
OneOfOne said:
The answer is simple. That wasn't Hitlers MO. He didn't actual give orders to murder millions of Jews and had no intention or desire to slaughter the British and French.
Click to expand...

Oh ok, thanks.
 
William Huggins said:
The English had done it, with sea power...... I don't think Hitler saw world domination.

Hitler wanted land for his people to grow......
Click to expand...
he wanted an ethnically pure Europe of one white race. he believed the English would have joined him.

friendly reminder to holocost deniers that achieving that ideal would be difficult without an intent to kill a lot of people
 
Takes Two To Tango said:
I find it weird a guy who gave orders to the final solution and ruthless killing of millions of Jews in a brutal way, would all of a sudden have mercy for these soldiers. Doesn't match up with this MO, his character.

The guy just simply had a brain fart and fucked up and that probably one of the major factors that cost him of winning the war and also invading a vast country like Soviet Union/Russia. There is no way you can occupy it even if you won.
Click to expand...
The Holocaust is taught to us in school as a top down phenomenon but the evidence points more towards the functionalist view that it was ordered by SS camp wardens at particular sites, all of which were in Poland. All the horror stories come from Auschwitz as the female warden who ran it was especially brutal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,264,156
Messages
57,268,803
Members
175,613
Latest member
ThunderMMA

Share this page

Back
Top