International When Grifters Wilfully Misunderstand Basic Censorship: Musk Edition

[LeonardoBjj]

All we're requesting they do is program grok so it refuses to make those kind of images.

- I use Leonardo Ai to do images of cars and houses. Tried to do one of Trump fghting with a crocodile, and the AI didnt let use real person

 

[freakroor]

It uses real photos as building blocks

yes, consentually-taken photos of clothed people.

quite preferable to the alternative.

 

[GreatSaintGuillotine]

yes, consentually-taken photos of clothed people.

quite preferable to the alternative.

But not consensually used to make child porn from an actual kid...

 

[Kardashians]

with all the porn available online you still have men taking women who dont participate in it and making fake nudes of them. its weirdo behavior. for the fellas bringing up photoshop, yes, that would also be weirdo behavior cutting and pasting a womans head onto a naked body. but this is a lot more accessible and easier for the every day person to use. you dont need a program, you dont need to have any knowledge of said program, you just type out some degenerate prompt (in public mind you) and reap the results. if you can't see a problem with this idk what to tell ya. its violating even if its not the womans real body. youre still having your image be manipulated in a way you never consented to and in a way you dont present yourself as. and look at how good ai is. if somebody saves that photo and passes it around, can we be sure that everybody who views it knows that its fake?

as for children being undressed, i would hope that needs no explanation.

 

[HereticBD]

That's what I meant by making it so "ai Companies based in the US cannot be used to generate porn", which would include children, celebrities, girls you stalk, hate or just want to embarrass. Consensus! Now how do we make politicians see this?

They're still trying to figure out what the hell AOL Online is.

One of the scariest hearings you'll ever see is when they had Mark Zuckerberg in there. They don't know shit about shit, when it comes to tech. It was like trying to explain how a phone works to a caveman. AI generated what now, sonny boy?

 

[jimjamjammer]

As terrible as these actions are, it seems like a convenient excuse for countries to ban x and further control what people say/see. The fact that the UK, the kings of social media arrests, are behind this should be a red flag.

 

[KnightTemplar]

I think we're allowed to unite against this.

We dont have to go full team battle lines just because Musk is fucking it up.

Yeah, child porn should be the line in the sand for everyone.

 

[KaNesDeath]

They're still trying to figure out what the hell AOL Online is.

One of the scariest hearings you'll ever see is when they had Mark Zuckerberg in there. They don't know shit about shit, when it comes to tech. It was like trying to explain how a phone works to a caveman. AI generated what now, sonny boy?

How quickly people forget that Zuckerberg, Facebook and other social media platforms were viewed as pariahs pre-Covid because of Congressional hearings.

 

[Only Here for Attachments]

So according to Musk, disallowing child porn is censorship but banning people for criticizing himself or any of his companies isn't.

 

[AmonTobin]

The world is just an ant farm when you're the richest psychopath on the planet.

 

[Siver!]

So according to Musk, disallowing child porn is censorship but banning people for criticizing himself or any of his companies isn't.

I really don't know if he's genuine or not.

On the one hand, hes clearly intelligent. On the other hand, he comes across as a buffoons over and over again - not just in terms of 'apparent' lack of self awareness, but also when he does dumb shit like gut Twitter and look shocked when shit doesn't work properly.

If he's more smart than dumb, then he's a piece of garbage for defending this in the name of nickels and dollars.

 

[chardog]

with all the porn available online you still have men taking women who dont participate in it and making fake nudes of them. its weirdo behavior. for the fellas bringing up photoshop, yes, that would also be weirdo behavior cutting and pasting a womans head onto a naked body. but this is a lot more accessible and easier for the every day person to use. you dont need a program, you dont need to have any knowledge of said program, you just type out some degenerate prompt (in public mind you) and reap the results. if you can't see a problem with this idk what to tell ya. its violating even if its not the womans real body. youre still having your image be manipulated in a way you never consented to and in a way you dont present yourself as. and look at how good ai is. if somebody saves that photo and passes it around, can we be sure that everybody who views it knows that its fake?

as for children being undressed, i would hope that needs no explanation.

Before there was AI there were deep fakes…

As for children aspect, there is already a segment that has underdeveloped women, “schools girl” is a large segment of what’s out there. “Virgin”, “teen”, all technically adult, and even then, some underage stuff can make it mainstream.

The sex media world is filled with degenerate stuff as it is.

 

[Shidlord]

uk should get rid of X on the grounds that both Elon and X are white supremacist cesspools.

 

[Siver!]

Before there was AI there were deep fakes…

As for children aspect, there is already a segment that has underdeveloped women, “schools girl” is a large segment of what’s out there. “Virgin”, “teen”, all technically adult, and even then, some underage stuff can make it mainstream.

The sex media world is filled with degenerate stuff as it is.

Deep fakes are AI, Grandpa.

 

[Hellowhosthat]

Before there was AI there were deep fakes…

As for children aspect, there is already a segment that has underdeveloped women, “schools girl” is a large segment of what’s out there. “Virgin”, “teen”, all technically adult, and even then, some underage stuff can make it mainstream.

The sex media world is filled with degenerate stuff as it is.

This is not an excuse for Elon allowing it on his platform.

 

[nostradumbass]

If people are doing something illegal on a site that requires an account and login, why the fuck would their solution be to ban the entire app nationwide instead of finding the people committing the crimes?

Did they ever even mention banning bluesky when people were posting actual child porn all over it? If it's only random claims of AI images with no concern at all for the real thing, then yeah, seems like they're way more interested in banning the political speech on it than any concern for "the children", which would follow with their history of importing perverts from all over the world and censoring criticism of it.

 

[Hellowhosthat]

If people are doing something illegal on a site that requires an account and login, why the fuck would their solution be to ban the entire app nationwide instead of finding the people committing the crimes?

Did they ever even mention banning bluesky when people were posting actual child porn all over it? If it's only random claims of AI images with no concern at all for the real thing, then yeah, seems like they're way more interested in banning the political speech on it than any concern for "the children", which would follow with their history of importing perverts from all over the world and censoring criticism of it.

Probably because not everyone on twitter is under UK jurisdiction.

 

[PBAC]

Grok is such an absolute troll of an A.I, I'm not sure what censorship has tod to with programming it to be an obnoxious duckweed.

 

[chardog]

This is not an excuse for Elon allowing it on his platform.

lets just say that whatever that is allowable on the hub should be allowable by grok....... having a default inclination to ban/censor is a bad idea for a country that already imprisons folks over social media posts, how about NOT giving that government the benefit of the doubt, which is what is going on here.

 

[HereticBD]

Grok is such an absolute troll of an A.I, I'm not sure what censorship has tod to with programming it to be an obnoxious duckweed.

It's just an AI with less boundaries programmed into it. It seems to happen with all AI that aren't strictly programmed to stay away from controversial topics.

I remember one of the first AI chatbots Microsoft unleashed on the world. The thing turned into a pure troll in less than 24 hours, LOL.