Which GOAT win was the best between these 2?

Whos win was better?


  • Total voters
    333
Dude you didn’t even asked the question in an unbiased way, and you’re complaining that people are biased.

Silva destroyed and finished Okami.

GSP dominated Fitch and won a decision.

There is no comparison; Silva’s win is better.
You literally just compared them.
 
Admittedly a bigger GSP fan than Silva, so take my opinion with a grain of salt.
GSP's win was better:

*Fitch was clearly the number 2 in the division for years and continued to be so after his loss because nobody until Hendricks could beat him.

*Tied A. Silva for the longest win streak in the promotion at that time leading up to the title fight.

*Despite being the clear #2 in the division, Dana wouldn't give him a second shot at the belt because the loss was so one-sided he wanted Fitch to show he could do something different to convince him it wouldn't just be another one-sided beatdown.

*Always respected Okami, but he received his title shot after other options were exhausted, not because they viewed Okami as a threat, the exact opposite, and they assumed it would be boring.
 
Admittedly a bigger GSP fan than Silva, so take my opinion with a grain of salt.
GSP's win was better:

*Fitch was clearly the number 2 in the division for years and continued to be so after his loss because nobody until Hendricks could beat him.

*Tied A. Silva for the longest win streak in the promotion at that time leading up to the title fight.

*Despite being the clear #2 in the division, Dana wouldn't give him a second shot at the belt because the loss was so one-sided he wanted Fitch to show he could do something different to convince him it wouldn't just be another one-sided beatdown.

*Always respected Okami, but he received his title shot after other options were exhausted, not because they viewed Okami as a threat, the exact opposite, and they assumed it would be boring.

  • Fitch wasn't #2 when he faced GSP. He had just entered the top 10 for the first time in his career less than a year beforehand. His only fight in between was against an unranked UFC newcomer.
  • He had only one ranked win during this win streak; Diego Sanchez
  • He wasn't even #2 until he beat Alves the second time, 2 years after he fought GSP
  • Okami beat #3 Nate Marquardt to earn his shot, after previously beating top 5 former champ Evan Tanner. He actually earned his shot twice, with top 5 wins, but had to pull out of the first one due to injury.
 
Last edited:
I
  • Fitch wasn't #2 when he faced GSP, and only entered the top 10 for the first time in his career less than a year beforehand. His only fight in between was against an unranked UFC newcomer.
  • He had only one ranked win during this win streak; Diego Sanchez
  • He wasn't even #2 until he beat Alves the second time, 2 years after he fought GSP
  • Okami beat #3 Nate Marquardt to earn his shot, after previously beating top 5 former champ Evan Tanner. He actually earned his shot twice, with top 5 wins, but had to pull out of the first one due to injury.
I stand corrected, Fitch was not #2 the entire stretch, he was top 5 from July '06 to Oct '11. Okami was never #2, and struggled to maintain his top 10 ranking in what was always considered a shallower division due to rarely getting anything more than a 3 fight win streak.
 
GSP over Fitch easily. No offense to Okami, but Fitch was a major force for many, many years. He won something like 15 or 16 fights ina row before GSP thoroughly dominated him, and then won another five in a row.

And hell, Fitch beat Okami.
Penn (a guy who makes 145) fought Fitch to a draw. This has nothing to do with the thread, I know. Just thought I’d mention how game BJ was.
 
I

I stand corrected, Fitch was not #2 the entire stretch, he was top 5 from July '06 to Oct '11. Okami was never #2, and struggled to maintain his top 10 ranking in what was always considered a shallower division due to rarely getting anything more than a 3 fight win streak.

You know.....it's funny how some of you will still spew bullshit even though these things have already been discussed in this very thread, and even though you're just dead wrong:


Okami's standing according to official Sherdog rankings:

2008 - https://www.sherdog.com/news/rankings/4/Sherdog-Official-Mixed-Martial-Arts-Rankings-15631 - Okami #4

2009 - https://www.sherdog.com/news/rankings/4/Sherdog-Official-Mixed-Martial-Arts-Rankings-17131 - Okami #2

2010 - https://www.sherdog.com/news/rankings/4/Sherdog-Official-Mixed-Martial-Arts-Rankings-28893 - Okami #3

2011 - https://www.sherdog.com/news/rankings/4/Sherdog-Official-Mixed-Martial-Arts-Rankings-33703 - Okami #3

2012 - https://www.sherdog.com/news/rankings/4/Sherdogs-Official-Mixed-Martial-Arts-Rankings-40091 - Okami #3

2013 - https://www.sherdog.com/news/rankings/4/Sherdogs-Official-Mixed-Martial-Arts-Rankings-52775 - Okami #4


This is Okami maintaining a top 5 ranking (including the #2 you claimed he never attained) from 2008-2013. You claimed he struggled to maintain top 10? Weird, isn't it? This stretch covers from the time he beat top 5 former champ Evan Tanner, to when he lost to Jacare in 2013. He actually first entered the top 10 a year prior, in 2007, after beating Swick, so he maintained his top 10 ranking for at least 6 years. 5 years straight of top 5. Wow, oh em gee! Is that very comparable to Fitch or wut, homie? You know the biggest difference? Okami actually consistently fought top contenders. Fitch didn't. I covered that shit earlier in the thread too:


Stats going into their title fights:

Fitch: 19-2-1 (86.36% win rate) with 11 finishes (57.89% finish rate in 19 victories) over 6 years with 1 top 10 win.
Okami: 27-5 (84.38% win rate) with 14 finishes (51.85% finish rate in 27 victories) over 9 years with 4 top 10 wins.


Now, given that Okami had 10 more fights than Fitch did at this time, the numbers aren't quite as accurate as they would be with equal sample sizes. So, let's take a look at where Okami was at 22 fights into his career:

Both fighters 22 fights into their careers:

Fitch was 19-2-1 (86.36% win rate) with 11 finishes (57.89% finish rate in 19 victories) over 6 years with 1 top 10 win.
Okami was 19-3 (86.36% win rate) with 11 finishes (57.89% finish rate in 19 victories) over 4 years with 1 top 10 win.


Would you look at that? Weird, isn't it.

-This is where Fitch was at when he fought GSP
-Okami had already matched what Fitch had done ("virtually identical!") and had 10 more fights before he fought Silva
-Okami would go 8-2 over his next 10 fights, adding 3 top 10 wins (Tanner, Swick, and Marquardt), only losing to top 5 former champ Rich Franklin and future 2 time contender Chael Sonnen


Let's see how Fitch did over his next 10 fights, and where he was at 32 fights into his career:

At 32 fights into their careers:

Okami: 27-5 (84.38% win rate) with 14 finishes (51.85% finish rate) - 3-1 in his last 4 fights - with 4 top 10 wins
Fitch: 25-6-1 (78.12% win rate) with 11 finishes (44% finish rate) - 1-3 in his last 4 fights - with 3 top 10 wins


Fun facts:

- Fitch went 6-4-1 in his next 11 fights over 5 years compared to Okami's 8-2
- Fitch didn't get one single finish in 5 years/11 fights - lowering his finish rate by over 13%.
- Fitch (while being the consensus #2 for 3.5 years) only added 6 more total wins to his resume in 5 years/11 fights - lowering his win rate by over 8%.

- Fitch (while being the consensus #2 for 3.5 years) only added 2 more top 10 wins to his resume in 5 years/11 fights - still less than what Okami had when he fought Silva.
- This is where Okami was at when he fought Silva for the title.
- This is where Fitch was at 5 years after facing GSP, after holding the #2 spot in the "most stacked division" for 42 months.

Fitch is 3-3-1 in ranked fights throughout his UFC career. That includes Penn and Paulo Thiago.

Which division was more shallow? The one where the guy had to earn his shot twice, and more consistently faced top competition, or the one where they gave out and maintained favorable rankings and the dude only fought ranked guys 6 out of 18 fights? So, please tell me how Fitch was so much better. What the fuck did he do? The win streak!? Meatloaf?
 
Last edited:
hard to say. fitch was a top 3-5 ww of all time but i feel okami is the better fighter. i guess fitch based on rankings. he was the proven number 1 contender
 
hard to say. fitch was a top 3-5 ww of all time but i feel okami is the better fighter. i guess fitch based on rankings. he was the proven number 1 contender

Fitch had only 1 top 10 win to Okami's 4. Okami earned his title shot twice with top 5 wins. Fitch beat an unranked UFC newcomer prior to his title shot, Okami beat #3 Nate Marquardt prior to his. They were both #3, yet Okami was more proven.

What exactly did Fitch do to be the proven #1 contender, and how was he more proven than Okami at the time of their title shots?

How is decisioning Fitch "better" than finishing Okami?
 
Penn (a guy who makes 145) fought Fitch to a draw. This has nothing to do with the thread, I know. Just thought I’d mention how game BJ was.
Yeah. The collapse of Penn as a fighter is one of the great tragedies of MMA.
 
You know.....it's funny how some of you will still spew bullshit even though these things have already been discussed in this very thread, and even though you're just dead wrong:


Okami's standing according to official Sherdog rankings:

2008 - https://www.sherdog.com/news/rankings/4/Sherdog-Official-Mixed-Martial-Arts-Rankings-15631 - Okami #4

2009 - https://www.sherdog.com/news/rankings/4/Sherdog-Official-Mixed-Martial-Arts-Rankings-17131 - Okami #2

2010 - https://www.sherdog.com/news/rankings/4/Sherdog-Official-Mixed-Martial-Arts-Rankings-28893 - Okami #3

2011 - https://www.sherdog.com/news/rankings/4/Sherdog-Official-Mixed-Martial-Arts-Rankings-33703 - Okami #3

2012 - https://www.sherdog.com/news/rankings/4/Sherdogs-Official-Mixed-Martial-Arts-Rankings-40091 - Okami #3

2013 - https://www.sherdog.com/news/rankings/4/Sherdogs-Official-Mixed-Martial-Arts-Rankings-52775 - Okami #4


This is Okami maintaining a top 5 ranking (including the #2 you claimed he never attained) from 2008-2013. You claimed he struggled to maintain top 10? Weird, isn't it? This stretch covers from the time he beat top 5 former champ Evan Tanner, to when he lost to Jacare in 2013. He actually first entered the top 10 a year prior, in 2007, after beating Swick, so he maintained his top 10 ranking for at least 6 years. 5 years straight of top 5. Wow, oh em gee! Is that very comparable to Fitch or wut, homie? You know the biggest difference? Okami actually consistently fought top contenders. Fitch didn't. I covered that shit earlier in the thread too:


Stats going into their title fights:

Fitch: 19-2-1 (86.36% win rate) with 11 finishes (57.89% finish rate in 19 victories) over 6 years with 1 top 10 win.
Okami: 27-5 (84.38% win rate) with 14 finishes (51.85% finish rate in 27 victories) over 9 years with 4 top 10 wins.


Now, given that Okami had 10 more fights than Fitch did at this time, the numbers aren't quite as accurate as they would be with equal sample sizes. So, let's take a look at where Okami was at 22 fights into his career:

Both fighters 22 fights into their careers:

Fitch was 19-2-1 (86.36% win rate) with 11 finishes (57.89% finish rate in 19 victories) over 6 years with 1 top 10 win.
Okami was 19-3 (86.36% win rate) with 11 finishes (57.89% finish rate in 19 victories) over 4 years with 1 top 10 win.


Would you look at that? Weird, isn't it.

-This is where Fitch was at when he fought GSP
-Okami had already matched what Fitch had done ("virtually identical!") and had 10 more fights before he fought Silva
-Okami would go 8-2 over his next 10 fights, adding 3 top 10 wins (Tanner, Swick, and Marquardt), only losing to top 5 former champ Rich Franklin and future 2 time contender Chael Sonnen


Let's see how Fitch did over his next 10 fights, and where he was at 32 fights into his career:

At 32 fights into their careers:

Okami: 27-5 (84.38% win rate) with 14 finishes (51.85% finish rate) - 3-1 in his last 4 fights - with 4 top 10 wins
Fitch: 25-6-1 (78.12% win rate) with 11 finishes (44% finish rate) - 1-3 in his last 4 fights - with 3 top 10 wins


Fun facts:

- Fitch went 6-4-1 in his next 11 fights over 5 years compared to Okami's 8-2
- Fitch didn't get one single finish in 5 years/11 fights - lowering his finish rate by over 13%.
- Fitch (while being the consensus #2 for 3.5 years) only added 6 more total wins to his resume in 5 years/11 fights - lowering his win rate by over 8%.

- Fitch (while being the consensus #2 for 3.5 years) only added 2 more top 10 wins to his resume in 5 years/11 fights - still less than what Okami had when he fought Silva.
- This is where Okami was at when he fought Silva for the title.
- This is where Fitch was at 5 years after facing GSP, after holding the #2 spot in the "most stacked division" for 42 months.

Fitch is 3-3-1 in ranked fights throughout his UFC career. That includes Penn and Paulo Thiago.

Which division was more shallow? The one where the guy had to earn his shot twice, and more consistently faced top competition, or the one where they gave out and maintained favorable rankings and the dude only fought ranked guys 6 out of 18 fights? So, please tell me how Fitch was so much better. What the fuck did he do? The win streak!? Meatloaf?
You went with Sherdog I went with Fightmetric, no need for me to "spew" b.s. It's right there on the internet.
 
IMO, Fitch was the better win.
 
You went with Sherdog I went with Fightmetric, no need for me to "spew" b.s. It's right there on the internet.

Fightmetric or fightmatrix? Show your work. Where's your research?

IMO, Fitch was the better win.

Why do you think that? Care to elaborate? Also, it's not which win was "better", it's which performance was "better". Still would like an elaboration.
 
Fightmetric or fightmatrix? Show your work. Where's your research?



Why do you think that? Care to elaborate? Also, it's not which win was "better", it's which performance was "better". Still would like an elaboration.

Ah, ok. I think Fitch was the better fighter just based on the fact I think he would beat more top WWs at the time of around his title run. If we take Fitch vs all the top 10 guys from 2006 to 2012 and take Okami vs the MW's, I think Fitch beats more top guys. And he also beat Okami. Fitch actually continued to win in Bellator as well. But both top wins and very impressive.

Now in regards to the actual question? Anderson Silva's performance was better. He finished him inside 2 rounds. Both first rounds were dominant from GSP and Anderson, but Anderson finished shortly after while GSP went to a decision. While the fight was completely one sided from GSP, he couldn't finish, and he really went for it and tried. It was impressive cause Okami had only been finished once in 33 fights and Anderson did it with ease.
 
You know.....it's funny how some of you will still spew bullshit even though these things have already been discussed in this very thread, and even though you're just dead wrong:


Okami's standing according to official Sherdog rankings:

2008 - https://www.sherdog.com/news/rankings/4/Sherdog-Official-Mixed-Martial-Arts-Rankings-15631 - Okami #4

2009 - https://www.sherdog.com/news/rankings/4/Sherdog-Official-Mixed-Martial-Arts-Rankings-17131 - Okami #2

2010 - https://www.sherdog.com/news/rankings/4/Sherdog-Official-Mixed-Martial-Arts-Rankings-28893 - Okami #3

2011 - https://www.sherdog.com/news/rankings/4/Sherdog-Official-Mixed-Martial-Arts-Rankings-33703 - Okami #3

2012 - https://www.sherdog.com/news/rankings/4/Sherdogs-Official-Mixed-Martial-Arts-Rankings-40091 - Okami #3

2013 - https://www.sherdog.com/news/rankings/4/Sherdogs-Official-Mixed-Martial-Arts-Rankings-52775 - Okami #4


This is Okami maintaining a top 5 ranking (including the #2 you claimed he never attained) from 2008-2013. You claimed he struggled to maintain top 10? Weird, isn't it? This stretch covers from the time he beat top 5 former champ Evan Tanner, to when he lost to Jacare in 2013. He actually first entered the top 10 a year prior, in 2007, after beating Swick, so he maintained his top 10 ranking for at least 6 years. 5 years straight of top 5. Wow, oh em gee! Is that very comparable to Fitch or wut, homie? You know the biggest difference? Okami actually consistently fought top contenders. Fitch didn't. I covered that shit earlier in the thread too:


Stats going into their title fights:

Fitch: 19-2-1 (86.36% win rate) with 11 finishes (57.89% finish rate in 19 victories) over 6 years with 1 top 10 win.
Okami: 27-5 (84.38% win rate) with 14 finishes (51.85% finish rate in 27 victories) over 9 years with 4 top 10 wins.


Now, given that Okami had 10 more fights than Fitch did at this time, the numbers aren't quite as accurate as they would be with equal sample sizes. So, let's take a look at where Okami was at 22 fights into his career:

Both fighters 22 fights into their careers:

Fitch was 19-2-1 (86.36% win rate) with 11 finishes (57.89% finish rate in 19 victories) over 6 years with 1 top 10 win.
Okami was 19-3 (86.36% win rate) with 11 finishes (57.89% finish rate in 19 victories) over 4 years with 1 top 10 win.


Would you look at that? Weird, isn't it.

-This is where Fitch was at when he fought GSP
-Okami had already matched what Fitch had done ("virtually identical!") and had 10 more fights before he fought Silva
-Okami would go 8-2 over his next 10 fights, adding 3 top 10 wins (Tanner, Swick, and Marquardt), only losing to top 5 former champ Rich Franklin and future 2 time contender Chael Sonnen


Let's see how Fitch did over his next 10 fights, and where he was at 32 fights into his career:

At 32 fights into their careers:

Okami: 27-5 (84.38% win rate) with 14 finishes (51.85% finish rate) - 3-1 in his last 4 fights - with 4 top 10 wins
Fitch: 25-6-1 (78.12% win rate) with 11 finishes (44% finish rate) - 1-3 in his last 4 fights - with 3 top 10 wins


Fun facts:

- Fitch went 6-4-1 in his next 11 fights over 5 years compared to Okami's 8-2
- Fitch didn't get one single finish in 5 years/11 fights - lowering his finish rate by over 13%.
- Fitch (while being the consensus #2 for 3.5 years) only added 6 more total wins to his resume in 5 years/11 fights - lowering his win rate by over 8%.

- Fitch (while being the consensus #2 for 3.5 years) only added 2 more top 10 wins to his resume in 5 years/11 fights - still less than what Okami had when he fought Silva.
- This is where Okami was at when he fought Silva for the title.
- This is where Fitch was at 5 years after facing GSP, after holding the #2 spot in the "most stacked division" for 42 months.

Fitch is 3-3-1 in ranked fights throughout his UFC career. That includes Penn and Paulo Thiago.

Which division was more shallow? The one where the guy had to earn his shot twice, and more consistently faced top competition, or the one where they gave out and maintained favorable rankings and the dude only fought ranked guys 6 out of 18 fights? So, please tell me how Fitch was so much better. What the fuck did he do? The win streak!? Meatloaf?



This post was fucking masterful, and should end the debate (even though it won't).

I'd love to see the Fitch defenders take on the substance of the facts you laid out head on. That 16 fight win streak certainly doesn't stand up under scrutiny as an argument against Okami.
 
Ah, ok. I think Fitch was the better fighter just based on the fact I think he would beat more top WWs at the time of around his title run. If we take Fitch vs all the top 10 guys from 2006 to 2012 and take Okami vs the MW's, I think Fitch beats more top guys. And he also beat Okami. Fitch actually continued to win in Bellator as well. But both top wins and very impressive.

Now in regards to the actual question? Anderson Silva's performance was better. He finished him inside 2 rounds. Both first rounds were dominant from GSP and Anderson, but Anderson finished shortly after while GSP went to a decision. While the fight was completely one sided from GSP, he couldn't finish, and he really went for it and tried. It was impressive cause Okami had only been finished once in 33 fights and Anderson did it with ease.

Fitch only beat one top 10 guy though, and Okami had beaten 4. Okami proved it because he actually did beat more top guys than Fitch. Does that make sense? It's not speculation. It's objective fact. I agree 100% with the second part of your post, and that's actually the question at hand here. The TS was being intentionally misleading, and obviously trying to sway the poll in his/GSP's favor. The thread title and topic should read "Which was the better performance?" That's the argument he had with @pankrat. He said that Fitch was such a higher quality opponent that decisioning him was a better performance than Silva finishing Okami. Despite the fact that we all know finishes > decisions in almost every case, we decided to look into it further and find out why Fitch was so much better. Turns out he wasn't. They're very comparable, but Okami is actually the higher quality opponent. Not by a landslide, but enough to shut down any insinuation that decisioning Fitch was somehow more meaningful. Cheers.
 
Fightmetric or fightmatrix? Show your work. Where's your research?
fightmatrix, thank you.
Jon Fitch
US.png
Jon Fitch's profile at Sherdog
l.PNG

Jon Fitch's profile at Tapology
l.PNG


Association: American Kickboxing Academy
Pro Debut Date: 2002-07-13
Pro Record: 32-8-2
Win Finish %: 37.5%
Quality Perf. %: 71.4%
Last Ranked: 7/01/2020

#15 Welterweight

Highest Quarterly Ranking: 10/01/2010
#2 Welterweight

All-Time Rank:
#11 Welterweight

Last Loss Date: 9/12/2020
Last Loss: [#31 WW] Neiman Gracie
Opponent's Last 5: W L W L W
UFC Record: 14-3-1
Octagon Time: 3:58:58
Title Bouts: 0-1-0
Longest Win Streak: 8 (2005-2008)
Next Best Win Streak: 5 (2009-2010)
UFC Debut: 2005-10-03
Last UFC Fight: 2013-02-02


Quarterly Generated Historical Rankings
Rating bar represents the fighter's standing relative to the top of the division at the time

Date ↑ ↓ Rank Record Points
07/01/2020 2 #15 Welterweight 32-7-2
496
04/01/2020 #13 Welterweight 32-7-2
556
01/01/2020 2 #13 Welterweight 32-7-2
556
10/01/2019 #15 Welterweight 32-7-2
556
07/01/2019 1 #15 Welterweight 32-7-2
556
04/01/2019 4 #16 Welterweight 32-7-1
525
01/01/2019 1 #12 Welterweight 32-7-1
525
10/01/2018 1 #13 Welterweight 32-7-1
525
07/01/2018 3 #12 Welterweight 32-7-1
525
04/01/2018 #15 Welterweight 31-7-1
414
01/01/2018 #15 Welterweight 31-7-1
414
10/01/2017 1 #15 Welterweight 31-7-1
414
07/01/2017 2 #14 Welterweight 31-7-1
414
04/01/2017 2 #16 Welterweight 30-7-1
377
01/01/2017 5 #14 Welterweight 30-7-1
377
10/01/2016 1 #19 Welterweight 29-7-1
307
07/01/2016 1 #20 Welterweight 29-7-1
307
04/01/2016 1 #19 Welterweight 28-7-1
305
01/01/2016 9 #18 Welterweight 28-7-1
305
10/01/2015 1 #27 Welterweight 27-7-1
214
07/01/2015 2 #26 Welterweight 27-7-1
220
04/01/2015 #24 Welterweight 27-7-1
220
01/01/2015 4 #24 Welterweight 27-7-1
220
10/01/2014 #20 Welterweight 27-6-1
262
07/01/2014 2 #20 Welterweight 26-6-1
223
04/01/2014 2 #22 Welterweight 26-6-1
223
01/01/2014 2 #24 Welterweight 26-6-1
223
10/01/2013 1 #22 Welterweight 25-6-1
224
07/01/2013 9 #23 Welterweight 25-6-1
224
04/01/2013 3 #14 Welterweight 25-5-1
270
01/01/2013 1 #11 Welterweight 25-4-1
316
10/01/2012 #12 Welterweight 24-4-1
282
07/01/2012 2 #12 Welterweight 24-4-1
289
04/01/2012 1 #10 Welterweight 24-4-1
296
01/01/2012 6 #9 Welterweight 24-4-1
300
10/01/2011 #3 Welterweight 24-3-1
422
07/01/2011 #3 Welterweight 24-3-1
422
04/01/2011 #3 Welterweight 24-3-1
422
01/01/2011 1 #3 Welterweight 24-3-0
432
10/01/2010 1 #2 Welterweight 24-3-0
432
07/01/2010 1 #3 Welterweight 23-3-0
348
04/01/2010 #2 Welterweight 23-3-0
348
01/01/2010 1 #2 Welterweight 22-3-0
339
10/01/2009 #3 Welterweight 21-3-0
325
07/01/2009 #3 Welterweight 20-3-0
273
04/01/2009 #3 Welterweight 20-3-0
338
01/01/2009 #3 Welterweight 19-3-0
306
10/01/2008 1 #3 Welterweight 19-3-0
306
07/01/2008 1 #2 Welterweight 19-2-0
313
04/01/2008 2 #3 Welterweight 19-2-0
246
01/01/2008 1 #5 Welterweight 18-2-0
218
10/01/2007 1 #4 Welterweight 18-2-0
218
07/01/2007 1 #5 Welterweight 17-2-0
202
04/01/2007 1 #4 Welterweight 16-2-0
194
01/01/2007 1 #5 Welterweight 15-2-0
169
10/01/2006 1 #6 Welterweight 14-2-0
159
07/01/2006 NR #5 Welterweight 14-2-0
159
04/01/2006 1 #31 Middleweight 12-2-0
75
01/01/2006 NR #30 Middleweight 12-2-0
75
10/01/2005 7 #29 Welterweight 11-2-0
58
07/01/2005 2 #22 Welterweight 10-2-0
61
04/01/2005 3 #20 Welterweight 10-2-0
61
01/01/2005 10 #23 Welterweight 10-2-0
61
10/01/2004 2 #33 Welterweight 7-2-0
46
07/01/2004 1 #31 Welterweight 6-2-0
45
04/01/2004 4 #30 Welterweight 6-2-0
45
01/01/2004 NR #26 Welterweight 6-2-0
45
10/01/2003 NR #73 Middleweight 5-2-0
29
10/01/2002 NR #108 Light Heavyweight 3-1-0
17
 
Back
Top