Fitch was clearly the #2 WW at the time and on a huge winning streak, including being undefeated in the UFC at that point. Although Okami was a legit contender it was basically process of elimination since Anderson was running through everyone at that point, except most was waiting for the Sonnen rematch. Caliber wise very similar, but on paper Fitch was the clear #2, whereas even if Okami won, there were many hypothetical matches he could have loss next.
I respect your opinion but that doesnt makes a "definitely" case for Fitch.
Correct me if im wrong, your point is basically that he was ranked #2 in his division, "clearly" (which I dont quite agree, but it's your stance)
Well, if you acknowledge that Fitch and Okami were similar caliber of opponent but there were other contenders of same or superior caliber at MW....that literally describes a more stacked division at the top and doesnt make Silva's performances any worse.
Okami had already gotten a tittle shot in 2008 btw, three years before, but missed by injury.
Fitch beat only one actual contender from that era (Alves), none other unanimously top5 ranked in the division; his other top10 ranked wins in his career are Diego and Paulo. Okami had more top ranked wins than Fitch, coming up to their tittle shot and in their whole UFC stint too.
Honestly, I dont think it justifies the claim that outclassing and finishing your opponent in a tittle fight is an inferior performance than taking it to the judges, as lopsided as it was. Much less "definitely"
>>
Fitch was probably seen as a more of a challenge for the champion at the time, but that's another story. It doesnt make Silva's win any worse. It refflect sthe superiority of Silva above his peers, especially at that point in time, coming off front kicking Belfort as opposed to GSP tapping to strikes to Matt Serra not that long ago.
To take away such credit from Silva in order to downplay his performance and competition is dishonest and unfair IMO